Edithistory:STAR voting
From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki
| oldid | date/time | username | edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 856401494 | 2018-08-24T22:46:24Z | Nardopolo | Another notable source article about STAR Voting and the effort in Lane County, Oregon. |
| 856401152 | 2018-08-24T22:42:12Z | Nardopolo | Notable source reference for campaign in Oregon |
| 855950425 | 2018-08-21T22:39:12Z | Homunq | /* Properties */ punct |
| 855950344 | 2018-08-21T22:38:28Z | Homunq | /* Properties */ qualify Condorcet loser and majority loser criteria, based on Schulze's points at AfD. |
| 855874913 | 2018-08-21T12:01:41Z | MarkusSchulze | AfD: Nominated for deletion; see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STAR voting]]. |
| 855751992 | 2018-08-20T15:54:58Z | Homunq | /* Properties */ reversal (only violates for 3 candidates) |
| 855727652 | 2018-08-20T12:21:33Z | Homunq | /* Properties */ See talk. I know, this is to some degree OR, but status quo on voting articles is to allow this kind of OR for well-known/undisputed facts; impossible to find cites for every criteria (non)compliance. |
| 855726685 | 2018-08-20T12:10:14Z | Homunq | /* Properties */ |
| 855726486 | 2018-08-20T12:08:10Z | Homunq | /* Properties */ reorganize for clarity |
| 855726234 | 2018-08-20T12:05:30Z | Homunq | /* Properties */ awk |
| 855726007 | 2018-08-20T12:03:16Z | Homunq | /* Properties */ Move monotonicity quibbles to footnote |
| 855723069 | 2018-08-20T11:32:52Z | Homunq | /* Properties */ Monotonicity=mono-raise |
| 855713676 | 2018-08-20T09:42:32Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855713504 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855713504 | 2018-08-20T09:40:20Z | Nardopolo | /* Properties */ |
| 855712679 | 2018-08-20T09:30:32Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855712656 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855712656 | 2018-08-20T09:30:16Z | Nardopolo | ... |
| 855712435 | 2018-08-20T09:27:48Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855712403 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855712403 | 2018-08-20T09:27:23Z | Nardopolo | [[User talk:MarkusSchulze|talk]] continues to edit page with erroneous examples. See Talk page. |
| 855712265 | 2018-08-20T09:25:52Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855712242 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855712242 | 2018-08-20T09:25:33Z | Nardopolo | Schulze uses invalid source to support an example that does not show a monotonicity criterion failure. |
| 855712062 | 2018-08-20T09:23:16Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855711969 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855712030 | 2018-08-20T09:22:53Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855712011 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855712011 | 2018-08-20T09:22:35Z | Nardopolo | Example is not an example of monotonicity criterion failure. |
| 855711978 | 2018-08-20T09:22:01Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855711944 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855711969 | 2018-08-20T09:21:51Z | Nardopolo | No reason given for undo, so undoing it. |
| 855711944 | 2018-08-20T09:21:31Z | Nardopolo | No reason given for undo, so undoing it. |
| 855711910 | 2018-08-20T09:21:01Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855711691 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855711887 | 2018-08-20T09:20:46Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855711669 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855711691 | 2018-08-20T09:17:47Z | Nardopolo | Timing! |
| 855711669 | 2018-08-20T09:17:29Z | Nardopolo | Whoops! Looks like that bogus example crept back in! See talk page. |
| 855711645 | 2018-08-20T09:17:08Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855711609 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855711625 | 2018-08-20T09:16:49Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855711542 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855711609 | 2018-08-20T09:16:39Z | Nardopolo | Cleaned up after incorrect monotonicity example. |
