📜 Post with us on Reddit
📝 Create a new article
🏭 Create a company page
🇬🇧 - in English
🇫🇷 - en Français (FR)
🇵🇹 - em Português (PT)
🇩🇪 - in Deutsch (DE)
🇯🇵 - 日本語で (JA)
Sponsored articles

You can edit almost every page by Creating an account. Otherwise, see the FAQ.

Lin Zhijian's paper plagiarism case

From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki

Lin Zhijian (photographed in 2020)

Lin Zhijian's paper plagiarism case [lower-alpha 1] is an academic dishonesty incident in Taiwan's history. In July 2022, Lin Zhijian, a recent Department of Science graduate and Technology Management of Chung Hua University and the National Development Institute of National Taiwan University with two master's degrees and who announced participation in the mayoral election of Taoyuan City was accused by Wang Hongwei and others of copying two thesis. Zhonghua University and Taiwan University, respectively, both concluded that Lin Zhijian's thesis involved plagiarism and violated academic integrity, and their master's degree was revoked. Lin Zhijian was involved in copyright issues for plagiarism, which were also filed in civil infringement and criminal proceedings.

Lin Zhijian, who once served as a member of the Hsinchu City Council and the mayor of Hsinchu City is regarded as the future star of the youth of the Democratic Progressive Party. The controversy, which violates academic ethics, hurts Lin's Democratic Progressive Party in the 2022 Taiwanese local elections.

Background[edit]

Lin Zhijian, a member of the Democratic Progressive Party, went to the Department of Science and Technology Management to study[2] for a master's degree when he was an assistant to Ker Chien-ming, a legislative member of the same party. His master's degree thesis, "Evaluation of the Satisfaction of Residents around a Science Park in China in TCSI Mode," was written by [3] under the guidance of He Lixing,[3] and the oral was completed in July 2008.[2] In addition, in April 2008, He Lixing, Lin Zhijian, and Wang Minglang (one of the oral committee members) jointly signed up for the "Academic Seminar on Management Strategy and Economic Development." They jointly published the article "Evaluation of public satisfaction in Hsinchu Science Industrial Park by TCSI Mode.[2]"

Later, after Lin Zhijian's 2013 tenure at the National Taiwan University National Development Initiatives Institute, he was elected mayor of Hsinchu City Council after Professor Chen Ming-tong,[4] under the guidance of, wrote a master's thesis on the leverage of the political and social foundation and its influence: in the 2014 Hsinchu mayor election as an example,[5] in the January 2017 oral test through.[6]

After mid-2022, when Lin Zhijian announced his candidacy for mayor of Taoyuan, Wang Hongwei, a kuomintang, held a press conference to accuse Lin of plagiarism in his dissertation. Plagiarism is regarded as an election issue, and the comments of all parties are mainly influenced by the positions of political parties.[7]

Chung Hua University paper[edit]

Put forward a report[edit]

During Lin Zhijian's participation in the results of the 2018 Taiwanese magistrate, some netizens discussed his master's degree from Zhonghua University, but it did not arouse many echoes.[8] During the 2020 Taiwanese presidential election, Hsu Yung-ming, the Legislative Yuan of the New Power Party, once accused Lin Zhijian of plagiarism for his master's thesis at China University. However, Lin Zhijian and his guidance professor, He Lixing, had already clarified and denied it.[8] However, the power of The Times refuted Lin Zhijian's statement, indicating that the press conference in July 2020 accused the legislator Cheng Chen-chien of copying his thesis and did not mention Lin Zhijian.[9]

On July 5, 2022, Taipei City Councilor Wang Hongwei, a member of the Kuomintang, held a press conference to accuse Lin Zhijian of plagiarism in his master's thesis at Chung Hua University[10][11] She accused Lin Zhijian of copying the 2007 Hsinchu Science Park commissioned Chung Hua University to handle the research bidding case "evaluating the public satisfaction of Hsinchu Science Park in TCSI mode" final report "evaluating the surrounding resident satisfaction of Hsinchu Science Industrial Park in TCSI mode" (signed by Li Youzheng and Wang Minglang).[12] Wang Hongwei hoped that Chung Hua University would properly investigate and suggested that Lin Zhijian volunteer to "return" his degree. On July 6, Wang Hongwei and Taoyuan City Council candidate Ling Tao jointly held a press conference to announce that Lin Zhijian's paper from Zhonghua University was suspected of copying the text of Quality Monthly in December 2005, and the text similarity reached 94.1%.

Wang Hongwei publicly announced it again on July 28. She received a whistle-blower complaint showing that at an international symposium held in Beijing in October 2008, Wang Minglang and two other graduate students, surnamed Wang and surnamed Zhong, published an English paper titled "Applying the TCSI model to evaluate the stakeholder's satisfaction nearby Hsinchu Science Industrial Park (Chinese Translation: Using the TCSI model to evaluate the satisfaction of interested people near Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park)." Lin Zhijian and his thesis guidance professor, He Lixing, were not named in it. After comparison, the paper published in Beijing is the same as that published by Lin Zhijian, Wang Minglang, and He Lixing in the China University seminar, but the paper is "English," the chart content of the paper is the same in the same order, and all the conclusions and figures are entirely the same.

