📜 Post with us on Reddit
📝 Create a new article
🏭 Create a company page
🇬🇧 - in English
🇫🇷 - en Français (FR)
🇵🇹 - em Português (PT)
🇩🇪 - auf Deutsch (DE)
🇯🇵 - 日本語で (JA)
Sponsored articles

You can edit almost every page by Creating an account and confirming your email.

FBI Section 702 query violations

From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki





FBI Section 702 query violations were a series of compliance failures by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) involving warrantless searches of communications collected under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Between 2020 and early 2022, Bureau personnel conducted more than 278,000 searches of surveillance databases that did not meet legal standards.[1][2][3][4]

The queries targeted Black Lives Matter protesters, January 6 Capitol attack participants, congressional campaign donors, journalists, members of Congress, and crime victims. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) characterized these as "persistent and widespread violations."[1][5] The revelations, disclosed publicly in May and July 2023 through declassified FISC opinions, triggered congressional debate over Section 702's April 2024 reauthorization. A proposed warrant requirement for such searches failed by a single vote in the House of Representatives.[6][7]

Background on Section 702

Section 702 of FISA, enacted in 2008 as part of the FISA Amendments Act, authorizes targeted intelligence collection of foreign intelligence information from non-U.S. persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States.[8] Unlike traditional FISA warrants requiring individualized probable cause determinations, Section 702 operates through annual certifications approved by the FISC, which reviews general targeting, minimization, and querying procedures rather than individual surveillance targets. The National Security Agency (NSA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), FBI, and National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) collect communications through two primary methods: PRISM (direct collection from internet service providers) and upstream collection (from internet backbone infrastructure).

Under the statute, intentionally targeting U.S. persons or anyone located in the United States or "reverse targeting" or surveilling foreigners in order to collect information about Americans is prohibited.[8] However, when foreigners under Section 702 surveillance communicate with Americans, those U.S. person communications are "incidentally collected" and stored in intelligence databases. Intelligence agencies can then query these databases using American identifiers. These are known as "backdoor searches" or "U.S. person queries" to retrieve Americans' communications without obtaining warrants.[8][9] By 2022, approximately 246,000 foreign targets were under Section 702 surveillance, increasing to 292,000 by 2024.[10]

Intelligence value

The U.S. intelligence community and successive presidential administrations have described Section 702 as among the most valuable intelligence collection authorities available. FBI Director Christopher A. Wray told Congress in December 2023 that Section 702 had helped disrupt terrorist attacks, identify foreign spies, and track fentanyl shipments.[11][12]

In a joint statement, DNI Avril Haines and NSA Director Paul Nakasone called Section 702 a source of "critical foreign intelligence" on threats including terrorism, weapons proliferation, and hostile cyber activities.[13] During the April 2024 reauthorization debate, intelligence officials briefed House members on specific cases including identification of a Chinese fentanyl precursor shipment 48 hours before arrival and disruption of a plot by Iranian operatives to assassinate a U.S. official on American soil.[7]

Attorney General Merrick Garland personally lobbied members of Congress against warrant requirements, with the Biden administration characterizing Section 702 as "indispensable" to national security.[7]

Supporters argued that the FBI's U.S. person queries despite compliance failures produced actionable intelligence. In 2023, the FBI stated queries helped identify ransomware actors targeting U.S. critical infrastructure and foreign agents seeking to recruit Americans with security clearances.[14] The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, while recommending reforms, concluded that Section 702 "remains highly valuable to protect national security" and "has proven to be a valuable tool in the government's efforts to protect national security."[15]

Critics countered that the intelligence community had not identified specific cases where warrantless searches of Americans' communications, rather than foreign target surveillance, proved essential to preventing attacks. They argued warrant requirements would not impede legitimate intelligence collection.[16][17]

Scale and timeline of violations

Peak violation period (2020–2021)

Compliance problems peaked between late 2020 and early 2021. During this period, Bureau analysts ran more than 278,000 queries of Section 702 data that the Department of Justice later determined violated FBI standards, as was documented in an April 21, 2022, FISC memorandum opinion authored by Judge Rudolph Contreras and declassified in May 2023.[1][2][18] The Department of Justice National Security Division determined these searches violated the FBI's own standard requiring queries to be "reasonably likely to retrieve foreign intelligence information or evidence of a crime."[1][5]

Agents ran queries lacking adequate factual justification across numerous categories. Between late 2016 and early 2020, agents searched individuals listed in local police homicide reports—including victims, next-of-kin, witnesses, and suspects—with no connection to foreign actors or federal crimes.[1] In another instance, an analyst queried over 23,000 terms in an apparent effort to find "possible foreign influence" despite having no specific indications of such influence.[1][3] Analysts also queried defense contractors "despite no specific information indicating that the named companies were being targeted by foreign adversaries."[1]