| 855711542 | 2018-08-20T09:15:43Z | Nardopolo | Editor gives an example that involves changing the support for two candidates, where the monotonicity criterion refers only to a single candidate. Refer to the talk page. |
| 855711503 | 2018-08-20T09:15:13Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855711413 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855711413 | 2018-08-20T09:13:41Z | Nardopolo | Obviously this should go to some sort of Wikipedia arbitration system. [[User:MarkusSchulze|Markus Schulze]] continues to revert to a draft that relies on an invalid source, has failed to answer concerns on the talk page, and both of us have reverted more than three times. Given that I'm confident the facts are on my side, I'll be looking at how to manage the next step. Good night! |
| 855711153 | 2018-08-20T09:10:23Z | MarkusSchulze | |
| 855709815 | 2018-08-20T08:51:44Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855709618 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855709618 | 2018-08-20T08:48:41Z | Nardopolo | Editor's change has nothing to do with his supposed reason for making it. STAR is on the ballot currently for adoption in real political elections as several notable sources in the article attest. If Schulze thinks the article as a whole does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, he should mark it for deletion, not make an edit regarding the Monotonicity Criterion using an unreliable source. |
| 855709216 | 2018-08-20T08:42:12Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855708310 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]); the STAR voting article itself is [[WP:OR|original research]] as no article on this voting method has ever been published in a peer-reviewed journal. |
| 855708310 | 2018-08-20T08:27:52Z | Nardopolo | Editor used source that is, by its own text, not Wikipedia:PUBLISHED -- see quoted source https://rangevoting.org/StarVoting.html which clearly articulates that the analysis is "PRELIMINARY" and "biased against" the topic matter. |
| 855707243 | 2018-08-20T08:14:17Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855706833 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855706833 | 2018-08-20T08:12:13Z | Nardopolo | /* Properties */ |
| 855704843 | 2018-08-20T07:45:24Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855701753 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]) |
| 855701753 | 2018-08-20T06:58:31Z | Nardopolo | /* Properties */ |
| 855209093 | 2018-08-16T17:42:34Z | MarkusSchulze | |
| 855205330 | 2018-08-16T17:08:57Z | 2601:184:4A80:2D60:6CBC:A9B5:1635:DD7D | /* Properties */ Condorcet loser |
| 855205201 | 2018-08-16T17:07:52Z | 2601:184:4A80:2D60:6CBC:A9B5:1635:DD7D | /* Properties */ mutual majority — satisfies weaker version. |
| 855067162 | 2018-08-15T18:17:05Z | MarkusSchulze | Undid revision 855006492 by [[Special:Contributions/Nardopolo|Nardopolo]] ([[User talk:Nardopolo|talk]]); see [[Talk:STAR voting#Monotonicity]] |
| 855006492 | 2018-08-15T08:25:21Z | Nardopolo | /* Properties */ Removed incorrect statements regarding monotonicity. The monotonicity criterion is well-established, and the linked article from Smith's Score Voting site contradicts its own definition of the monotonicity criterion, as well as those promulgated by Wikipedia and the Center for Election Science. The conclusion drawn regarding strategic voting that rests on this assertion is likewise false. |
| 853748638 | 2018-08-06T19:34:23Z | MarkusSchulze | modified link to original proposal |
| 853652165 | 2018-08-06T04:16:43Z | Omegatron | /* Motivation */ Moving to talk page |
| 853651235 | 2018-08-06T04:08:21Z | Omegatron | combine duplicate refs |
| 853650334 | 2018-08-06T04:00:39Z | Omegatron | /* Motivation */ long quotes from advocacy site, claiming that this one concept is their "motivation", he "even claims", "complete misinterpretation", "it is easy to see", etc. This sounds like it belongs more on a personal blog/forum than on Wikipedia. |