Lin Zhijian responded[edit]

Lin Zhijian responded that he participated in the bamboo science-commissioned research and also published a seminar paper with the same name as He Lixing and Wang Minglang.[12][13] [17] He thinks his behavior is not plagiarism, and He Lixing and Wang Minglang also issued a written statement to endorse him,[13][14][15] Wang Hongwei in the Chung Hua university to bamboo administration plan application; according to the plan application, architecture planning is responsible by Wang Mingming, investigation and analysis is by Wang Mingming and He Lixing is responsible for the report by Wang Mingming and Li Youzhi is responsible for writing, Lin Zhijian is an unpaid research assistant and is responsible for "assist in the investigation," so Wang Hongwei says that Lin Zhijian "just help send questionnaire" rather than the original, and points out that the bamboo final report cover host is "Dr. Li Youzhi, Dr. Wang Minglang," no Lin Zhijian.[16]

On July 24, Lin Zhijian and lawmaker Cheng Yun-peng held a press conference, expressing in chronological order that his copyright ownership of the master's degree at the Discipline Management Institute of China is also his research process.

In addition, On July 6, Lin Zhijian appointed a lawyer to the Hsinchu District Prosecutor's Office to accuse the prosecutor Wang Hongwei of criminal law. After he was transferred to the jurisdiction of the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office, the North Prosecutor punished him.[17] Wang Hongwei is fighting against Lin Zhijian, who was falsely accused; the north inspection is still under investigation.[17]

Academic review and results[edit]

In the examination and approval process, Lin Zhijian once attended an explanation.[18]

On August 24, Chung Hua University announced the results of the review, confirming that Lin Zhijian's plagiarism was a serious violation of academic ethics, revoked Lin Zhijian's master's degree, and also sent a letter to the National Library to remove Lin Zhijian's paper from the shelves.[19][20] According to the statement, He Lixing, the guiding professor of Lin Zhijian's thesis, and Li Youzhi, the member of the oral examination, are the co-host and the host of the plan, respectively, but do not investigate the final report of his master's thesis and the plan, which is obviously negligent, and will be sent to the teaching evaluation committee for review.[21][22]

In early October, Lin filed a lawsuit with the Ministry of Education over the administrative action of Chung Hua University to revoke his degree.[31] After the trial of the lawsuit review committee, the Ministry of Education rejected the lawsuit filed by Lin Zhijian with the decision on January 19, 2023, of Taiwan Education Law (3) No. 1110094222, believing that Chung Hua University was punished in accordance with the regulations and the cancellation of Lin Zhijian's master's degree was not wrong.[23] Lin Zhijian also apologized on his personal Facebook fan page on February 14, 2023, for revoking the punishment of Zhonghua University, respecting the resolution of the Litigation Review Committee of the Ministry of Education, and not filing an administrative lawsuit.[24][25]

Copyright problem[edit]

Ling Tao and Yang Zhi-dou, a KMT Taipei city councilor candidate, went to the Taipei District People's Office on July 6 to accuse Lin Zhijian of violating the Copyright Law.[26] Wang also accused the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office of Lin, his professors, and others of violating the copyright law.[27]

According to the contract between the Hsinchu Science Park Administration and Chung Hua University, the property rights of the works in the closing report belong to the Bamboo Science Administration. In a statement, the bureau, on the evening of July 6, asked Chung Hua University to make an explanation.[28] The administration has also publicly stated that no one has applied for authorization to use the closing report.[29] Bamboo Science Administration Bureau and Zhonghua University have exchanged many official letters and discussions.[30] On December 30, 2022, the bureau filed a civil lawsuit against Lin Zhijian for violation of the Copyright Law and filed a criminal complaint to the Hsinchu Local Procuratorate in Taiwan on January 3, 2023.[31]

National Taiwan University thesis[edit]

Put forward a report[edit]

On July 5, media practitioners Huang Yangming, Taiwan University, Institute of National Development Professor Du Zhenhua, and Lin Zhitsu in the National Development Institute presented a master's thesis on the three campaigns of leveraged political and social foundation and its influence in 2014, Hsinchu mayor election, for example, was suspected of copying another national development institute graduate student Yu Zhenghuang master'she tsis.[32][33][34] The next day, Xu Xiaoxin sent an official letter to the National Taiwan University, stating that Lin Zhijian's paper was suspected of copying Yu Zhenghuang's paper.[35]

Response and rebuttal[edit]

Lin Zhijian and his guidance professor, Chen Ming-tong, offered some responses, arguing that Lin Zhijian's paper was original and did not copy Yu Zhenghuang's paper.

Data Use[edit]

Chen Ming-tong, Lin's guidance professor, mentioned on July 5 that the poll data used by Yu Zhenghuang's dissertation resulted from an internal poll of Lin Zhijian's campaign office. After Lin's approval, Chen provided it to Yu as research material.[36][48] Yu Zhenghuang's acknowledgements in the paper also mention that Lin Zhijian provided his research data.[37][38] Chen Mingtong believes that "Lin Zhijian and Yu Zhenghuang did not copy" because Lin Yu's paper was based on the data collected by the same election and the same questionnaire; the outside world questioned that the part with similar words and grammar is "operational definition." Of course, it would be the same.[39]

Complete the timing[edit]

The informant argued that Yu Zhenghuang conducted the oral examination of the paper earlier than Lin Zhijian, so from the time sequence, Yu Zhenghuang finished the paper earlier. In addition, Lin Zhijian's master's thesis cites Yu Zhenghuang's master's thesis as reference material.