The violations extended to FBI community outreach programs: personnel queried over 120 individuals who requested to participate in the FBI's Citizens Academy, a program designed to educate the public about the Bureau's work.[1][19] Agents also searched people who came to FBI field offices to perform repairs, report tips, or seek victim assistance.[1]

Query volume statistics

In 2021, the FBI conducted approximately 2.9 million U.S. person queries, though roughly 1.9 million involved a single batch query related to potential victims of Russian cyber activity targeting U.S. critical infrastructure.[20][8][21] Even excluding this batch, over one million queries occurred unrelated to the cyber incident.[20]

Following implementation of reforms in mid-2021, query numbers dropped sharply: from 2.9 million in 2021 to 119,383 in 2022 (a 96% decrease), then to 57,094 in 2023, and to approximately 5,500 in 2024, a 90% reduction from 2022 levels.[20][22]

Despite these reductions, compliance issues persisted. In 2022, approximately 4,000 backdoor searches still violated FBI rules, representing roughly a 2% non-compliance rate.[20] By 2023, compliance had improved to 98–99% according to FISC assessments and Department of Justice reports.[23]

Searches of political figures and donors

An FBI analyst ran a batch query of over 19,000 donors to a congressional campaign.[1][24][3] The analyst claimed "the campaign was a target of foreign influence," but DOJ National Security Division reviewers determined that only eight identifiers had sufficient ties to foreign influence activities to comply with the querying standard.[1] By law, campaign donors must be U.S. citizens or permanent residents.[25] The identity of the congressional campaign was not publicly disclosed.

Representative Darin LaHood (R-Illinois) publicly revealed in March 2023 that he believed he was a member of Congress improperly queried by the FBI.[26][27][28] According to a 2021 Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) compliance report declassified in December 2022, FBI personnel conducted multiple queries on an unnamed congressman using only his last name. While the queries were assessed as conducted for foreign intelligence purposes, they were deemed "overly broad" and noncompliant with querying standards. LaHood stated at a March 9, 2023 House Intelligence Committee hearing: "It is my opinion that the member of Congress that was wrongfully queried multiple times solely by his name was in fact me."[28][26]

Racial justice protesters

Agents queried 133 people arrested during protests following George Floyd's death in late May 2020.[1][18][29][3] According to the April 2022 FISC opinion, FBI personnel sought to determine if there was "any counter-terrorism derogatory information on the arrestees" but ran the queries "without any specific potential connections to terrorist related activity known to those who conducted the searches."[1]

Initially, the FBI defended these searches as compliant with its standards but later reversed position after a DOJ review. [1] These searches occurred during nationwide Black Lives Matter protests following Floyd's murder by Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin.

January 6 Capitol attack participants

Bureau staff ran more than 20,000 queries on individuals affiliated with groups suspected of involvement in the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.[1][18][4][3] According to the FISC, these searches were conducted without specific potential connections to foreign terrorist-related activity.[1]Judge Contreras's April 2022 opinion described "tens of thousands" of unlawful searches related to civil unrest during this period.[1][5]

Searches of a U.S. Senator and state officials (2022)

Violations involving high-profile targets continued even after the FBI implemented reforms in 2021–2022. In June 2022 just nine months after reform implementation, an analyst ran four queries using the last names of a sitting U.S. Senator and a state senator "without further limitation."[23][30][31][32]Although the analyst claimed information that a specific foreign intelligence service was targeting those legislators, the DOJ National Security Division determined the searches were overly broad, lacked sufficient tailoring, and did not meet the querying standard.[23] The FBI notified the U.S. Senator but not the state senator. [30] The identities of both officials were not publicly disclosed.

On October 25, 2022, a Staff Operations Specialist ran a query using the Social Security number of a state judge who had complained to the FBI about alleged civil rights violations perpetrated by a municipal chief of police.[23][30] The search was determined to have lacked adequate justification and did not receive required pre-approval. The FBI did not notify the judge.[30] Both violations were disclosed in an April 2023 FISC opinion released July 21, 2023.[23]

Other sensitive searches

FISC opinions documented numerous additional improper searches, including multiple queries of journalists, searches using names of an entire local political party, and queries of homicide victims and their families.[1][33] Earlier violations included over 70,000 queries in March 2017 related to security reviews of people requiring FBI building access[34] and 6,800 Social Security number queries on a single day in December 2017.[35]

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court findings

Judge James E. Boasberg opinions (2018–2020)

FISC Presiding Judge James Boasberg issued multiple opinions documenting FBI violations before the 2020–2021 peak. In October 2018, he found FBI queries "inconsistent with statutory minimization requirements and the requirements of the Fourth Amendment."[36][35] The 138-page ruling identified tens of thousands of improper FBI searches during 2017 and early 2018.[36][34]