| 853283274 | 2018-08-03T17:07:17Z | MarkusSchulze | motivation |
| 853281623 | 2018-08-03T16:53:36Z | MarkusSchulze | motivation |
| 853261136 | 2018-08-03T13:59:56Z | MarkusSchulze | added motivation |
| 853213849 | 2018-08-03T05:29:43Z | MarkusSchulze | citation is provided |
| 853184448 | 2018-08-03T00:31:28Z | AnomieBOT | Dating maintenance tags: {{Original research section}} |
| 853182637 | 2018-08-03T00:11:25Z | Omegatron | |
| 853073014 | 2018-08-02T07:42:21Z | MarkusSchulze | clarified [[monotonicity criterion|monotonicity]] |
| 852191875 | 2018-07-27T07:38:30Z | MarkusSchulze | added [[later-no-help criterion]] |
| 852046066 | 2018-07-26T08:22:15Z | MarkusSchulze | /* Properties */ |
| 851570695 | 2018-07-23T05:50:13Z | Barkeep49 | Added tags to the page using [[Wikipedia:Page Curation|Page Curation]] (original research) |
| 851448949 | 2018-07-22T10:46:17Z | MarkusSchulze | Example is given. See [[Talk:STAR voting#Participation and Consistency]] |
| 851357109 | 2018-07-21T18:48:44Z | Omegatron | /* Properties */ add refs |
| 851354258 | 2018-07-21T18:24:10Z | Omegatron | /* Properties */ rewording and add explanation of majority |
| 850914917 | 2018-07-18T20:22:00Z | MarkusSchulze | added [[independence of clones criterion|independence of clones]], [[majority loser criterion|majority loser]], [[participation criterion|participation]], and [[consistency criterion|consistency]] |
| 850911732 | 2018-07-18T19:55:48Z | MarkusSchulze | See [[Talk:STAR voting#Reversal Symmetry]] |
| 850909847 | 2018-07-18T19:40:43Z | MarkusSchulze | See [[Talk:STAR voting#Majority Criterion]] |
| 850456180 | 2018-07-16T00:17:21Z | Chad The Goatman | /* See also */ |
| 850455801 | 2018-07-16T00:12:55Z | Chad The Goatman | /* See also */ |
| 850455764 | 2018-07-16T00:12:32Z | Chad The Goatman | /* See also */ |
| 850455750 | 2018-07-16T00:12:23Z | Chad The Goatman | /* See also */ |
| 850395797 | 2018-07-15T16:26:49Z | Omegatron | 1. STAR's related to Score, but not a sub-type 2. IRV is a type of ranked system. This is about the type of ballot, no the US name |
| 850373156 | 2018-07-15T13:19:09Z | Homunq | /* Example */ more on strategy |
| 850372927 | 2018-07-15T13:16:54Z | Homunq | /* Political use */ CES affiliation incorrectly implies endorsement. |
| 850296031 | 2018-07-15T00:27:32Z | Chad The Goatman | |
| 850295091 | 2018-07-15T00:17:46Z | 2600:1700:8D0:12F0:243B:1BFE:222C:F78F | RCV in US |
| 850255932 | 2018-07-14T19:04:33Z | Omegatron | /* Properties */ reword |
| 850255036 | 2018-07-14T19:00:18Z | Omegatron | add link |
| 850254913 | 2018-07-14T18:59:42Z | Omegatron | /* Example */ STAR and Score agree on this example. Put strategy after comparison. |
| 850247993 | 2018-07-14T18:19:01Z | Actia Nicopolis | ([[c:GR|GR]]) [[c:COM:FR|File renamed]]: [[File:Score Runoff Voting sample presidential ballot.png]] → [[File:STAR Voting sample ballot.png]] [[c:COM:FR#FR2|Criterion 2]] (meaningless or ambiguous name) · The term "Score Runoff Voting" is obsolete; it's called STAR Voting now. |
| 850236498 | 2018-07-14T16:48:34Z | Omegatron | no need for regular score voting ballot image when there's a STAR voting version |
| 850233615 | 2018-07-14T16:25:27Z | Omegatron | /* Types */ Update image caption to "STAR" |
| 850232585 | 2018-07-14T16:16:10Z | Omegatron | /* Political use */ mention alternative name |
| 850224947 | 2018-07-14T15:00:29Z | Omegatron | cleanup refs, hot or not is not an example (and looks like a dating site now?) |
| 850223386 | 2018-07-14T14:45:14Z | Omegatron | allusion to 5-star ratings, hybrid of rated/ranked |
| 850168501 | 2018-07-14T03:00:29Z | Chad The Goatman | /* Usage */ |
| 850168333 | 2018-07-14T02:58:25Z | Chad The Goatman | |
| 849697701 | 2018-07-10T18:42:29Z | Homunq | a bit more on strategy. |
| 849697368 | 2018-07-10T18:39:35Z | Homunq | Initial version — modeled after [[Score Voting]] |
