RELIEF Act of 2019

The Resolving Extended Limbo for Immigrant Employees and Families (RELIEF) Act of 2019 (S.2603) is a proposed immigration reform bill introduced by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) in the United States Senate on October 16, 2019. The bill seeks to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to end the immigrant visa backlog.

RELIEF Act

Full title	Resolving Extended Limbo for Immigrant Employees and Families Act of 2019
Acronym	RELIEF Act
Colloquial name(s)	The "green card bill", the "per-country cap bill".
Introduced in	116th United States Congress
Introduced on	October 16, 2019
Sponsored by	Dick Durbin (D-IL)
Number of co-sponsors	6 in the United States Senate.
Effects and codifications
Act(s) affected	Immigration and Nationality Act.
U.S.C. section(s) affected	8 U.S.C. § 1101, 8 U.S.C. § 1151, 8 U.S.C. § 1152, 8 U.S.C. § 1153, 8 U.S.C. § 1154, 8 U.S.C. § 1157, 8 U.S.C. § 1182, 8 U.S.C. § 1184, 8 U.S.C. § 1186, 8 U.S.C. § 1201, 8 U.S.C. § 1255.
Agencies affected	Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Legislative history
Introduced in the Senate as S.2603 by Dick Durbin (D-IL) on October 16, 2019 Committee consideration by: Senate Judiciary Committee

Introduction

The Immigration Act of 1990 established five occupational categories (in the Immigration and Nationalities Act of 1965 only two existed). It provided 140,000 immigrant visas (green cards) annually for employment-based immigration and mandated that foreign nationals of no country shall receive more than 7% of the available visas in each category in any given year, with the exception of excess unused visas. However, this is not the case for the H-1B visa system. As such, Indian nationals that for years have received the majority of H-1B visas, despite receiving about 20% of the annual Employment-based green cards have to wait decades before receiving one. A similar situation holds for immigrants applying for family-based green cards where millions of people, mostly from the Philippines, Mexico, India, and China, have to wait years before receiving a green card. The fundamental cause of the green card backlog is that annual demand for green cards is much higher than ones available annually and not, as some may assume, the per-country caps. It is estimated that currently there are 4.7 million people waiting in the green card backlog, 3.9 million of whom are waiting for a family-based green card and the rest waiting for an employment-based green card.

Provisions

The bill would, after a five-year transition period, remove the per-country caps for employment-based green cards and increase the per-country caps for family-sponsored green cards from 7% to 15%, while increasing the number of total available green cards. Specifically, this bill would do the following.

• Over a five-year transition period, it would phase out the per-country numerical limits on employment-based green cards and increase the per-country limits on family-sponsored green cards from 7% to 15%.
• It would create a pool of new green cards almost equal to the entire number of people in the employment- and family-based backlogs, and would distribute those in a course of five years.
• It would uncap the family-sponsored second preference F-2A category for new spouses and minor children of existing legal permanent residents in the United States, which has a cap of about 88,000 and backlog of about 150,000.
• It would increases the number of green cards for the family-sponsored first preference category from 23,400 to 111,334, essentially reassigning the 88,000 from the F-2A category.
• It would exempt derivatives (spouses and minor children) of primary applicants from numerical limits.
• It would protect “aging out” children who qualify for legal permanent resident status based on a parent’s immigration petition.

Viewpoint of Third Parties

The bill has received the backing of several organizations, including American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA); immigration advocacy groups such as Support Alliance of US Immigrants, United We Dream, United Chinese Americans; and professional organizations such as Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and National Association of Graduate-Professional Students (NAGPS). They note that, unlike other legislation such as the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act, this bill is a win-win since it both makes the immigration system more fair by eliminating or raising the per-country caps, and eliminates the backlog by increasing the number of available green cards. They argue that since immigrants impacted by this policy already have jobs here, no American jobs would be affected. Furthermore, by eliminating the backlog it would allow the United States to retain the international talent that studies in its institutes of higher education.

On the other hand, the bill has received pushback from anti-immigration groups such as U.S. Tech Workers who argue that the bill does not address problems of the H-1B program and will further contribute to the displacement of American workers.

See also

• Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013
• Immigration Act of 1990
• Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965

External links

• Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act
• BELIEVE Act

This article "RELIEF Act of 2019" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:RELIEF Act of 2019. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.

📰 Article(s) of the same category(ies)

• US immigration to the United States
• Ellis Island: The Making of A Master Race in America (2018)
• Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019
• Noble immigration to the United States
• Ellis Island: The Making of A Master Race in America
• American entry into Canada by land
• Countries with the least number of US immigrants per year

---