You can edit almost every page by Creating an account and confirming your email.

Edithistory:Transcendental Imaging

From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki
oldid date/time username edit summary
874926696 2018-12-22T15:01:00Z ThatMontrealIP rem redlink category
874913408 2018-12-22T12:24:00Z Dan Van Carloads added a category 'Impossible trident'
874864975 2018-12-22T02:39:19Z JJMC89 -[[Category:Artificial imagination]]; ±[[Category:Artificial Intelligence]]→[[Category:Artificial intelligence]] using [[WP:HC|HotCat]]
874841031 2018-12-21T22:25:14Z Timtempleton fix punctuation
874840962 2018-12-21T22:24:37Z Timtempleton fixed ref error
874817118 2018-12-21T18:43:51Z Dan Van Carloads forgot to put the word 'category' in
874817020 2018-12-21T18:42:37Z Dan Van Carloads I've added the category 'artificial intelligence' I don't know why 'artificial imagination' isn't recognised as a category when there is a page
874771415 2018-12-21T12:36:59Z Dan Van Carloads Dan Van Carloads moved page [[Stott's Theorem of The Pictorial Condition]] to [[Transcendental Imaging]]
874771294 2018-12-21T12:36:12Z Dan Van Carloads I'm trying to change the title from 'Stott's Theorem of the Pictorial Condition' to 'transcendental imaging' but I can't seem to do it.
874771005 2018-12-21T12:34:11Z Dan Van Carloads
874709379 2018-12-21T01:46:12Z JJMC89 cleanup
874709078 2018-12-21T01:42:15Z JJMC89 JJMC89 moved page [[Draft:Transcendental Imaging]] to [[Stott's Theorem of The Pictorial Condition]] without leaving a redirect: at AfD
874647856 2018-12-20T17:08:11Z Dan Van Carloads Dan Van Carloads moved page [[Stott's Theorem of The Pictorial Condition]] to [[Draft:Transcendental Imaging]]: I've decided to move page back to draft until I add some explanatory drawings and explanations.
874647656 2018-12-20T17:06:25Z Dan Van Carloads I have changed the title of the article to 'transcendental imaging' because this is the media-recognized phrase for this theory of the pictorial condition. I have changed the introduction accordingly. I have got rid of rule 2 because whilst it is a theory of the pictorial condition applicable to the model it not essential to the theory of transcendental imaging as it is technically covered by saying that the theory applies to all 2D data fields. I have also added an additional category.
874637422 2018-12-20T15:39:11Z Dan Van Carloads tried to get the categories in the right place
874636941 2018-12-20T15:35:20Z Dan Van Carloads
874636445 2018-12-20T15:31:19Z Dan Van Carloads I've added three categories. I now aim to check all the points according to any deletion issue in next 36 hours.
874525363 2018-12-19T20:40:49Z Bakazaka fix broken link in nom header
874454545 2018-12-19T10:28:16Z Pontificalibus Nominated for deletion; see [[:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stott's Theorem of The Pictorial Condition]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])
874454247 2018-12-19T10:24:47Z Dan Van Carloads I have removed the deletion notice. The article does not contain original research, it's content is verified in the UK Patent office approved patent application 2006 see link and in the article see link. I aim to address the concerns soon(I'm busy with Traveling right now) by some explanatory notes. It's very simple statements on the level of 1+1=2 not rocket science.
874451478 2018-12-19T09:51:56Z Pontificalibus Proposing article for deletion per [[WP:PROD]]. ([[WP:TW|TW]])
874218007 2018-12-17T21:41:32Z Dan Van Carloads changed 'where to 'that'
874191951 2018-12-17T18:57:02Z Dan Van Carloads added a link plus put a 's' on representation
874145646 2018-12-17T12:36:31Z Dan Van Carloads line space change
874143988 2018-12-17T12:16:05Z Dan Van Carloads qualified the term 'depict' in rule one
874105426 2018-12-17T04:36:10Z Bearcat Added {{[[:Template:uncategorized|uncategorized]]}} tag to article ([[WP:TW|TW]])
874095997 2018-12-17T03:04:26Z Ronhjones Added {{confusing}}, {{incomprehensible}}, {{notability}}, {{one source}}, {{primary sources}}, {{refimprove}}, {{technical}} and {{third-party}} tags (within {{multiple issues}}) to article ([[WP:TW|TW]])
874071329 2018-12-16T23:21:22Z Dan Van Carloads Dan Van Carloads moved page [[Draft:The pictorial condition]] to [[Stott's Theorem of The Pictorial Condition]]: I've re-thought the page and now I think it's ready to go public.
