You can edit almost every page by Creating an account and confirming your email.

Natural-law argument

From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki


The Natural-law argument for the existence of God states that the observation of governing laws and existing order in the universe indicates the existence of a superior being who enacted these laws.[1] The argument was popularised by Isaac Newton, René Descartes, and Robert Boyle.[2] The argument of natural laws as a basis for God was changed by Christian figures such as Thomas Aquinas, in order to fit biblical scripture and establish a Judeo-Christian teleological law.

Bertrand Russell criticized the argument, arguing that many of the things considered to be laws of nature are, in fact, human conventions.[3] The teleological argument assumes that one can infer the existence of intelligent design merely by examination, and because life is reminiscent of something a human might design, it too must have been designed. However, considering "snowflakes and crystals of certain salts", "[i]n no case do we find intelligence". "There are other ways that order and design can come about" such as by "purely physical forces."[4]

References

  1. "The Natural Law Argument". www.mit.edu.
  2. Harrison, Peter; Roberts, Jon H. (2019). Science without God? rethinking the history of scientific naturalism (First ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198834588. Search this book on
  3. "Bertrand Russell | Why I Am Not a Christian". users.drew.edu.
  4. Cornman, J. W., K. Lehrer, and G. S. Pappas. 1992. Philosophical Problems and Arguments: An Introduction. Hackett Publishing. pp. 245–56.

Template:God arguments


Template:Reli-metaphysics-stub


This article "Natural-law argument" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Natural-law argument. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.