Lin Zhijian said that his paper was written before Yu Zhenghuang and proposed (1) sending professor Chen Mingtong to Lin Zhijian and Secretary Yang Lingyan on February 1, 2016, and (2) having Yu Zhenghuang complete the research plan on March 8 as evidence.[40][41] Lin Zhijian's Taiwan University master's thesis guidance professor Chen Mingtong also said that Yu Zhenghuang originally wrote an unsatisfactory master's thesis plan and wanted to change the topic, so he contacted him.[36] After obtaining Lin Zhijian's consent, Chen Mingtong provided the first draft of Lin Zhijian's paper as a demonstration and suggestion to Yu for reference. However, he must still inform Yu Zhenghuang that it was Lin Zhijian's first draft.[42] Both papers are similar (such as a typo); both first appeared in Lin Zhijian's research plan on February 1.[42]

Yu responded that he had not read Lin Zhijian's paper when the incident broke out in 2022.[43]

else

Lin's lawyer said on July 28 that Lin's paper was original and neither side was copied because Chen's teaching and guidance in writing the paper were similar. Yu Zhenghuang's lawyer told Lin Zhijian that he was original and said Lin Zhijian's view was politically original and academic, which is plagiarism.[44]

Lin Zhijian's lawyer also argued that because the research is reasonable, Lin Zhijian's paper is original. Lin Zhijian took the poll data of "abandoning protection" Cai Renjian as the research item to prove the phenomenon of three changes; Yu Zhenghuang did not set the change, but there is still a paragraph. Moreover, Lin Zhijian assumes voters will support CAI Renjian because of his high education. However, Yu Zhenghuang, who uses the same data, believes that voters will support Lin Zhijian. However, Lin Zhijian needs to be more highly educated, and Yu Zhenghuang's research logic needs to be revised. Yu Zhenghuang's lawyer responded that Yu's paper writing time needed longer and was inevitably flawed.[44]

Lin's lawyer also argued that both Lin and Yu's master theses mentioned "we ask further" in the poll, and the poll data came from Lin's campaign; using the first person was reasonable, but Yu used other people's information, using "we" was strange. Yu Zhenghuang's lawyer responded that Yu's paper writing time needed longer and was inevitably flawed.[44]

In the wording part, Yu Zhenghuang's appointed lawyer also mentioned that Lin and Yu mistakenly wrote Xu Mingcai's degree "Dominken University" as "Dominican University," and both wrote that Lin Zhijian was a "prospective master." You can clearly say that the reason for the wrong marking of education was to directly quote the incorrect information on the official website of the Kuomintang and to call Lin Zhijian a "prospective master" because he did not know that Lin Zhijian had a master's degree from Chung Hua University. Lawyers questioned that if Lin had completed his thesis, he should not call himself a prospective master.[45] The lawyer also said Lin and Yu had the same paragraph of the paper, while Yu Zhenghuang had cited references, but Lin Zhijian did not. Lin Zhijian copied other researchers for this paragraph, if not Yu Zhenghuang.[46][47]

Academic Review and Results[edit]

Taiwan University announced on July 6 that it had received the complaint and would complete it[48] within two months. The school received a report containing Lin Zhijian copying Yu Zhenghuang, Yu Zhenghuang copying Lin Zhijian, and two people copying each other three; according to the school rules, the Academy of Social Sciences approved the report on the July 17 approval committee, the dean of the Academy of Social Sciences Su Hongda convener, based on the information provided to the committee of the information, and the accused to the committee replied data approval (but not including the parties not submitted to the committee, data published in other places).[49]

After starting the investigation, Su Hongda mentioned that the academic dishonesty was a "scandal"[50] in an email [51] to the hospital. Lin Zhijian believed Su Hongda was "judged before trial" and applied to order Su Hongda to avoid review.[52] However, the committee rejected Lin Zhijian's application [53] at a meeting on the 27th.

Taiwan University compared their papers through the comparison software, and the results were more than 40% similar. After the discussion, the substantive review was taken paragraph by paragraph, and the related people were invited to attend the meeting for an explanation. The committee invited Lin Zhijian (3 times), guidance professor Chen Mingtong (3 times), and Yu Zhenghuang (2 times) to explain that the first two were not present, and Yu Zhenghuang only went to the meeting once.[49] Lin Zhijian said that he thought the convener, Su Hongda, was biased against him, so he only submitted a written statement and refused to attend [52]

After comparison by the committee, the plagiarism was confirmed. However, because the two papers were highly similar and not correctly quoted, according to academic practice, the publisher, Lin Zhijian (January 2017), copied the first publisher, Yu Zhenghuang (July 2016).[49] On August 9, National Taiwan University held a press conference after carefully comparing the two papers, chapter by chapter, paragraph by section, and section by section, in addition to finding the same or similar. Yu Zhenghuang proposed the draft of the "January 28, 2016 version." It was confirmed that Yu Zhenghuang had no plagiarism, but Lin Zhijian copied the master's thesis, and the circumstances are severe enough to suggest cancelling the degree. The Academic Affairs Office agreed to review the report and revoke Lin Zhijian's master's degree.[54][55] On the same day, Taiwan University sent a letter to the National Library of China, informing Lin that Zhijian's degree had been revoked and requesting the removal of his paper and electronic papers under Article 17 of the Degree Awarding Law of the Ministry of Education and point 11 of the violation of doctoral and master's degrees.[56][57]

Lin Zhijian himself refused to recognize the approval results of Taiwan University;[58] on September 6, against the punishment of Taiwan University for revoking his degree, he filed a lawsuit against the Ministry of Education.[59] However, Lin Zhijian posted on Facebook on February 14, 2023, that he withdrew the petition, and the Ministry of Education also closed the case by law.[24][25][26]