874071069 2018-12-16T23:19:15Z Dan Van Carloads line change (space)
874070966 2018-12-16T23:18:29Z Dan Van Carloads line change
874070875 2018-12-16T23:17:33Z Dan Van Carloads moving a phrase
874070685 2018-12-16T23:15:52Z Dan Van Carloads line change plus title change
874070290 2018-12-16T23:12:41Z Dan Van Carloads
874067276 2018-12-16T22:46:36Z Dan Van Carloads /* External links */
874066143 2018-12-16T22:37:27Z Dan Van Carloads
874065862 2018-12-16T22:35:14Z Dan Van Carloads A complete re-think and re-write of the page including a different title
874061639 2018-12-16T22:01:10Z Dan Van Carloads Dan Van Carloads moved page [[The pictorial condition]] to [[Draft:The pictorial condition]] over redirect
873886394 2018-12-15T19:06:59Z Dan Van Carloads Dan Van Carloads moved page [[Draft:The pictorial condition]] to [[The pictorial condition]]: The draft page is ready
873865458 2018-12-15T16:02:47Z Dan Van Carloads I've further clarified points 1 to 3 on part two regarding fulfilling an isomorphic pictorial function and adjusted part 3 to include both shape and shapes.
873863684 2018-12-15T15:46:38Z Dan Van Carloads changed the wording of point 3 of part 1 to tally with the other points.
873862749 2018-12-15T15:38:47Z Dan Van Carloads re-put two headings in bold type
873862328 2018-12-15T15:35:21Z Dan Van Carloads I've completely re-written part two on the pictorial condition and its matrix
873840782 2018-12-15T12:50:34Z Dan Van Carloads I've split point 1 of part two and added point 4.
873835986 2018-12-15T12:20:22Z Dan Van Carloads complete re-write of point 1 of part two.
873834545 2018-12-15T12:08:41Z Dan Van Carloads removed a phrase of part two
873834385 2018-12-15T12:06:34Z Dan Van Carloads removed surplus words in point 8
873834180 2018-12-15T12:04:18Z Dan Van Carloads removed a sentence covered elsewhere in point 7.
873833806 2018-12-15T12:00:50Z Dan Van Carloads added '2D' in point 3.
873833466 2018-12-15T11:57:47Z Dan Van Carloads changed 'any' to 'an' in point 3.
873833036 2018-12-15T11:52:25Z Dan Van Carloads I've edited part 3 just to say '2D data field'
873832843 2018-12-15T11:50:10Z Dan Van Carloads line space change.
873832727 2018-12-15T11:49:02Z Dan Van Carloads I've re-worded the pictorial condition and removed surplus sentences in points 1,2 and 3 covered by part two of the pictorial condition and point 2 of said condition covered by part three, plus in point 5 there is no empirical proof of one shape representing plural.
873733946 2018-12-14T18:35:51Z Dan Van Carloads I've had to re-write point 1 of part 2 of the pictorial condition again. I think that might be the final edit, let's see.
873726778 2018-12-14T17:46:23Z Dan Van Carloads added a missed out 'an isomorphic' to point 3, removed hyphen to spell coordinates and added 'pictorial' to part two
873724282 2018-12-14T17:32:22Z Dan Van Carloads Replaces missing terms in points 1 2 and 3
873720604 2018-12-14T17:09:55Z Dan Van Carloads spacing change on page
873720020 2018-12-14T17:06:22Z Dan Van Carloads further qualification of matrix part two.
873718579 2018-12-14T16:57:44Z Dan Van Carloads typo correction 'of' instead of 'o'
873718181 2018-12-14T16:55:53Z Dan Van Carloads moved a line further down in the text.
873717827 2018-12-14T16:54:14Z Dan Van Carloads I've re-written the condition and points of the matrix to get rid of all punctuation and superfluous sentences plus I have added parts two and three to deal with the subject of pictorial signs and symbols.
