Babcock v. Kijakazi
From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki
Script error: No such module "AfC submission catcheck".
Babcock v. Kijakazi | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued October 13, 2021 Decided January 13, 2022 | |
Full case name | Babcock v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
Docket no. | 20-480 |
Holding | |
Civil-service pension payments based on employment as a dualstatus military technician are not payments based on “service as a member of a uniformed service” under 42 U. S. C. §415(a)(7)(A)(III). | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Barrett, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh |
Dissent | Gorsuch |
Laws applied | |
42 U. S. C. §415(a)(7)(A)(III) |
![]() | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help EverybodyWiki by expanding it. |
This article "Babcock v. Kijakazi" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Babcock v. Kijakazi. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.