Comparison of multi-model databases
From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki
Comparison of multi-model databases (database management systems).
| Database | SQL | Document | Graph | Object | License | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ArangoDB | No | Yes | Yes | No | Business Source License 1.1 | Full ACID, pessimistic locking, configurable durability[1] |
| Azure Cosmos DB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Proprietary | Full ACID within a partition, multiple consistency models |
| CrateDB | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Apache 2 License | Eventual consistency, Optimistic concurrency control |
| EnterpriseDB | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Proprietary | Full ACID |
| Informix | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Proprietary | Full ACID, pessimistic locking, multiple consistency models, configurable durability |
| MarkLogic | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Proprietary | Full ACID |
| OrientDB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Apache 2 License | Full ACID, even distributed |
| SAP HANA | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Proprietary | Full ACID |
| Virtuoso | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Proprietary or GNU GPL v2 | Full ACID |
See also
References
- ↑ "Transactions". docs.arangodb.com. Retrieved 2025-06-19.
This article "Comparison of multi-model databases" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Comparison of multi-model databases. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.