873670055 2018-12-14T11:02:47Z Dan Van Carloads In points 1,2 and 3 I have qualified the relationships as singular first and specific, replacing 'any' with 'an' and 'a', plus removing the plural also from shape.
873666361 2018-12-14T10:28:03Z Dan Van Carloads Points 1,,2 and 3 i have further qualified the terms relating to '2D data field' plus removed 's' from representations. 4. 'any' 5. 'a' 6. removed a phrase and added 'in a 2D data field, 6. 'that may facilitate isomorphic'
873615687 2018-12-14T01:13:14Z Dan Van Carloads I've added 'or said 2D shape/s in situ' to point 1 as well.
873603751 2018-12-13T23:43:15Z Dan Van Carloads I've re-written point 5 to qualify how a number of shapes might represent one object or one shape might represent a number of objects
873597817 2018-12-13T23:11:48Z Dan Van Carloads I've further qualified points 1,2 and 3 to emphasize that isomorphic nature of what can be described. I've put a further point (8) to say that the terms and conditions only apply to the visible and not to any notion of hidden or overlapping geometric projections.
873592359 2018-12-13T22:43:20Z Dan Van Carloads I've deleted the point about the western enlightenment as it is not about the main thrust of that movement. I've made the paragraph about spatial inference a part of the terms and conditions and re-written it.
873519548 2018-12-13T16:33:36Z Dan Van Carloads I've removed the phrase 'according to the rules of perspective from point 5 because it's already been stated in the description of the pictorial condition
873518379 2018-12-13T16:24:21Z Dan Van Carloads I've changed the 'the' to an 'a' before 2D data field. I've re-written point 4.
873508322 2018-12-13T15:03:19Z Dan Van Carloads I have completely re-written points 1 to 5 of the matrix description.
873493903 2018-12-13T13:23:40Z Dan Van Carloads I have changed 'the discovery of perspective' to 'the rediscovery of perspective' and qualified 'art' as '2D art' in the same sentence.
873490628 2018-12-13T13:02:58Z Dan Van Carloads in points 1 ans 2 I have replaced the word 'the' with 'said'
873486151 2018-12-13T12:34:46Z Dan Van Carloads I have added the phrase 'belonging to the 2D data field' in points 1,2 and 3 and added the phrase 'in the 2D data field to point 5 and placed the phrase 'according to the rules of perspective' at the end of the sentence.
873484319 2018-12-13T12:23:34Z Dan Van Carloads In points 2 and 3 I have replaced the words 'adjoining' and 'neighboring' with 'adjacent' and removed the phrase 'projected or not' from point 3 because it is irrelevant to that point.
873477598 2018-12-13T11:42:53Z Dan Van Carloads I have included the words 'apparent' and 'simple' with regard to the inference of spatial orientation and Cartesian extrusion and replace the word 'the' with 'any' in front of the phrase 'apparent Cartesian extrusion.'
873474313 2018-12-13T11:23:50Z Dan Van Carloads In points 1,2 and 3, I have removed the phrase 'the edge of'
873471218 2018-12-13T11:04:26Z Dan Van Carloads I have re-described point 6 putting the bit about visual chaos as 'plus any other conglomerates of 2D shapes seemingly random or otherwise.'
873469104 2018-12-13T10:49:50Z 92.41.88.123 I've replaced 'i.e.' with 'e.g.' on point 6.
873468066 2018-12-13T10:42:09Z Dan Van Carloads I've further qualified points 1, 2 and 3 of the matrix to include the phrase 'All geometric projections from the' and '(projected or not)(2&3)' and 'projected' shape'/s', plus I have replaced 'the' with 'any' I've removed the 'a' in front of 'pictorial facility'
873309247 2018-12-12T11:27:41Z Dan Van Carloads I've added 'a priori' to point 6. because it is a logical deduction. I've also added an example of how an inference of spatial orientation can affect Cartesian extrusion beyond the perpendicular of mere 'forwards and backwards' 'up down' and 'side of side' regarding pictorial evaluation of 2D data.
873204015 2018-12-11T19:02:38Z Dan Van Carloads
873198026 2018-12-11T18:18:30Z Dan Van Carloads Update of academic article