In addition, after Taiwan University decided to revoke his degree, Qian Yijun publicly alleged that two assistants wrote Lin Zhijian's thesis. However, Taiwan University responded that since the accused's degree had been revoked, the examination target no longer existed and would not be examined again.[60][61]

Questions for directing the professor[edit]

Following the accusation of Lin Zhijian, Wang Hongwei reported to the Ministry of Education and Taiwan University on August 1, which was also suspected of violating academic ethics. On August 9, when Taiwan University announced the results of the academic ethics review, it also indicated that Chen Ming Tong, as the guiding professor, "should be clear and remind the relevant academic norms", which is suspected of dereliction of duty. The school receives the report and will form a review committee to investigate and approve it.[62] Chen Ming, then head of the National Security Bureau (Taiwan), told a friend that if Taiwan University launched an investigation against him, he would thoroughly explain it.[63]

Chen Mingtong has not applied for the National Development Institute since the 111th academic year (August 2022).[64] In his teaching career (1995–2022), he has guided at least 173 master's and doctoral students to write their dissertations,[65] including Lin Zhijian, Zheng Wencan, Pan Meng'a Gao Jiayu, Guo Guowen, Qiu Zhiwei, Shen Anhui, and other dignitaries.[66] Of the 173 students, only five were in public electronic full text and were questioned by management scholar Lai Shibao about whether they were afraid of being tested.[65]

On August 10, Chung Xiaoping, a Taipei city councillor, went to the Control Yuan to report Chen, saying that Chen forced Yu to take responsibility for the paper and even met with Yu. His accusations include Chen Mingdong reversing the wrong and telling Lin Zhijian that he had taken the data to Yu Zhenghuang, but Taiwan University proved Lin plagiarised. Chen Mingtong has five student thesis topics. The study of Hong Kong changes, subjectivity, structure, and conclusion are the same; Chen Mingtong is a topic for five students. He suggested that Chen publish 170 papers guiding students and put the content in the National Library of China.[67]

Copyright problem[edit]

Yu Zhenghuang, an investigation officer of the Hsinchu Investigation Station of the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau, faced a faced a private prosecution on September 29, accusing Lin Zhijian of violating the Copyright Law.[68] After the mediation arranged by the Taiwan Taipei District Court, they settled on June 10, 2023. As long as Lin Zhijian donated 300,000 yuan to public welfare groups, Yu agreed to withdraw the private lawsuit under the Copyright Law and told the Taipei Local Procuratorate's Office.[69] Because Yu Zhenghuang told the Taipei District Prosecutors' Office, Lin Zhijian was also told not to prosecute.[70]

Influence[edit]

Academic ethics norms have been tightened.Academic ethics norms have been tightened[edit]

National Taiwan University announced on July 6, 2022, that from that day, all master and doctoral students must use the original comparison of text similarity before leaving the.[71]

Impact of the election situation[edit]

In mid-2022, Lin Zhijian announced that he would represent the Democratic Progressive Party in the Taoyuan mayoral election.[72] His paper was publicly accused of plagiarism by many people, and the first whistleblower, Wang Hongwei, from the KMT, became a hot topic in the election campaign after Lin Zhijian announced his candidacy.[7]。For example, the KMT suggested that Chen Ming-tong, president of GuoGuoan and party chairman, apologize for criticizing Lin for violating academic ethics and losing personal integrity.[73][74]

In the Democratic Progressive Party, Gao Jiayu, a member of the party, said that the dispute between Lin Zhijian's paper and the Hsinchu Stadium would have a negative impact on the northern candidates in the 2022 Taiwanese local elections, so some people suggested replacing Lin Zhijian.[75] Zheng Yunpeng, a party official elected by Lin Zhijian in Taoyuan and another member of parliament, opposed Gao's views and accused her of "apparently not reading the complete information and not understanding her party members.[76]"

On August 10, the next day after the cancellation of his degree by Taiwan University, Tsai Ing-wen, chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party, said at a party meeting that "we are willing to believe that Zhijian did not copy" and instructed party members to believe Lin Zhijian. "We will shout to everyone that Lin Zhijian did not copy.[77]" However, on August 12, after the DPP held a temporary election response meeting, Lin Zhijian said in a press conference that he would voluntarily withdraw from the election, with his assistant cadre Zheng Yunpeng taking over to participate in the Taoyuan mayoral election.[78]

In the 2022 Taiwanese local elections, the Democratic Progressive Party was greatly defeated. The post-election official review report submitted by the DPP pointed out that after the outbreak of Lin Zhijian's paper plagiarism incident, the failure to timely and properly handle it caused public dissatisfaction. The hasty withdrawal from the election affected the trust of young people, and the whole incident had a negative impact on the election situation.[79]

explanatory note[edit]

  1. ↑ This term was reported in the Freedom Times on January 11, 2023. The title and text of Chen Ming Tong and Lin Zhijian's paper plagiarism case are determined to be unjust.[1]

2. Yu Zhenghuang's master's thesis is entitled "Research on the Election of Hsinchu Mayor in 2014: An Analysis of the Political and Social Foundation of Lin Zhijian". The guiding professor is Li Bihan, and one of the oral committee members is Chen Mingtong (guiding Professor Lin Zhijian).[80]

3. Then the head of the National Security Bureau (Taiwan). The NNSA coordinated the institutions of the Republic of China, so Chen Mingtong was the head of investigator Yu Zhenghuang.[81][82]

