You can edit almost every page by Creating an account. Otherwise, see the FAQ.

Gap in law

From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki




Gap in law - other names: legal gap, lacuna (plurar: lacunae or lacunas) and loophole.

Gaps in law are of a different sort. There are distinguished:

  • extra legem gap (gap outside the law), called also an uprovided case or casus omissus – arises when a specific case or legal issue is not explicitly dealt with in written law; this the more common (default) kind of a gap in law.
  • intra legem gap (gap within the law), called also an interpretational gap or indeterminacy gap – occurs when there is a statutory provision which regulates the case at hand, but this provision is vague or equivocal
  • contra legem gap (gap against or contrary to the law) – comes into being when there is a statutory provision which applies to the case at hand but this provision leads in this case to an unwanted outcome
  • technical gap, called also an intrinsic gag, constructional gap, gap of passivity, vertical gap or sui generis gap – consists in the lack of a larger part of statutory law which according to law should be enacted (issued), especially such that disenable passing of a judicial or administrative decision or working of the institution which are envisaged by the law.
  • gap of conflict or collision, called also a praxeological (teleological) gap, logical gap or gap by contradiction – takes place when two or more statutory provisions contradict each other

In common law (case law) a counterpart of a legal gap is the so-called case of first impression.

Gaps are filled by recourse to analogy (legis and iuris), reasoning from a legal principle(s), an argument a fortiori, an argument a contrario, other kinds of inferences from norms or some other less constrained judicial considerations.[1]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. See Maciej Koszowski, The Scope of Application of Analogical Reasoning in Statutory Law. American International Journal of Contemporary Research no. 1/2017 (v. 7), pp. 17-22, 24-27.

Bibliography[edit]

Maciej Koszowski, The Scope of Application of Analogical Reasoning in Statutory Law. American International Journal of Contemporary Research no. 1/2017 (v. 7): 16-34.

References[edit]


This article "Gap in law" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Gap in law. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.