A November 2020 ruling documented 40 FBI queries for investigations unrelated to foreign surveillance, including "healthcare fraud, transnational organized crime, violent gangs, domestic terrorism involving racially motivated violent extremists, as well as investigations relating to public corruption and bribery."[37][33] The court found the FBI's "failure to properly apply its querying standard when searching section 702-acquired information was more pervasive than was previously believed."[33] Despite expressing concern about "apparent widespread violations," Boasberg approved Section 702 certifications for another year based on FBI promises of corrective measures.[33]

Judge Rudolph Contreras opinions (2022–2023)

In April 2022, Judge Rudolph Contreras issued a memorandum opinion (declassified May 2023) detailing the 278,000+ non-compliant queries during 2020–2021.[1][2][3][4] The opinion stated: "Compliance problems with the querying of Section 702 information have proven to be persistent and widespread."[1][5] Contreras warned that if violations continued, "it may become necessary to consider other responses, such as substantially limiting the number of FBI personnel with access to unminimized Section 702 information."[1]

Despite the violations, Contreras approved the FBI's querying procedures as implemented. The judge noted the FBI had undertaken remedial measures in 2021–2022 and compliance was improving, though serious problems remained.[1][18]

By April 2023, Contreras had documented the June and October 2022 searches of the U.S. Senator, state senator, and state judge.[23][30][31] While acknowledging continued violations, the court found reason to believe "the FBI has been doing a better job in applying the querying standard."[23] The FISC calculated an approximately 1.8% noncompliance rate, equivalent to 98.2% compliance, an improvement from earlier periods. Of nearly 80,000 searches audited, roughly 1,400 violated standards.[23]

Fourth Amendment implications

FISC judges repeatedly raised Fourth Amendment concerns about FBI practices. Boasberg's October 2018 opinion found FBI procedures "not consistent with the Fourth Amendment" when applying a "totality of circumstances" standard balancing privacy intrusion against government interests.[36][35] The court criticized the "broad and apparently suspicionless nature" of batch queries and noted FBI's "lack of common understanding" of querying standards.[36]

Legal experts and civil liberties advocates argued that searching through Section 702 databases for particular Americans' communications constitutes a "search" under the Fourth Amendment requiring a warrant based on probable cause.[17][16] The FBI and Department of Justice countered that because the initial Section 702 collection targets foreigners abroad, subsequent queries of already-collected data do not constitute new Fourth Amendment searches requiring warrants.

FBI response and reforms

The "40+ corrective actions"

Following the December 2019 DOJ Inspector General report on the Carter Page FISA investigation, FBI Director Christopher Wray announced he had "ordered more than 40 corrective actions to our FISA policies and procedures."[14][38][39] While Wray repeatedly referenced this figure in congressional testimony, the FBI did not release public documentation breaking down all 40+ individual measures. The publicly disclosed reforms focused on query procedures, training, oversight, and accountability.

Procedural reforms (2021–2022)

Opt-in requirement (Summer 2021): The FBI changed its search systems to require personnel to explicitly opt in to search Section 702 data.[40][20][41] Previously, Section 702 information was included by default in all FBI database searches.[41] This change drove much of the query reduction from 2.9 million in 2021 to 119,000 in 2022.[20][22][42]

Batch query pre-approval: Beginning in 2021, FBI attorney pre-approval became required for batch queries involving more than 100 query terms.[43][42] In June 2023, Deputy Director Paul Abbate announced expansion of this requirement to all batch queries regardless of size, since large batch queries had been a source of non-compliant searches.[43]

Sensitive query approval hierarchy: The FBI implemented escalating approval requirements for sensitive searches.[43][41] FBI Deputy Director approval is now required for queries involving U.S. elected officials, presidential or gubernatorial appointees, political candidates, political organizations, and members of the news media. FBI attorney approval is required for queries involving religious organizations and certain other categories.

Enhanced documentation requirements: FBI systems now require written justifications for all U.S. person queries demonstrating they meet the three-prong standard: authorized purpose, reasonably designed, and specific factual basis that the query is "reasonably likely to retrieve foreign intelligence information or evidence of a crime."[43][41] Personnel must enter justifications before conducting searches.

Training programs

In November 2021, the FBI issued FISA Query Guidance to all national security personnel, along with a two-page "FBI FISA Query Guidance Nutshell" desk reference.[43][41] The FBI developed the guidance jointly with DOJ National Security Division and ODNI. Mandatory training based on this guidance launched in December 2021, with all personnel required to complete it by end of January 2022 to maintain access to FISA systems.[43][41] Annual recertification training became required starting December 2022, with completion serving as a gating requirement—failure to complete training results in loss of system access.[43][41]

Office of Internal Auditing

In August 2020, Attorney General William Barr established the FBI's Office of Internal Auditing (OIA) in direct response to Inspector General Horowitz's findings.[44][45][46] The office conducts continuous internal compliance reviews and routine audits of Section 702 queries, FISA minimization procedures, and National Security Letter usage.[45] The OIA's first audit (April 2020–March 2021) established an 82% compliance baseline before reforms. A subsequent audit found 96% compliance post-reforms—a 14 percentage point improvement.[44][42]