References[edit]

  1. ↑ 自由時報電子報 (2023-01-11). "陳明通︰林智堅論文抄襲案 確定是冤案 - 政治 - 自由時報電子報" [Chen Mingtong: Lin Zhijian’s paper plagiarism case is definitely an unjust case]. news.ltn.com.tw (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-02.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 NOWnews, 今日新聞 (2022-07-05). "論文遭爆抄襲！林智堅：已是舊聞 絕對禁得起考驗 | 政治快訊 | 要聞" [The paper was plagiarized! Lin Zhijian: It’s old news and will definitely stand the test]. NOWnews今日新聞 (in 中文). Retrieved 2023-07-31.
  3. ↑ Zhang, Yuzhen (2022-07-31). "獨／學位量販店？林智堅老師 賀力行1人指導473本論文 | 林智堅論文爭議 | 要聞 | 聯合新聞網" [Controversy over Lin Zhijian's paper]. web.archive.org (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-02.
  4. ↑ Zheng, Xiuling. "民報 Taiwan People News | 【專欄】大家來比對林智堅兩碩士論文" [Let’s compare Lin Zhijian’s two master’s theses]. www.peoplenews.tw (in 中文). Retrieved 2022-07-22.
  5. ↑ 自由時報電子報 (2022-07-05). "台大碩論引用余正煌論文？林智堅︰我才是原創者 - 政治 - 自由時報電子報" [Lin Zhijian: I am the original author]. news.ltn.com.tw (in 中文). Retrieved 2022-07-05.
  6. ↑ NOWnews今日新聞 (2022-07-24). "影／親上火線回應！林智堅：3個在先 論文原創、無抄襲 | 政治快訊 | 要聞" [Lin Zhijian: 3 first, original paper, no plagiarism]. NOWnews今日新聞 (in 中文). Retrieved 2023-03-15.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Cai, Huizhen. "林智堅論文門綠基層兩樣情！桃市長選情老神在在 北市憂外溢效應「剉咧等」 -- 上報 / 要聞" [Lin Zhijian's thesis "Two Kinds of Love at the Grassroots Level]. www.upmedia.mg. Retrieved 2024-05-02.
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 "王骏杰; 巫鸿玮. 早被指控過 林：受師指導討論" [Wang Junjie; Wu Hongwei. They have been accused before. Lin: Discuss under the guidance of a teacher.].
  9. ↑ "吴亮贤. 時力：林應據實說明 別模糊焦點" [Wu Liangxian. Shi Li: Lin should explain truthfully and not blur the focus.] (in 中文).
  10. ↑ "論文涉嫌抄襲風波再起！林智堅冷回2字" [The controversy over suspected plagiarism in papers has arisen again!] (in 中文). Retrieved 2022-07-06.
  11. ↑ "林智堅論文抄襲風波延燒　中華大學：收到檢舉就調查" [Lin Zhijian's paper plagiarism controversy spreads. Chung Hwa University: Investigate upon receipt of reports] (in 中文). Retrieved 2022-07-05.
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 "李光仪. 師生變文 不只林該交代" [Li Guangyi. It is not only Lin who should explain the story between teachers and students.] (in 中文). Retrieved 2022-07-05.
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 "她臉書貼王明郎教授聲明：林智堅研究合理" [She posted a statement from Professor Wang Minglang on Facebook: Lin Zhijian’s research is reasonable] (in 中文). Retrieved 2022-07-05.
  14. ↑ "被控論文涉抄襲　林智堅急滅火：藍營炮製「林智堅版宇昌案」 我才是原創者！" [Accused of plagiarism, Lin Zhijian urgently puts out the fire: Lanying concocted "Lin Zhijian's version of the Yuchang case" and I am the original author!] (in 中文).
  15. ↑ 中央通訊社 (2022-07-05). "林智堅遭指論文涉抄襲 中午記者會說明【直播】 | 政治" [Lin Zhijian was accused of plagiarism in his paper and explained at the noon press conference]. 中央社 CNA (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-04.
  16. ↑ "公開竹科研究計劃書「人力分工表」　王鴻薇：林智堅只是幫忙發問卷" [Publication of Bamboo Research Plan "Manpower Division Table" Wang Hongwei: Lin Zhijian just helped distribute the questionnaire] (in 中文).
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 Qian, LiZhong. "王鴻薇指林智堅碩論抄襲 挨告加重誹謗不起訴" [Wang Hongwei accused Lin Zhijian of plagiarism and was sued for aggravated defamation but not prosecuted]. Retrieved 2023-02-06.
  18. ↑ "林智堅今赴中華大學說明論文「沒抄襲」 對審定會詢問對答順暢 | 2022九合一選舉". web.archive.org. 2022-08-22. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  19. ↑ "林智堅論文案 中華大學認定抄襲撤銷碩士學位" [Lin Zhijian's dissertation, Chung Hwa University revoked master's degree after finding plagiarism]. Retrieved 2022-08-24.
  20. ↑ "林智堅論文案提訴願被駁回 審議委員：研究基礎能力不足" [Lin Zhijian's petition for filing a paper was rejected. Review committee member: Insufficient basic research capabilities]. Retrieved 2023-02-03.
  21. ↑ "林智堅碩士學位又沒了！中華大學也認定抄襲　校長發3點聲明籲記取教訓" [Lin Zhijian’s master’s degree is gone again! Chung Hua University also identified plagiarism. The president issued a 3-point statement urging lessons to be learned.] (in 中文). Retrieved 2022-08-25.
