You can edit almost every page by Creating an account. Otherwise, see the FAQ.

Outcome Questionnaire-45.2

From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki

The Outcome Questionnaire®-45.2 (OQ®-45.2) is a measure created by Dr. Michael Lambert which evaluates symptom distress, interpersonal relationships, and social role. The OQ®-45.2 was designed for repeated measurement of client psychological functioning while attending therapy and post-therapy.[1]

The OQ®-45.2 measures the three subscales:

Symptom Distress: This subscale pertains to primarily depression and anxiety.

Interpersonal Relationships: Measures loneliness, conflict with others, and marriage and family difficulties.

Social Role: This construct measures difficulties in the workplace, school, or home duties.

The OQ®-45.2 has several features included within the measure. The measure assesses risk, including suicide potential, substance abuse, and potential violence at work. It is a standardized instrument with empirical data and was normed on a local and national populations[2]. Some found the OQ®-45.2 to discriminate between clinical and nonclinical samples[3][4]. Jacobson and Truax[5] developed formulas for clinical and normative data for the OQ®-45.2 and Lambert et al.[6] analyzed them to provide cutoff scores for the reliable change index (RCI; 14 points) and clinically significant change (dysfunctional/functional cutoff: 64/63). These cutoff scores and classifications for change that were formulas are supported by multiple studies[7][8]. They also provide consensus with other self report measures like the Beck Depression Inventory[9] and the Symptom Checklist-90[10]. These statistics from this comes secondary from a study by Beecher et al[11]. The OQ®-45.2 is available in English, Canadian French, Norwegian, Spanish and Swedish with the OQ®-Analyst software.

The OQ®-45.2 is designed to be administer in 3-5 minutes with a total of 45 questions that are self-reported. Items are measured on a 5 point Likert scale: 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, 4=almost always. The range of scores on the OQ®-45.2 that is possible is 0-180, with higher scores meaning greater distress. Counseling Centers, companies, and therapists giving the measure to clients are encouraged to give clients the OQ®-45.2 every session to optimize its efficacy[12]. As the client fills out the measure frequently, therapists are able to see and use the patterns and trends exhibited by the client's responses and address them in session.

In addition to the OQ®-45.2, the OQ Measures company also offers the OQ®-45.2 TA. The OQ®-45.2 TA is a new measure including the OQ®-45.2 and an additional 11 questions from the OQ®-ASC about the Therapeutic Alliance[13]. The purpose of this measure is to assess the client's perception of the relationship between the client and therapist.

References[edit]

  1. Bauer, S., Lambert, M.J., Nielson, S.L., 2004. Clinical significance methods: acomparison of statistical techniques. J. Pers. Assess. 82, 60–70. https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8201_11.
  2. "The OQ®-45.2 is our most comprehensive adult Outcome Questionnaire".
  3. Lambert, M.J., Morton, J.J., Hatfield, D.R., Harmon, C., Hamilton, E.G., Reid,R.C., et al., 2004. Administration and Scoring Manual for the OQ-45.2 (Outcome Questionnaire). American Professional Credentialing Services, Salt Lake City, UT.
  4. Umphress, V.J., Lambert, M.J., Smart, D.W., Barlow, S.H., Clouse, G., 1997. Concurrent and construct validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 15, 40–55.
  5. Jacobson, N.S., Truax, P., 1991. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 59, 12–19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12.
  6. Lambert, M.J., Morton, J.J., Hatfield, D.R., Harmon, C., Hamilton, E.G., Reid,R.C., et al., 2004. Administration and Scoring Manual for the OQ-45.2 (Outcome Questionnaire). American Professional Credentialing Services, SaltLakeCity, UT.
  7. Lunnen, K.M., Ogles, B.M., 1998. A multiperspective, multivariable evaluation of reliable change. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 66, 400–410. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.400.
  8. Bauer, S., Lambert, M.J., Nielson, S.L., 2004. Clinical significance methods: acomparison of statistical techniques. J. Pers. Assess. 82, 60–70. https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8201_11.
  9. Beck, A.T., Steer, R.A., Ball, R., Ranieri, W., 1996. Comparison of Beck depression inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J. Pers. Assess. . https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13
  10. Derogatis, L.R., 1996. SCL-90-R: Symptom Checklist-90-R: Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual. NCS Pearson, Minneapolis, MN.
  11. Beecher, M. E., Eggett, D., Erekson, D., Rees, L. B., Bingham, J., Klundt, J., & ... Boardman, R. (2016). Sunshine on my shoulders: Weather, pollution, and emotional distress. Journal Of Affective Disorders, 205234-238. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.07.021
  12. "The OQ®-45.2 is our most comprehensive adult Outcome Questionnaire".
  13. "The OQ®-45.2 is our most comprehensive adult Outcome Questionnaire".


This article "Outcome Questionnaire-45.2" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Outcome Questionnaire-45.2. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.