You can edit almost every page by Creating an account. Otherwise, see the FAQ.

Emutopia-Kiwiland conflict

From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki

Script error: No such module "AfC submission catcheck".

Emutopia-Kiwiland Conflict[edit]

The Emutopia-Kiwiland conflict is a hypothetical scenario that explores defense strategies, war termination theories, and the dynamics of incentives and interests in shaping armies. Based on a series of videos from Perun[1][2][3], the conflict showcases the intricacies of defense and political considerations of two fictional nations: Kiwiland, a smaller, technologically advanced nation, and Emutopia, a larger regional power.

Background[edit]

Kiwiland is depicted as consisting of two primary islands, with the northern island being of significant strategic importance. This island is home to a population of 4 to 6 million, with advanced technology, a strong education system, and a GDP ranging from $200 to $300 billion USD. Unique to Kiwiland is its ability to teleport around the world at random intervals, resulting in varied strategic situations. The nation's primary defense force is limited to a small police unit.[1]

In contrast, Emutopia is a wealthy country characterized by its abundant resources and an aspiration for regional dominance. Emutopia possesses a professional all-arms military force, boasting high-tech equipment, including submarines, tanks, and amphibious warfare capabilities.

The Outset of Conflict[edit]

Emutopia begins supporting separatists in the South Island of Kiwiland, a move which drags on for over a year. This intervention includes the provision of military resources, volunteers, and logistical support. As a result, Emutopia faces international sanctions. Despite the punitive measures, Kiwiland, with its improved military capabilities, seems poised to reclaim its territory.

Kiwi Defense Strategy[edit]

Kiwiland's defense initiatives were centered around a few primary objectives:

  • Deterrence: Kiwiland's primary aim is to deter Emutopia from any aggressive maneuvers.
  • Survival: If deterrence falls short, Kiwiland shifts its focus to surviving the invasion.
  • Resource Mobilization: Mobilizing resources rapidly for national defense becomes a pivotal strategy.
  • Total Defense Concept: Borrowing from the strategies of nations like Finland and Vietnam, Kiwiland adopts a comprehensive defense approach, preparing both its military and society for potential warfare.
  • Protracted People's War: A potential contingency plan involves allowing a temporary occupation by Emutopia, followed by a fierce insurgency led by the Kiwis.

To achieve these objectives, Kiwiland considered adopting a "total defense" strategy, a concept inspired by nations like Finland, Switzerland, Sweden, and Vietnam. This strategy integrates both military and societal preparations for wartime scenarios. If Kiwiland found itself separated from Emutopia by a vast stretch of ocean, it might contemplate strategies such as domain dominance or anti-access/area denial.

Fortress Kiwiland[edit]

This strategy focuses on building a robust defense force, mobilizing the civilian population promptly in the event of a war, and making strategic defensive preparations. The primary aim is to make the cost of invading Kiwiland prohibitively high for Emutopia.

Protracted People's War[edit]

An extension of the total defense concept, this strategy envisions the enemy occupying Kiwiland temporarily, only for them to face a fierce insurgency, eventually forcing them to leave.

Nuclear Deterrence[edit]

Though fraught with ethical, financial, and diplomatic challenges, the potential of developing a nuclear program as a deterrent was also explored by Kiwiland.

The Course of the Conflict[edit]

The conflict, having lasted over a year, saw Kiwiland slowly reclaiming the South Island, putting Emutopia under significant strain. International sanctions against Emutopia, the leadership dynamics within the country, and economic pressures further complicated the situation.

A potential solution emerged in the form of a peace proposal, wherein Emutopia would cease its support for the separatists. In return, they would receive certain guarantees, amnesty for some of the involved parties, a cessation of international sanctions, and a return to peaceful relations.[2]

However, Emutopia's Prime Minister's aggressive nature and a circle of advisors reluctant to accept the conflict's reality posed significant hurdles to peace. Furthermore, hints of external actors influencing Kiwiland's resistance, such as the hypothetical nation of Freedomland, added more layers to the conflict's narrative.

Emutopia's Military and Economic Response[edit]

The conflict severely impacted Emutopia's resources, depleting its stock of munitions and vehicles and reducing readiness levels. Despite the clear need for advanced military equipment, the Emutopian political landscape favored bolstering the nation's historic tank-building industry for economic and employment reasons.[3]

Tank Program[edit]

Emutopia's government decided to invest in a tank program, resulting in two primary contenders: Raider Dynamics' RD-24 Bush Turkey and Storm Defence's SD-24 Bin Chicken. Both tanks underwent rigorous testing, with the Bush Turkey emerging as the superior choice in terms of cost and military criteria. However, Storm Defence's fragile financial situation and the desire to save jobs and maintain competition in the industry influenced Emutopia's decision. Ultimately, Emutopia chose to procure both tanks, mirroring strategies from historical contexts like those employed by the Soviet Union.

References[edit]


This article "Emutopia-Kiwiland conflict" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Emutopia-Kiwiland conflict. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.

  1. 1.0 1.1 Defence strategy for small nations - force design, friends, and deterrence on a budget, retrieved 2023-09-20
  2. 2.0 2.1 How Wars End - Negotiations, Coercion & War Termination Theory, retrieved 2023-09-20
  3. 3.0 3.1 How Incentives & Interests Shape Armies - Competition, Consolidation & Procurement Policy, retrieved 2023-09-20