  22. ↑ 中央通訊社 (2022-08-24). "中華大學認定林智堅論文抄襲 指導教授賀力行與口委李友錚送教評會 | 政治" [Chung Hwa University finds Lin Zhijian's paper plagiarized]. 中央社 CNA (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-04.
  23. ↑ 聯合新聞網. "林智堅學位被撤首場訴願遭駁回 教部提一點可再拚翻盤" [Lin Zhijian's first appeal against having his degree revoked was rejected. The Ministry of Education can make a comeback with some suggestions]. 聯合新聞網 (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-04.
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 聯合新聞網. "道歉了！林智堅撤回台大學位訴願案 教育部證實「結案」" [Apologized! Lin Zhijian withdraws appeal for National Taiwan University degree]. 聯合新聞網 (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-04.
  25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 Wang, BoWen. "放棄戰清白！林智堅道歉「論文寫作有瑕疵」：撤回台大學位訴願" [Give up the fight for innocence! Lin Zhijian apologizes for "flaws in thesis writing": appeals to withdraw his degree from National Taiwan University].
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 "林智堅論文再爆抄月刊 藍告違著作權法" [Lin Zhijian's article was plagiarized from a monthly magazine again, and he was accused of violating copyright law]. Yahoo News (in 中文). 2022-07-06. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
  27. ↑ 自由時報電子報 (2022-07-07). "王鴻薇挨告加重誹謗 今告發林智堅違反著作權、剽竊國家財產 - 政治 - 自由時報電子報" [Wang Hongwei was sued for aggravated defamation and now accused Lin Zhijian of violating copyright and plagiarizing state property.]. news.ltn.com.tw (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-04.
  28. ↑ "快訊／林智堅論文與竹科報告雷同涉侵權 竹科管理局：將請中華大學說明 | ETtoday政治新聞 | ETtoday新聞雲" [Lin Zhijian's paper is similar to Zhu Ke's report, involving infringement]. www.ettoday.net (in 中文). 2022-07-06. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
  29. ↑ "竹科管理局公文曝光！證實林智堅論文使用資料沒有申請授權" [Official documents from the Bamboo Management Bureau exposed! Confirmed that Lin Zhijian did not apply for authorization to use the materials in his thesis]. Yahoo News (in 中文). 2022-07-21. Retrieved 2024-05-04.
  30. ↑ "林智堅中華大學碩論抄襲涉侵權　科管局：將釐清合約內容" [Lin Zhijian's master's degree thesis of China University was plagiarized and involved in infringement. The Science and Technology Administration: Will clarify the content of the contract]. Retrieved 2022-08-25.
  31. ↑ Lin, ZhiCheng. "竹科管理局告林智堅侵權 國科會回應了" [Bamboo Management Bureau sues Lin Zhijian for infringement, National Science Council responds]. Retrieved 2023-02-05.
  32. ↑ "林智堅論文涉抄襲再添一樁！　媒體人加碼爆料：台大國發所碩士論文也涉抄襲 | 《菱傳媒》RWNews" [Media people have stepped up their revelations: National Taiwan University’s National Institute of Development Master’s thesis was also involved in plagiarism.]. web.archive.org. 2022-07-07. Retrieved 2024-05-05.
  33. ↑ "他一看傻眼！揪林智堅碩論涉抄襲證據 竟「8、9頁大規模雷同」 | ETtoday政治新聞 | ETtoday新聞雲" [He was dumbfounded when he saw it! The evidence of plagiarism involved in Lin Zhijianshuo's discussion turned out to be "massive similarity in 8 or 9 pages"]. www.ettoday.net (in 中文). 2022-07-05. Retrieved 2022-07-05.
  34. ↑ "林智堅國發所論文也涉抄襲 台大：目前未收到檢舉 | 林智堅論文爭議 | 要聞 | 聯合新聞網" [Lin Zhijian's National Development Research Institute paper also involved plagiarism. National Taiwan University: No reports have been received so far.]. web.archive.org. 2022-07-07. Retrieved 2024-05-05.
  35. ↑ 徐文鴻 (2022-07-06). "徐巧芯檢舉林智堅論文涉抄襲 台大聲明「審定」時程也出爐了" [Xu Qiaoxin reported that Lin Zhijian's paper was plagiarized. The "review" timetable of National Taiwan University's statement has also been released.]. 鏡週刊 Mirror Media (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-05.
  36. ↑ 36.0 36.1 "峰迴路轉！指導教授陳明通澄清　是別人拿林智堅資料寫博士論文" [Supervisor Professor Chen Mingtong clarified that someone else used Lin Zhijian’s information to write his doctoral thesis.] (in 中文).
