Lit bro
A lit bro is an archetype of male reader generally characterized by snobbery, misogyny, pretentiousness, and other pompous qualities.[1] Likewise, bro lit refers to the catalog of books which such readers generally consume.[2] The term is often mentioned in discourse about Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace, who is often recommended—both seriously and performatively—to women by lit bros.[3][4]
Definition
Lit bro
In 2026, John Semley, writing for Wired, defined the lit bro as "a sullen male chauvinist drawn to challenging literature by male authors who proudly project an air of literary snobbery," with Wallace often considered a "rockstar" in that regard.[5] In 2015, The Cut ran a piece on "Why Literary Chauvinists Love David Foster Wallace," and Electric Literature published Deirdre Coyle's essay on "Wallace-recommending men." In announcing Infinite Jest's thirty-year republication, Literary Hub stated that "the book has become shorthand for a certain kind of pretentious, performative, male-coded lit bro."[6][7] Wallace himself, in 1993, had stated that his readership was "Yuppies, I guess, and younger intellectuals, whatever."[8]
Semley observed that the history of "literary machismo" was a long one, dating back to Herman Melville in the nineteenth century and Ernest Hemingway and the Beatniks in the twentieth, and named challenging prose style—William Gaddis and Thomas Pynchon—and challenging content—American Psycho and Blood Meridian—as hallmarks of the "litbro catalog."[5]
Bro lit
Musician and writer Michelle Zauner, in writing a new foreword for Infinite Jest, defined lit-bro literature as generally having "A white, male protagonist, isolated and misunderstood, stands at odds with social norms and expectations and either grapples internally to critique them or identifies the source of ideology and seeks violent revenge against it."[5]
CT Jones, writing in Rolling Stone, defined bro lit as books which contain generally unlikeable male protagonists with a lack of self-awareness, as well as "books favored by pretentious artsy college boys."[9]
History
In the 2010s, writer Dana Schwartz created the satirical Twitter account @GuyInYourMFA to represent "the archetypal pretentious literary bro" she often encountered at Brown University: "They leaned, leggy and supine along the stairs and railings of the neo-Brutalist campus library, flicking cigarette ash and staring into the distance with dark eyes over hollow, gorgeous cheekbones."[10]
On February 22, 2025, Federico Perelmuter, writing in the Los Angeles Review of Books, used the term "brodernism" to refer to works defined with words such as avant-garde, maximalist, difficult, epic, and many others, typically written by male writers.[11] The piece went viral and spurred discourse about the alleged difficulty of translated literature.[12]
Discourse about lit bros resumed with the thirty-year republication of Infinite Jest in February 2026. In its foreword, Zauner remarked, "I'm not what you might consider Infinite Jest’s target demographic" and described its audience as "a breed of college-aged men who talk over you, a sect of pedantic, misunderstood young men for whom, over the course of thirty years, Infinite Jest has become a rite of passage."[5]
Around the same time, Semley also drew a connection between the lit bro and the performative male, which he identified as its "latest mutation" which "doesn't even read big books" but rather "just peacocks with them for attention."[5]
References
This article "Lit bro" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Lit bro. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.
- ↑ 007595 (2018-09-21). "Dear Men, Please Stop Assigning Reading To Me". Electric Literature. Retrieved 2026-02-07.
- ↑ Jones, C. T. (2023-10-19). "Bros Are Coming for BookTok. These TikTokers Aren't Having It". Rolling Stone. Retrieved 2026-02-07.
- ↑ "Debunking the myth of the toxic 'Infinite Jest bro'". The Independent. 2026-02-03. Retrieved 2026-02-07.
- ↑ Clark, Jonathan Russell (2015-08-20). "Reclaiming David Foster Wallace from the Lit-Bros". Literary Hub. Retrieved 2026-02-07.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Semley, John. "'Infinite Jest' Is Back. Maybe Litbros Should Be, Too". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2026-02-07.
- ↑ 007595 (2017-04-17). "Men Recommend David Foster Wallace to Me". Electric Literature. Retrieved 2026-02-07.
- ↑ "This Week in Literary History: David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest Was Published". Literary Hub. 2026-02-02. Retrieved 2026-02-07.
- ↑ Rowan, Nic (2019-11-15). "Let us now praise famous lit bros". Washington Examiner. Retrieved 2026-02-07.
- ↑ Jones, C. T. (2023-10-19). "Bros Are Coming for BookTok. These TikTokers Aren't Having It". Rolling Stone. Retrieved 2026-02-07.
- ↑ Schwartz, Dana (2019-11-07). "What I Learned From Pretending to Be a Pretentious Lit Bro for 5 Years". Literary Hub. Retrieved 2026-02-07.
- ↑ "Against High Brodernism". Los Angeles Review of Books. 2025-02-22. Retrieved 2026-02-07.
- ↑ Wells, Alexander (2025-04-07). "In search of "Brodernism": Where is this maximalist cult of difficulty?". The Berliner. Retrieved 2026-02-07.