Accountability measures

In June 2023, the FBI announced a "three-strike policy" for unintentional violations.[43][47] First violations result in immediate suspension of FISA access, mandatory remedial training, written acknowledgment, and supervisor counseling. Second violations trigger extended suspension (minimum 30 days), additional training, performance improvement plans, and impact on performance reviews. Third violations lead to potential dismissal, mandatory senior leadership review, and consideration of security clearance revocation. Intentional or reckless violations result in immediate investigation and penalties up to dismissal with potential criminal referral.[43]

In October 2023, the FBI implemented the Field Office Health Measure (FOHM), making FISA compliance performance a factor in evaluating Special Agents in Charge and Assistant Directors in Charge.[43][47] Compliance now affects eligibility for promotion and annual bonuses, creating leadership accountability for field office performance.

Director Wray's public statements

FBI Director Christopher Wray defended the FBI's reform efforts while acknowledging past failures. In December 5, 2023 Senate Judiciary Committee testimony, Wray stated: "These violations never should have happened and preventing recurrence is a matter of utmost priority. The FBI took these episodes seriously and responded rigorously, already yielding significant results in dramatically reducing the number of 'U.S. person queries' by the FBI of the Section 702 database and in substantially improving its compliance rate."[12][11]

Wray emphasized compliance improvements: "The most recent Justice Department report found the reforms working, 99% compliance."[12] However, he opposed warrant requirement proposals, arguing they "would amount to a de facto ban" because applications either would not meet legal standards or would require "expenditure of scarce resources, submission and review of lengthy legal filings, and passage of significant time—which, in the world of rapidly evolving threats, the government often does not have."[12][48][49]

Oversight and investigations

DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz

Inspector General Horowitz documented FISA compliance failures through multiple reports and congressional testimony. His December 2019 "Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation" identified 17 significant inaccuracies and omissions in FISA applications targeting Carter Page, finding FBI personnel "fell far short" of requirements that applications be "scrupulously accurate."[50][51][52]

Horowitz's March 2020 Management Advisory Memorandum and final September 2021 Woods Procedures Audit Report found over 400 instances of non-compliance with factual accuracy requirements in just 29 FISA applications reviewed.[53][54][55] The audit also revealed 183 FISA applications (out of over 7,000 authorized between January 2015 and March 2020) were missing required Woods Files documentation either partially or entirely.[54][55]

At an April 27, 2023 House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing titled "Fixing FISA: How a Law Designed to Protect Americans Has Been Weaponized Against Them," Horowitz testified on three oversight needs: effective supervisory review in real time, effective routine internal oversight to identify errors close to occurrence, and periodic external independent reviews by the Inspector General and other oversight entities.[40][56]

A September 2022 Horowitz report on the FBI Office of General Counsel revealed that for several years, DOJ National Security Division and FBI OGC maintained differing interpretations of the Section 702 query standard.[40] This confusion led to numerous compliance incidents and, according to a senior FBI OGC official cited in the report, the FBI "almost losing its Section 702 authorities."[40]

Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB), an independent executive branch agency, released a 373-page Section 702 report on September 28, 2023.[15][57][58] The report, led by Chair Sharon Bradford Franklin, concluded Section 702 "remains highly valuable to protect national security" but creates "serious privacy and civil liberties risks," with the most serious risks arising from U.S. person queries and batch queries.[15]

The PCLOB found that FBI conducted over 200,000 U.S. person queries in 2022—more than the CIA, NSA, and NCTC combined, which collectively conducted only several thousand queries.[15] The board could not obtain government estimates of how many Americans' communications were incidentally collected under Section 702.[15]

The PCLOB issued 19 recommendations (adopted by 3–2 vote), with the most significant calling for FISC authorization of U.S. person query terms before searches could be conducted, with exceptions only for consent and exigent circumstances.[15][58] Other recommendations included codifying prohibition on "abouts" collection, ensuring each batch query term individually meets standards, and requiring DOJ to annually review each FBI field office's compliance.

Chair Franklin issued a separate statement recommending a probable cause standard for FBI queries seeking evidence of crime, arguing "search through Section 702 communications data seeking information about a particular American constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment" requiring traditional warrant protections.[15] Two board members—Beth Williams and Richard DiZinno—dissented, calling the policy analysis "deeply flawed" and arguing the report "undervalues key aspects of the program, especially U.S. person queries."[15][59]

Congressional oversight

Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) and Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) led efforts to impose warrant requirements through the Security and Freedom Enhancement (SAFE) Act.[60][61] Durbin stated, "I will only support the reauthorization of Section 702 if there are significant reforms," focusing on addressing "warrantless surveillance of Americans in violation of the Fourth Amendment."[61]

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) criticized the FBI, repeatedly citing the "204,000 improper searches" figure in hearings and public statements.[62] Jordan questioned whether the FBI should query databases on American citizens at all. His committee advanced legislation including warrant requirements, while the House Intelligence Committee under Chairman Mike Turner (R-Ohio) produced competing bills with more modest reforms favored by the intelligence community.