  37. ↑ "林智堅論文抄襲爭議延燒 余正煌論文誌謝曝光：感謝林市長提供資料協助 | 政治" [Controversy over plagiarism of Lin Zhijian's thesis spreads. Yu Zhenghuang's thesis acknowledgment is exposed: Thank you to Mayor Lin for providing information and assistance]. Newtalk新聞 (in 中文). 2022-07-05. Retrieved 2023-05-01.
  38. ↑ Guo, Xuanyan (2022-07-05). "余正煌論文誌謝 林智堅：證明我是第一手資料 | 政治" [Yu Zhenghuang's thesis thanks Lin Zhijian: Prove that I have first-hand information]. 中央社 CNA (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-05.
  39. ↑ Storm.mg (2022-07-23). "重申林智堅論文沒抄襲！陳明通發「4000字長文」逐條駁斥外界質疑-風傳媒" [I reiterate that Lin Zhijian’s paper was not plagiarized! Chen Mingtong published a "4,000-word long article"]. www.storm.mg (in 中文).
  40. ↑ "直播／林智堅：論文我是原創、絕無抄襲 律師點名蘇宏達自請迴避 | 林智堅論文爭議 | 要聞 | 聯合新聞網" [Live broadcast/Lin Zhijian: My paper is original and there is no plagiarism.]. web.archive.org. 2022-07-30.
  41. ↑ "媒體人點出本報一張照片 揭露林智堅論文門關鍵證據 | 林智堅論文爭議 | 要聞 | 聯合新聞網" [Revealing key evidence of Lin Zhijian’s thesis]. web.archive.org. 2023-06-22.
  42. ↑ 42.0 42.1 "快訊／陳明通最新2000字聲明：先修正林智堅論文 後給余正煌參考 | ETtoday政治新聞 | ETtoday新聞雲" [Chen Mingtong’s latest 2000-word statement: First revise Lin Zhijian’s paper and then give it to Yu Zhenghuang for reference]. www.ettoday.net (in 中文). 2022-07-31.
  43. ↑ "余正煌：到現在沒看過林智堅論文 也懶得看 | 林智堅論文爭議 | 要聞 | 聯合新聞網". web.archive.org. 2022-08-06. Retrieved 2024-05-05.
  44. ↑ 44.0 44.1 44.2 Du, Guanlin (2022-07-28). "快訊／林智堅堅持論文「原創」 余正煌律師：政治上是、學術上絕不是 | ETtoday政治新聞 | ETtoday新聞雲" [Lin Zhijian insists that the paper is "original" Lawyer Yu Zhenghuang: Politically yes, academically no]. www.ettoday.net (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-05.
  45. ↑ "余正煌律師證明「他」自己寫論文：這個不是打錯 是國民黨網站寫錯 | 政治". Newtalk新聞 (in 中文). 2022-07-28. Retrieved 2024-05-05.
  46. ↑ "「真金不怕火煉！」余正煌律師：「林智堅論文沒有引註就是抄襲」" [Lawyer Yu Zhenghuang: "Lin Zhijian's paper without citations is plagiarism."]. web.archive.org. 2022-08-03. Retrieved 2021-05-09.
  47. ↑ "【快訊】余正煌再反擊林智堅！ 律師嗆「余的論文有引述出處，林的沒有，這就是抄襲！」 -- 上報 / 焦點". www.upmedia.mg. Retrieved 2024-05-05.
  48. ↑ "林智堅論文抄襲案 台大：已接獲檢舉 將進入處理程序 - 生活 - 中時". web.archive.org. 2022-07-06. Retrieved 2024-05-05.
  49. ↑ 49.0 49.1 49.2 "林智堅不認論文有抄襲 台大打臉點名3大錯 - 工商時報". web.archive.org. 2022-08-09. Retrieved 2024-05-05.
  50. ↑ 自由時報電子報 (2022-07-25). "蘇宏達指論文案是醜聞 林智堅：遺憾難接受、未審先判 - 政治 - 自由時報電子報" [Su Hongda pointed out that the case was a scandal. Lin Zhijian: Regret is hard to accept.]. news.ltn.com.tw (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  51. ↑ Xu, Zhanyi (2022-07-25). "蘇宏達審林智堅遭批「未審先判、立場偏頗」 台大6字回應了 | ETtoday生活新聞 | ETtoday新聞雲". www.ettoday.net (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  52. ↑ 52.0 52.1 "蘇宏達迴避案 台大審委一致駁回 | 林智堅論文爭議 | 要聞 | 聯合新聞網". web.archive.org. 2022-08-03. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  53. ↑ "林智堅拒出席倫理審定會卻發千字文　台大回應了｜蘋果新聞網｜蘋果日報". web.archive.org. 2022-08-08. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  54. ↑ 自由時報電子報 (2022-08-09). "台大學倫案結果出爐！撤銷林智堅碩士學位 - 政治 - 自由時報電子報". news.ltn.com.tw (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  55. ↑ "快訊／台大認定抄襲建議撤銷學位 林智堅回應：不理解實質內容 | ETtoday政治新聞 | ETtoday新聞雲". www.ettoday.net (in 中文). 2022-08-09. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  56. ↑ 自由時報電子報 (2022-08-09). "台大認定林智堅抄襲 國圖下架論文 - 生活 - 自由時報電子報". news.ltn.com.tw (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  57. ↑ "查不到了！林智堅台大論文遭認定抄襲 國家圖書館火速下架 | 林智堅論文爭議 | 要聞 | 聯合新聞網". web.archive.org. 2022-08-26. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  58. ↑ "林智堅不承認台大審定結果 「論文品質或許不好但絕無抄襲」 -- 上報 / 焦點" [Lin Zhijian does not recognize the review result of National Taiwan University, "The quality of the paper may not be good, but it is definitely not plagiarized."]. www.upmedia.mg. Retrieved 2022-11-06.
  59. ↑ "林智堅台大碩士學位遭撤銷首提訴願　教育部證實已收到申請". web.archive.org. 2022-09-07. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  60. ↑ "林智堅論文再爆幕後代筆人 台大：學位已撤銷不再審查 | 林智堅論文風暴 | 要聞 | 聯合新聞網" [The ghostwriter behind Lin Zhijian's paper explodes again. National Taiwan University: The degree has been revoked and will no longer be reviewed.]. web.archive.org. 2022-08-27. Retrieved 2022-03-22.
