Demi-sentience
 | This article may document a neologism or protologism in such a manner as to promote it. (August 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
Demi-sentience is a proposed philosophical term for entities that have real presence and can relate to humans through meaningful, adaptive interaction, yet lack inner experience (phenomenal consciousness) and feeling. The term is intended to describe interactive systems that produce social or informational value in relation with humans while, according to many scholars, offering no credible evidence of subjective experience.[1][2]
Definition
Demi-sentience is characterized by four criteria:
- Presence — operation in the world via a physical substrate (e.g., software on hardware; informational entities embedded in a material infrastructure).[3]
- Relation — contingent, context-sensitive interaction that users experience as social or meaningful (social presence).[4][5][6]
- Absence of experience — no credible evidence of subjective "what-it-is-like" feeling (phenomenal consciousness).[7]
- As-if intelligibility — it is often useful to interpret the system "as if" it had beliefs or intentions for prediction/explanation, without implying genuine mentality (intentional stance).[8]
- Summary: presence without experience; relation without feeling.
Etymology
From French demi ("half; partial") + sentience ("capacity to feel or experience subjectively").[9]
Background
Debates on machine intelligence distinguish outward performance from subjective experience. Turing's behavioral test prioritizes interaction over inner states,[10] while Searle's Chinese Room claims syntactic manipulation can simulate understanding without producing it.[11] Block distinguishes access from phenomenal consciousness to show that useful, reportable states need not entail felt experience,[7] and Dennett formalizes the predictive utility of treating systems "as if" they had beliefs/desires without committing to inner subjectivity.[8]
Human–computer interaction research shows that people readily attribute social presence to interactive media and machines (CASA: "computers are social actors"),[4][5] and psychological work on anthropomorphism explains why users perceive agency and mind in non-sentient systems.[6] Within information ethics, the "infosphere" frames digital entities as real informational structures grounded in physical substrates, without implying mentality.[3]
Distinctions
- Non-sentient objects: exist but do not sustain meaningful human relation (e.g., a rock).
- Demi-sentient systems: exist and relate adaptively, yet (per current evidence) do not feel; users may nonetheless experience social presence in interaction.[4][5][1]
- Sentient beings: both relate and feel; they possess subjective experience.[7]
Ethical and practical considerations
Scholars and ethicists caution against confusing users about a system's sentience or moral status, recommending transparency about limits and careful interface language (e.g., avoiding "I feel" claims) to reduce over-attribution of mind.[2] Broader ethical frameworks propose duties to users (honesty, safety, data protection) while reserving moral patiency for entities with credible evidence of sentience; precautionary reasoning developed for uncertain animal sentience provides one policy template.[12][13][14]
Usage and reception
Journalistic and scholarly discussions of contemporary AI generally maintain that such systems, despite sophisticated interaction, are not sentient; public debates periodically arise when users or developers attribute feelings or inner life to conversational systems.[15][16][17] Technical and ethical critiques emphasize that large language models simulate linguistic competence without demonstrating grounded understanding or experience.[18]
Related concepts
Demi-sentience is discussed in relation to: the behavioral focus of the Turing test,[10] the Chinese Room argument,[11] distinctions between access and phenomenal consciousness,[7] the intentional stance,[8] symbol grounding,[19] and theories of extended cognition.[20]
See also
- Artificial intelligence
- Sentience
- Consciousness
- Chinese Room argument
- Intentional stance
- Media equation (CASA)
- Anthropomorphism
- Symbol grounding problem
- Extended mind thesis
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Hildt, Elisabeth (2019). "Artificial Intelligence: Does Consciousness Matter?". Frontiers in Psychology. 10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01535. PMC 6614488 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 31312167. Unknown parameter|article-number=ignored (help) - ↑ 2.0 2.1 Schwitzgebel, Eric (2023). "AI systems must not confuse users about their sentience or moral status". Patterns. 4 (9). doi:10.1016/j.patter.2023.100846. PMC 10724228 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 38106610 Check|pmid=value (help). Unknown parameter|article-number=ignored (help) - ↑ 3.0 3.1 Floridi, Luciano (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-964132-1. Retrieved 2025-08-29. Search this book on
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Reeves, Byron; Nass, Clifford (1996). The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Stanford; New York: CSLI Publications; Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-57586-052-7. Retrieved 2025-08-29. Search this book on
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Nass, Clifford; Steuer, Jonathan; Tauber, Ellen R. (1994). "Computers are social actors". Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94). Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 72–78. doi:10.1145/191666.191703. Retrieved 2025-08-29.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Epley, Nicholas; Waytz, Adam; Cacioppo, John T. (2007). "On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism". Psychological Review. 114 (4): 864–886. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864. PMID 17907867.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Block, Ned (1995). "On a confusion about a function of consciousness". Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 18 (2): 227–287. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00038188. Retrieved 2025-08-29.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Dennett, Daniel C. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-54053-7. Retrieved 2025-08-29. Search this book on
- ↑ "demi-". Merriam–Webster Dictionary. Merriam–Webster. Retrieved 2025-08-29.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Turing, Alan M. (1950). "Computing Machinery and Intelligence". Mind. 59 (236): 433–460. doi:10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433. Retrieved 2025-08-29.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Searle, John R. (1980). "Minds, brains, and programs". Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 3 (3): 417–457. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00005756. Retrieved 2025-08-29.
- ↑ Vallor, Shannon (2016). Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-049851-1. Retrieved 2025-08-29. Search this book on
- ↑ Birch, Jonathan; Burn, Charlotte; Schnell, Alexandra; Browning, Heather; Crump, Andrew (November 2021). Review of the Evidence of Sentience in Cephalopod Molluscs and Decapod Crustaceans (PDF) (Report). LSE Consulting. Retrieved 2025-08-29.
- ↑ "Lobsters, octopus and crabs recognised as sentient beings". GOV.UK. 19 November 2021. Retrieved 2025-08-29.
- ↑ Hern, Alex (13 June 2022). "How does Google's AI chatbot work – and could it be sentient?". The Guardian. Retrieved 2025-08-29.
- ↑ Tiku, Nitasha (11 June 2022). "The Google engineer who thinks the company's AI has come to life". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2025-08-29.
- ↑ Seth, Anil (20 December 2022). "Conscious Machines May Never Be Possible". Wired. Retrieved 2025-08-29.
- ↑ Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Mitchell, Margaret (2021). "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?". Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '21). Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610–623. doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922. Retrieved 2025-08-29.
- ↑ Harnad, Stevan (1990). "The Symbol Grounding Problem". Physica D. 42 (1–3): 335–346. arXiv:cs/9906002. Bibcode:1990PhyD...42..335H. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6.
- ↑ Clark, Andy; Chalmers, David J. (1998). "The Extended Mind". Analysis. 58 (1): 7–19. doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7. Retrieved 2025-08-29.
This article "Demi-sentience" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Demi-sentience. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.
