You can edit almost every page by Creating an account. Otherwise, see the FAQ.

Homeopathic Software Engineering

From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki

Attempting to save a massive complex software product in the marketplace from a competing equivalent product by adding an insubstantial feature; making an insignificant change touting dramatic improvements based on little or no evidence any such changes will help; often attempted out of fear or in light of another, usually better, option that Executive Leadership will avoid with extreme prejudice because they might be wrong.[1]

Homeopathic practice has been criticized as unethical because it discourages the use of effective treatments,[2] with the World Health Organization warning against using homeopathy to try to treat severe diseases such as HIV and malaria.[3] The continued practice of homeopathy, despite a lack of evidence of efficacy,[4][5][6] has led to it being characterized within the scientific and medical communities as nonsense,[7] quackery,[8][9] and a sham.[10]

References[edit]

  1. "Support the People of Wikipedia | Ministry for the Poor and Vulnerable". damon.sicore.com. Retrieved 2018-03-19.
  2. Shaw, David M. (2010-03-01). "Homeopathy is where the harm is: five unethical effects of funding unscientific 'remedies'". Journal of Medical Ethics. 36 (3): 130–131. doi:10.1136/jme.2009.034959. ISSN 0306-6800. PMID 20211989.
  3. Mashta, O (August 24, 2009). "WHO warns against using homoeopathy to treat serious diseases". BMJ. 339 (aug24 2): b3447–b3447. doi:10.1136/bmj.b3447.
  4. Ernst, E (December 2002). "A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy". British journal of clinical pharmacology. 54 (6): 577–82. PMID 12492603.
  5. Shang, Aijing; Huwiler-Müntener, Karin; Nartey, Linda; Jüni, Peter; Dörig, Stephan; Sterne, Jonathan AC; Pewsner, Daniel; Egger, Matthias (2005). "Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy". The Lancet. 366 (9487): 726–32. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2. PMID 16125589.
  6. Kleijnen, J; Knipschild, P; ter Riet, G (9 February 1991). "Clinical trials of homoeopathy". BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 302 (6772): 316–23. PMID 1825800.
  7. "Homeopathy is nonsense, says new chief scientist". The Daily Telegraph. April 18, 2013. Retrieved September 9, 2013.
  8. Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP (2014). Chapter 2: Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How Do They Differ?. Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century. Springer. pp. 19–57. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2. ISBN 978-1-4614-8540-7. within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery Search this book on
  9. Paul S. Boyer. The Oxford companion to United States history. ISBN 9780195082098. Retrieved January 15, 2013. After 1847, when regular doctors organized the American Medical Association (AMA), that body led the war on "quackery", especially targeting dissenting medical groups such as homeopaths, who prescribed infinitesimally small doses of medicine. Ironically, even as the AMA attacked all homeopathy as quackery, educated homeopathic physicians were expelling untrained quacks from their ranks. Search this book on
  10. "Supported by science?: What Canadian naturopaths advertise to the public". Retrieved January 15, 2013. Within the non-CAM scientific community, homeopathy has long been viewed as a sham


This article "Homeopathic Software Engineering" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Homeopathic Software Engineering. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.