Philip Cross (Wikipedian)
Philip Cross is the pseudonymous username of a Wikipedia editor (or Wikipedian) who has generated controversy and scrutiny due to their extensive editing activities. While the identity of Philip Cross remains unknown, the editor has made a significant number of edits, raising questions[by whom?] about bias and politically motivated editing. The impact of these edits has affected various individuals and organisations, leading to discussions about the influence of editors on Wikipedia's content. The Philip Cross Affair highlights the challenges faced by Wikipedia in maintaining neutrality and accuracy while also demonstrating the collaborative nature of the platform.
Biography
Philip Cross (a pseudonym),[1] as of May 2018, had edited Wikipedia over a span of 14 years and made 133,612 edits on Wikipedia.[2] Sarah Robertson, writing for metro.co.uk in 2018, said she did not know who Philip was in real life.[3] George Galloway offered £1000 for Cross's identity,[4] which he claim to be won.[1] Kremlin-backed media and far-leftists also offered reward for Cross's identity.[5]
Controversy
Tim Hayward via Twitter @Tim_Hayward_ Replying to @jimmy_wales
People are having their lives' work edited out on Wikipedia, supplanted by smears and reports of smears. As one of those affected, I ask you to reconsider your dismissive stance regarding complaints about this editor. Does anyone even know who he is?
9 May 2018[6]
The extent of Cross's editing activities on Wikipedia has raised questions[by whom?][when?] about their motivations and potential biases. Some critics[who?] argue that the edits made by Philip Cross appear to target left-leaning anti-war sites and activists.[2][4] Politicians and journalists, such as George Galloway and Craig Murray,[7] have said that Cross edited articles about them.[4] According to the BBC, one of the reasons Cross became the center of debate in the Wikipedia community is because he engaged with individuals on Twitter who were critical of British foreign policies, referring to them as 'goons.' This interaction fueled a heated debate about his editing activities, as it was seen as a conflict of interest.[1]
Kremlin-backed media and far-leftists have accused Cross of targeting their Wikipedia pages, leading to accusations of a witch hunt against him.[by whom?][5] The motives behind the alleged witch hunt[weasel words] are linked to political and ideological differences, with Russian media outlets and the British left being involved.[5] Anti-war activists and critics of Western foreign policy have accused Cross of bias and hostility.[1]
According to George Galloway, Craig Murray, and Tim Hayward, the controversy surrounding Philip Cross is not limited to the editing itself but extends to the broader implications for left-wing journalists and organisations. George Galloway[1] and Glen Black[8] claimed that Wikipedia is being used as a tool against left-wing journalists, with Cross allegedly targeting their pages and inserting negative viewpoints. In addition, they raised concerns about the reliability and integrity of Wikipedia as a source of information, particularly in politically sensitive contexts.[1] According to the News Knowledia, these allegations have also led to discussions about the influence of editors on shaping narratives and perspectives on Wikipedia.[2] However, the BBC indicated that it is important to note that Wikipedia operates on a collaborative model, allowing users to make edits to improve the accuracy and neutrality of articles.[1] Disagreements and controversies arise when editors are accused of having an agenda or bias that influences the content of articles.[2][4]
See also
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 "BBC World Service - Trending, The Mysterious Wikipedia Editor". BBC. Archived from the original on 2023-05-24. Retrieved 2023-06-04. Unknown parameter
|url-status=ignored (help) - ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 "Phillip Cross: The Mystery Wikipedia Editor Targeting Anti-War Sites". news.knowledia.com. 2021-10-09. Retrieved 2023-06-04.
- ↑ Robertson, Sarah (2018-06-18). "Who is Philip Cross? What we know about the mysterious Wikipedia editor". Metro. Archived from the original on 2023-05-25. Retrieved 2023-06-04. Unknown parameter
|url-status=ignored (help) - ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 "Galloway's war of words with a mystery Wikipedia editor". BBC News. 2018-06-18. Archived from the original on 2023-06-03. Retrieved 2023-06-04. Unknown parameter
|url-status=ignored (help) - ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Benjakob, Omer (27 May 2018). "The Witch Hunt Against a 'pro-Israel' Wikipedia Editor". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 2023-03-20. Retrieved 2023-06-04. Unknown parameter
|url-status=ignored (help) - ↑ Tim Hayward [@Tim_Hayward_] (9 May 2018). "People are having their lives' work edited out on Wikipedia, supplanted by smears and reports of smears. As one of those affected, I ask you to reconsider your dismissive stance regarding complaints about this editor. Does anyone even know who he is?" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- ↑ craig (2018-05-18). "The Philip Cross Affair". Craig Murray. Archived from the original on 2023-05-27. Retrieved 2023-06-04. Unknown parameter
|url-status=ignored (help) - ↑ Black, Glen (2018-05-23). "The Philip Cross scandal: How Wikipedia is being used against left-wing journalists". Canary. Archived from the original on 2023-05-07. Retrieved 2023-06-04. Unknown parameter
|url-status=ignored (help)
This article "Philip Cross (Wikipedian)" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Philip Cross (Wikipedian). Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.
|
This page exists already on Wikipedia. |