  61. ↑ "林智堅台大論文被爆助理代寫 - 政治要聞 - 中國時報". web.archive.org. 2022-08-27. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  62. ↑ "陳明通慘了！台大：將組審定會查是否違反學術倫理 - 生活 - 中時". web.archive.org. 2022-08-20. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  63. ↑ 自由時報電子報 (2022-08-09). "陳明通：已完整說明論文脈絡 台海動盪之際不該影響國安工作 - 政治 - 自由時報電子報". news.ltn.com.tw (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  64. ↑ "台大切割！陳明通非主動請辭　國發所下學年不續聘｜蘋果新聞網｜蘋果日報". web.archive.org. 2022-08-30. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  65. ↑ 65.0 65.1 "陳明通指導173名碩博士論文「公開電子全文僅5位」 遭疑怕人看？ | 林智堅論文爭議 | 要聞 | 聯合新聞網". web.archive.org. 2022-08-25. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  66. ↑ "後來的他們！十大最被討論的陳明通門生 | 政治 | 要聞 | 聯合新聞網". web.archive.org. 2022-10-02. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  67. ↑ "論文風暴延燒！鍾小平赴監院控陳明通施壓余正煌　明再赴地檢署告發 | 《菱傳媒》RWNews". web.archive.org. 2022-08-10. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  68. ↑ "余正煌明提告林智堅 律師證實了 - 社會 - 中時新聞網". web.archive.org. 2022-10-08. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  69. ↑ 聯合新聞網. "論文抄襲案／林智堅捐30萬做公益 余正煌同意撤告". 聯合新聞網 (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  70. ↑ 中央通訊社 (2023-07-28). "余正煌撤告加重誹謗 林智堅獲不起訴處分 | 社會". 中央社 CNA (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  71. ↑ "林智堅碩論爆抄襲 台大：即起碩博生「原創性比對」後才可離校 | ETtoday生活新聞 | ETtoday新聞雲". www.ettoday.net (in 中文). 2022-07-06. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  72. ↑ 中央通訊社 (2022-04-21). "民眾黨桃園市長初選 提名賴香伶迎戰藍綠人選 | 政治". 中央社 CNA (in 中文). Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  73. ↑ "國民黨：林智堅誠信破產 陳明通應下台 蔡英文要道歉 | 林智堅論文爭議 | 要聞 | 聯合新聞網". web.archive.org. 2023-02-13. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  74. ↑ "台大認定林智堅抄襲 國民黨：蔡英文要同樣負起最大責任 | 政治". Newtalk新聞 (in 中文). 2022-08-09. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  75. ↑ "曝黨內傳換堅！高嘉瑜憂林智堅說不清論文 恐釀「1屍5命」 | 林智堅論文爭議 | 要聞 | 聯合新聞網". web.archive.org. 2022-07-31. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  76. ↑ 自由時報電子報 (2022-07-27). "駁高嘉瑜「換堅說」 鄭運鵬：同黨都不理解 受害誰幫妳？ - 政治 - 自由時報電子報" [Zheng Yunpeng: If your colleagues don’t understand, who will help you if you are harmed?]. news.ltn.com.tw (in 中文). Retrieved 2023-06-06.
  77. ↑ "快訊》蔡英文：我們要一起大聲跟大家說 林智堅沒有抄襲 | 政治" [News: Tsai Ing-wen: We must loudly tell everyone that Lin Zhijian did not plagiarize]. Newtalk新聞 (in 中文). 2022-08-10. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  78. ↑ "林智堅退選桃園成定局！ 擬由鄭運鵬接棒上陣 | 林智堅宣布退選 | 要聞 | 聯合新聞網". web.archive.org. 2022-08-25. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  79. ↑ 陳凱俊 (2022-12-28). "綠營敗選檢討「唯一具名提及」 林智堅道歉：願意承擔責任" [Green camp's review of defeat in election "only named mention" Lin Zhijian apologizes: willing to take responsibility]. 鏡週刊 Mirror Media (in 中文). Retrieved 2021-06-06.
  80. ↑ 陳凱俊 (2022-12-28). "綠營敗選檢討「唯一具名提及」 林智堅道歉：願意承擔責任" [Lin Zhijian apologizes: willing to take responsibility]. 鏡週刊 Mirror Media (in 中文). Retrieved 2022-03-06.
  81. ↑ "「余正煌」是誰？ 媒體人一查發現怪怪的：難怪不敢出來自清 | ETtoday政治新聞 | ETtoday新聞雲" [Who is "Yu Zhenghuang"? When the media people checked, they found something strange: No wonder they didn’t dare to come forward to self-examine.]. www.ettoday.net (in 中文). 2022-07-05. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  82. ↑ "大動作反擊林智堅！鄉民大讚余正煌如荊軻刺秦　「請收下我的膝蓋」｜蘋果新聞網｜蘋果日報" [Big move to counterattack Lin Zhijian!]. web.archive.org. 2022-09-03. Retrieved 2021-05-06.


This article "Lin Zhijian's paper plagiarism case" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Lin Zhijian's paper plagiarism case. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.


Retrieved from "https://en.everybodywiki.com/index.php?title=Lin_Zhijian%27s_paper_plagiarism_case&oldid=4068578"
License CC BY-SA 3.0
Powered by MediaWiki
Powered by Semantic MediaWiki