The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by Mark Warner (D-Virginia), advanced the FISA Reform and Reauthorization Act with more limited reforms.[63] Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chair Marco Rubio (R-Florida) co-sponsored this approach. Senate critics including Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) who pushed for more substantial privacy protections.[64]

Impact on Section 702 reauthorization

The 2023–2024 legislative battle

Section 702 was set to expire on December 31, 2023. These compliance failures complicated what intelligence officials expected to be routine reauthorization, with coalitions of progressive Democrats and libertarian-conservative Republicans united in opposition to renewal without reforms.[65][66]

In December 2023, Congress inserted a four-month extension into the National Defense Authorization Act after Speaker Mike Johnson pulled competing bills from the floor when the House Rules Committee refused to allow simultaneous votes.[65][67] The new expiration date of April 19, 2024, set the stage for final negotiations.[65][67]

The warrant amendment tie vote

On April 12, 2024, the House voted on the Biggs-Jayapal amendment requiring warrants for backdoor searches. The vote tied 212–212—the closest Congress has come to requiring warrants for such searches.[6][7][68][69] The tie meant the amendment failed. The breakdown showed 128 Republicans and 84 Democrats voting yes, while 86 Republicans and 126 Democrats voted no, reflecting cross-party divisions.[6][7] Speaker Johnson cast no vote but later indicated opposition.

The Biden administration lobbied against the warrant requirement, with Attorney General Merrick Garland making personal calls to members on the morning of the vote.[7] Administration officials circulated memos calling the amendment a "threat to national security" and "reckless policy choice." Intelligence officials briefed members in classified settings near the House floor, citing specific cases including a Chinese fentanyl precursor shipment identified through a 702 query just 48 hours before arrival.[7]

Warrant requirement supporters, including Representatives Andy Biggs (R-Arizona), Pramila Jayapal (D-Washington), Jordan, and Jerry Nadler (D-New York), argued the FBI's 278,000 violations demonstrated internal reforms were insufficient and judicial oversight was essential to protect Fourth Amendment rights.[69] Polling showed approximately 75% of Americans supported warrant requirements. Opponents argued warrant applications would either fail to meet legal standards or take too long to process during time-sensitive national security threats, effectively creating a "de facto ban" on a vital intelligence tool.

Final passage of RISAA

The Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (RISAA, H.R. 7888) passed the House 273–147 on April 12, 2024.[70][71][72] The final bill required FBI supervisor or attorney approval for all U.S. person queries and barred political appointees from the approval process. Enhanced approval requirements applied to sensitive queries involving elected officials, media, and religious organizations. The legislation prohibited queries "solely designed to find evidence of criminal activity" (with narrow exceptions), codified annual training requirements, and mandated that the FBI Director report annually to Congress on accountability actions. The DOJ Inspector General must assess FBI compliance and reform effectiveness by October 2025.

RISAA also expanded the definition of "electronic communication service provider" potentially requiring hotels, libraries, and coffee shops with WiFi to assist surveillance—a provision Senator Ron Wyden called "the most dramatic and terrifying expansion of government surveillance authority in history."[73][74]

Senators voted in the early morning hours of April 20, 2024, with final passage at approximately 12:40 AM, just 40 minutes after the midnight statutory deadline.[75][76][74] Multiple reform amendments failed, including the Durbin-Cramer warrant requirement amendment (42–50, needing 60 votes)[77][78] and the Wyden amendment to strike the expanded ECSP definition (34–58).[73]

The Senate approved RISAA 60–34, with bipartisan support from Intelligence Committee leaders Warner and Rubio, and opposition from civil liberties advocates including Durbin, Wyden, Paul, Lee, and Cruz.[75][79][80] President Biden signed the bill into law on April 20, 2024, reauthorizing Section 702 through April 20, 2026 (a two-year extension, shortened from five years to accommodate conservative concerns).[81][82]

Continuing controversy

In January 2025, a federal district court ruled that backdoor searches of Section 702 databases ordinarily require warrants, calling the practice a violation of Fourth Amendment protections.[83][84][85][17] This ruling, combined with the shortened two-year reauthorization, means the Section 702 debate will resume in 2026. Civil liberties groups such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation characterized the 212–212 vote as evidence that warrant requirements could succeed in future legislation[86]

Connection to earlier FISA controversies

See also: Inspector General report on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation

The Section 702 violations occurred alongside other FBI FISA compliance failures during the same period. Inspector General Horowitz's December 2019 report on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation documented 17 significant errors in FISA warrant applications targeting Carter Page, finding FBI personnel "fell far short" of accuracy requirements.[50][51] In congressional testimony, Horowitz stated that "in connection with both our Crossfire Hurricane Review and Woods File Audit, we identified inadequate supervisory review as a significant concern," leading to reforms affecting both Title I FISA warrants and Section 702 queries.[40]

