You can edit almost every page by Creating an account and confirming your email.

Edithistory:RAM card

From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki
oldid date/time username edit summary
1188818762 2023-12-07T22:02:25Z DrJuiceBoy added [[Category:Computer hardware]]; removed {{uncategorized}} using [[WP:HC|HotCat]]
1188587205 2023-12-06T10:26:49Z Onel5969 clean up, added [[CAT:O|orphan]] tag
1188552275 2023-12-06T03:41:25Z Significa liberdade Nominated page for deletion using [[Wikipedia:Page Curation|Page Curation]] ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RAM card]])
1188533411 2023-12-06T01:05:28Z ReadOnlyAccount Undid revision 1188509201 by [[Special:Contributions/Keresluna|Keresluna]] ([[User talk:Keresluna|talk]]) rv. See Talk
1188529274 2023-12-06T00:34:14Z ReadOnlyAccount solutions ... solutions it terrible style. Egg on mey culpa.
1188513053 2023-12-05T22:26:45Z Положение
1188509201 2023-12-05T21:58:51Z Keresluna Proposing article for deletion per [[WP:PROD]].
1188508278 2023-12-05T21:52:35Z Keresluna
1188498825 2023-12-05T20:42:38Z ReadOnlyAccount Oh, don't now tell me there's not an article for multifunction cards either. Somebody should write one. Hey YOU! Get on that!
1188498162 2023-12-05T20:38:01Z Significa liberdade Added {{[[Template:Unreferenced|Unreferenced]]}} and {{[[Template:Uncategorized|Uncategorized]]}} tags
1188497934 2023-12-05T20:36:03Z ReadOnlyAccount Undid revision 1188496033 by [[Special:Contributions/Keresluna|Keresluna]] ([[User talk:Keresluna|talk]]) rv. With respect, despite the similarity of the terminology, you don't understand what RAM cards were, and I struggle to believe you've read this and the ext link. Despite some relation & conceptual overlap, we're talking apples & oranges. While it's possible some may have called RAM cards memory cards & vice versa: {{cn}} for that. Also, your target doesn't cover this article content at all
1188496033 2023-12-05T20:22:27Z Keresluna [[WP:AES|←]]Redirected page to [[Memory card]]
1188494612 2023-12-05T20:12:56Z ReadOnlyAccount I can't believe this article didn't already exist. Very bad recency bias, maybe?