Inconsistent comparison
Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. (March 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
An inconsistent comparison is a misleading argument popular in advertising. For example, an advertisement might say "product X is less expensive than product A, has better quality than product B, and has more features than product C". This is designed to give the impression that product X is better than products A, B, and C in all respects, but doesn't actually make that claim.[1] In fact, product A may be the most expensive, product B may be the lowest quality, and product C may have the fewest features of the three. So, the original statement really only means "product X is not the most expensive, lowest quality, or fewest featured product on the market". That would hardly be as effective of an advertisement, however.
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- ↑ "Inconsistent comparison:". 15 December 2010. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
This article "Inconsistent comparison" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Inconsistent comparison. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.