Civil liberties advocates drew comparisons to earlier FBI surveillance abuses. The Center for Democracy and Technology stated in May 2023 that "the systemic misuse of this warrantless surveillance tool has made FISA 702 as toxic as COINTELPRO and the FBI abuses of the Hoover years."[87] The Church Committee's 1975 investigation of COINTELPRO abuses had led directly to FISA's creation in 1978.[16]

Civil liberties and constitutional concerns

Civil liberties organizations opposed Section 702 reauthorization without warrant requirements. The American Civil Liberties Union, through attorneys Patrick Toomey and Kia Hamadanchy, argued Section 702 "is routinely used against Americans, immigrants, and people who are not accused of any wrongdoing" and that the FBI "continues to break the rules" despite reform promises.[17]

The Brennan Center for Justice, through analysts including Elizabeth Goitein and Faiza Patel, published documentation arguing Section 702 had "morphed into a domestic surveillance tool" that violated Fourth Amendment prohibitions on warrantless searches.[16][88] A 31-organization coalition including the Brennan Center, ACLU, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Center for Democracy and Technology, and Electronic Privacy Information Center opposed reauthorization without structural reforms.[86][89]

EFF analysts documented the FBI's pattern of making reform promises followed by continued violations: the FBI pledged compliance improvements after revelations in 2013, 2016, 2017, and 2018, yet violations persisted.[86]

Analysts for The Center for Democracy and Technology concluded this pattern indicated "procedural reforms will not break pattern of misuse in the future," requiring statutory warrant requirements with judicial oversight rather than internal FBI policy changes.[90]

Constitutional concerns centered on several issues: the volume of warrantless searches (up to 3.4 million in 2021), use of surveillance for domestic crimes unrelated to national security (healthcare fraud, bribery, public corruption), political surveillance risks (congressional donors, protesters, journalists, elected officials), and lack of individualized suspicion before accessing Americans' communications. Critics argued these practices violated core Fourth Amendment principles requiring warrants based on probable cause before government searches of citizens' private communications.[16][15]

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 Contreras, Rudolph (April 21, 2022). "Memorandum Opinion and Order (2021 FISC Certification Opinion)" (PDF). Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 "U.S. court finds FBI improperly searched foreign intelligence data 278,000 times". Reuters. May 19, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 "FBI misused surveillance tool on Jan. 6 suspects, BLM arrestees and others". The Boston Globe. May 19, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 "FBI misused the Section 702 database on Americans. What is it?". The Washington Post. May 19, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Irwin, Lauren (May 19, 2023). "FBI repeatedly misused surveillance tool, unsealed FISA order reveals". The Hill. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 114 (Biggs Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888)". Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives. April 12, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 Wong, Scott; Kapur, Sahil; Kaplan, Rebecca (April 12, 2024). "House votes to renew FISA spying tool after earlier Republican revolt". NBC News. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 De Luce, Dan; Dilanian, Ken (July 31, 2023). "FISA Section 702: What it is and why Congress is debating it". NBC News. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  9. ↑ "White House panel advises limiting FBI's access to powerful spy tool". The Washington Post. July 31, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  10. ↑ "Annual Statistical Transparency Report". Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 "FBI director Wray to call for renewal of key surveillance tool". NBC News. December 5, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 "Director Wray's Opening Statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee". Federal Bureau of Investigation. December 5, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  13. ↑ "Joint Statement on Section 702 from DNI Haines, NSA Director General Nakasone, and FBI Director Wray". Office of the Director of National Intelligence. 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 "Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and Section 702". Federal Bureau of Investigation. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 15.6 15.7 15.8 "Report on the Surveillance Program Operated Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act" (PDF). Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. September 28, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 Goitein, Elizabeth (2024). "Why Congress Must Reform FISA Section 702 and How It Can". Brennan Center for Justice. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 "Court Rules Warrantless Section 702 Searches Violated the Fourth Amendment" (Press release). American Civil Liberties Union. January 22, 2025. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 Gazis, Olivia (July 21, 2023). "FBI conducted improper searches of U.S. officials in foreign surveillance database". CBS News. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  19. ↑ "Key Takeaways From Latest FISA Court Opinion on Section 702 and FBI Warrantless Queries". Just Security. April 28, 2021. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.5 "Joint Statement on Section 702 Query Statistics". U.S. Department of Justice, National Security Division. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  21. ↑ "Spy report: 3.4M warrantless searches of US data under FISA last year". CyberScoop. April 2022. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 Gazis, Olivia (April 30, 2024). "Number of searches on Americans in FBI foreign intelligence database fell in 2023, report shows". CBS News. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 23.4 23.5 23.6 23.7 Contreras, Rudolph (April 11, 2023). "Memorandum Opinion and Order (2023 FISA Section 702 Certifications Opinion)" (PDF). Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  24. ↑ Spunt, David (May 19, 2023). "FBI improperly used warrantless search powers more than 278,000 times in 2021, FISA court filing reveals". Fox News. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  25. ↑ "Foreign Nationals". Federal Election Commission. Retrieved December 11, 2025.
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 "Republican congressman slams FBI for allegedly searching his name in intelligence database". CNN Politics. March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  27. ↑ "Republican Congressman Darin Lahood says his name was wrongly searched by FBI". The Washington Post. March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 "LaHood Addresses Violations and Need for FISA Reform" (Press release). Office of Rep. Darin LaHood. March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  29. ↑ "The FBI Is Back to Its Old Habits: Illegally Spying on Protesters". The Nation. July 3, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  30. ↑ 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 30.4 "FBI wrongly searched for U.S. senator and state senator in Section 702 spy data, court says". NBC News. July 21, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  31. ↑ 31.0 31.1 "FBI improperly used Section 702 surveillance powers on US senator". The Hill. July 21, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  32. ↑ "FBI improperly used FISA database to search for info about U.S. senator, state officials". Axios. July 21, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 33.2 33.3 Boasberg, James E. (November 18, 2020). "Memorandum Opinion and Order (2020 FISC Certification Opinion)" (PDF). Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  34. ↑ 34.0 34.1 "FISA court found FBI conducted tens of thousands of improper searches of intelligence database". The Hill. October 8, 2019. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  35. ↑ 35.0 35.1 35.2 Volz, Dustin; Tau, Byron (October 8, 2019). "Secret Court Rebukes FBI Over Its Handling of Surveillance Data". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  36. ↑ 36.0 36.1 36.2 36.3 Boasberg, James E. (October 18, 2018). "Memorandum Opinion and Order (2018 Section 702 Certification)" (PDF). Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  37. ↑ Laperruque, Jake (April 28, 2021). "Key Takeaways From Latest FISA Court Opinion on Section 702 and FBI Warrantless Queries". Just Security. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  38. ↑ "FBI queries of foreign spy data fell 94%, amid debate over law". NBC News. July 31, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  39. ↑ "Jordan, Biggs Demand Answers from FBI on Widespread FISA Violations". House Judiciary Committee. May 4, 2021. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  40. ↑ 40.0 40.1 40.2 40.3 40.4 "Statement of Michael E. Horowitz, Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice Before the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary". Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General. September 2022. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  41. ↑ 41.0 41.1 41.2 41.3 41.4 41.5 41.6 Gerstell, Glenn S. (July 7, 2023). "How FBI Querying Under FISA Section 702 Works". Lawfare. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  42. ↑ 42.0 42.1 42.2 "Reforming Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act for a Digital Landscape". Center for Strategic and International Studies. October 15, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  43. ↑ 43.00 43.01 43.02 43.03 43.04 43.05 43.06 43.07 43.08 43.09 "FBI Deputy Director Highlights Bureau's New FISA Query Accountability Procedures" (Press release). Federal Bureau of Investigation. June 13, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  44. ↑ 44.0 44.1 "FBI Releases Results of OIA FISA Query Audit" (Press release). Federal Bureau of Investigation. May 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  45. ↑ 45.0 45.1 "Barr orders more changes in FBI surveillance under FISA". NBC News. September 1, 2020. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  46. ↑ "Barr issues new rules for FBI surveillance warrants of political figures". CBS News. September 1, 2020. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  47. ↑ 47.0 47.1 "Bipartisan Coalition Responds to the FBI's New Policies Under Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Authority". Brennan Center for Justice. June 13, 2023. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  48. ↑ Tarinelli, Ryan (December 5, 2023). "FBI director warns senators on surveillance reauthorization". Roll Call. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  49. ↑ "FBI director makes plea for 702 reauthorization without a warrant requirement". The Hill. December 5, 2023. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  50. ↑ 50.0 50.1 Horowitz, Michael E. (December 9, 2019). "Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation". Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  51. ↑ 51.0 51.1 "Watchdog Report Says FBI Was Justified In Opening Trump-Russia Investigation". NPR. December 9, 2019. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  52. ↑ "Takeaways from the Senate hearing with Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz". CNN. December 11, 2019. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  53. ↑ "Management Advisory Memorandum for the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Regarding the Execution of Woods Procedures for Applications Filed with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Relating to U.S. Persons". Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General. March 31, 2020. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  54. ↑ 54.0 54.1 "Audit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Execution of Its Woods Procedures for the Applications Filed with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Relating to U.S. Persons". Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General. September 30, 2021. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  55. ↑ 55.0 55.1 Klein, Adam I. (January 18, 2023). "What the Inspector General's Latest FISA Report Can (and Can't) Tell Us". Lawfare. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  56. ↑ "Inspector General: FBI's FISA compliance error rate 'around 30 percent'". Washington Examiner. April 27, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  57. ↑ "PCLOB's Split on FISA Section 702, Explained". Lawfare. September 29, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  58. ↑ 58.0 58.1 "Federal privacy watchdog splits on Section 702 surveillance reforms". Stars and Stripes. September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  59. ↑ "Reforming FISA Section 702: Communications searches should require a court order". The Washington Times. October 30, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  60. ↑ "Lee, Durbin Introduce Bipartisan SAFE Act to Reform FISA Section 702" (Press release). Office of Senator Mike Lee. March 14, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  61. ↑ 61.0 61.1 "Durbin Announces Bipartisan Legislation to Reform FISA Section 702" (Press release). Senate Judiciary Committee. March 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  62. ↑ "Looming deadline to extend warrantless surveillance powers sparks congressional scramble". The Hill. November 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  63. ↑ "Two Bills and the Congressional Divide over Section 702 Reauthorization". Lawfare. November 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  64. ↑ "Wyden Urges Colleagues to Reject Expanding Warrantless FISA 702 Surveillance" (Press release). Office of Senator Ron Wyden. April 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  65. ↑ 65.0 65.1 65.2 "Defense policy bill includes short-term extension of controversial government surveillance program". CNN. December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  66. ↑ "Speaker Johnson takes heat from House conservatives over short-term extension of warrantless surveillance powers". The Hill. December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  67. ↑ 67.0 67.1 "Congress passes temporary extension of FISA Section 702 surveillance program". Axios. December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  68. ↑ "House passes modified surveillance bill after it failed earlier this week". CNN. April 12, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  69. ↑ 69.0 69.1 "House approves contentious FISA bill in bipartisan vote". The Hill. April 12, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  70. ↑ "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 119 (H.R. 7888 Final Passage)". Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives. April 12, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  71. ↑ "H.R. 7888 - Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act". Congress.gov. April 20, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  72. ↑ "House approves surveillance authority reauthorization bill". Roll Call. April 12, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  73. ↑ 73.0 73.1 "Wyden and Lummis Introduce Amendment to Roll Back Unprecedented Expansion of Warrantless FISA Surveillance" (Press release). Office of Senator Ron Wyden. April 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  74. ↑ 74.0 74.1 "Senate passes bill renewing key FISA surveillance power moments after it expires". NBC News. April 20, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  75. ↑ 75.0 75.1 "U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 150 (H.R. 7888 Final Passage)". United States Senate. April 19, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  76. ↑ "Biden signs reauthorization of surveillance program into law despite privacy concerns". NPR. April 20, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  77. ↑ "Durbin, Cramer File Bipartisan Amendment to the FISA Reauthorization Bill" (Press release). Office of Senator Dick Durbin. April 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  78. ↑ "Senate duo pushes for warrant requirement in foreign spy bill". The Hill. April 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  79. ↑ "Durbin Votes Against FISA Reauthorization Bill" (Press release). Office of Senator Dick Durbin. April 20, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  80. ↑ "FISA Section 702 Reauthorized for Two Years". Lawfare. April 22, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  81. ↑ "Biden signs bill reauthorizing contentious FISA surveillance program". CBS News. April 20, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  82. ↑ "Biden signs bill that reauthorizes key US surveillance authority". CNN. April 20, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  83. ↑ United States v. Hasbajrami, 2025 WL 447498 (E.D.N.Y. January 21, 2025).
  84. ↑ "FBI's Warrantless Search Ruled Unconstitutional in a Blow to Government Spying". The Intercept. January 27, 2025. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  85. ↑ "Court Says Warrant Needed for U.S. Person Queries of FISA Section 702 Data". Just Security. January 29, 2025. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  86. ↑ 86.0 86.1 86.2 Crocker, Andrew; Guariglia, Matthew (January 22, 2025). "Victory: Federal Court Finally Rules Backdoor Searches of 702 Data Unconstitutional". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  87. ↑ "Shocking New FBI Political Surveillance Disclosures Highlight Need for FISA Reform". Center for Democracy and Technology. May 19, 2023. Retrieved November 25, 2025.
  88. ↑ Goitein, Elizabeth; Patel, Faiza (March 5, 2025). "Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA): Resource Page". Brennan Center for Justice. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  89. ↑ "EPIC Statement on Final Passage of RISAA". Electronic Privacy Information Center. April 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  90. ↑ "CDT, Civil Liberties Groups Endorse Bipartisan Bill to Reform Section 702". Center for Democracy & Technology. Retrieved November 24, 2025.


This article "FBI Section 702 query violations" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:FBI Section 702 query violations. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.


Retrieved from "https://en.everybodywiki.com/index.php?title=FBI_Section_702_query_violations&oldid=6314954"
License CC BY-SA 3.0
Powered by MediaWiki