You can edit almost every page by Creating an account. Otherwise, see the FAQ.

Radial acceleration relation

From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki



Solid line is an analytic fit to the observed RAR. Dashed line is the Newtonian relation.


The radial acceleration relation, or RAR, is a relation between the centripetal acceleration, , of a star orbiting in a disk (or spiral) galaxy, and the gravitational acceleration due to the matter in the galaxy. The existence of such a relation is implied by Mordehai Milgrom's alternate theory of gravity, called "modified Newtonian dynamics," or MOND. Newton's theory of gravity also predicts a relation between the same two quantities, but real galaxies do not respect the Newtonian prediction, and the discrepancy is addressed under the standard cosmological model by postulating additional forces from dark matter. Milgrom's theory does not postulate the existence of dark matter.

Milgrom's prediction has been confirmed by observational studies. Confirmation of the prediction demonstrates that the internal kinematics of spiral galaxies are predictable based on the distribution of the visible mass alone, which adds support to the hypothesis that dark matter does not exist.

The same data that are plotted for the RAR can be plotted in a slightly different manner, yielding the mass discrepancy-accleration relation.[1] The two relations express the same physical dependence.

The prediction and its observational verification[edit]

Newton's theory of gravity predicts a simple relation between the centripetal acceleration, , of a star or gas cloud orbiting in the disk plane of a spiral galaxy, and the gravitational acceleration, . The two quantities are predicted to be equal, i.e. , or

 

 

 

 

(1)

where is the orbital speed at distance from the center and is the gravitational potential. Observed galaxies do not obey Equation (1): the measured greatly exceeds the predicted value at large distances from the galaxy center. Under the standard cosmological model, the discrepancy is explained by postulating the presence of dark matter in and around the disk, in whatever amount and distribution required to augment the total and satisfy Equation (1).

Milgrom's theory[2] does not postulate the existence of dark matter. Instead, Newton's relation between and is assumed to be modified in the low-acceleration regime; that is, in the regime , where is Milgrom's constant, which has a value

 

 

 

 

(2)

The precise form of the relation between and is not specified in Milgrom's theory, except in two limiting cases: (i) large accelerations, where Newton's relation is recovered; (ii) small accelerations, i.e. , where . However, the theory predicts that a "functional" relation exists between the two variables, i.e. that , with the function having the correct limiting forms in the regimes of low and high acceleration.

Milgrom's prediction is testable by measuring the two quantities and at different radii in a large sample of galaxies and plotting one variable against the other. The result is called the radial-accleration relation, or RAR. The observed relation is found to be consistent with zero intrinsic scatter, as predicted.[3][4]

Given the observed RAR, the form of the mathematical relation between and can be inferred, by (for instance) fitting a smooth curve to the trend defined by the measured points. This gives the function . A recent study[3] finds:

 

 

 

 

(3)

This function is plotted in the figure.

Once the function has been determined in this way, Milgrom's theory can be quantitatively extended beyond the low-acceleration regime, to regimes of any acceleration. The theory can then be used to predict (for instance) the full rotation curve, , of any galaxy given its measured matter distribution. The results are striking: in virtually every galaxy yet studied in this way, Milgrom's theory correctly predicts the observed rotation curve.[5] No algorithm capable of doing this has yet been presented under the standard cosmological model. That model simply postulates whatever distribution of dark matter is required to yield the observed rotation curve under Newtonian gravity.

Significance[edit]

That the rotation speeds in spiral galaxies should be predictable from the observed mass distribution alone, without the need to postulate the existence of dark matter, is a successful, novel prediction of Milgrom's MOND theory. Standard-model cosmologists have attempted to accommodate the existence of the RAR in a post-hoc sense by adjusting their computer simulations of galaxy formation. These attempts have had limited success however.[6]

Even if standard-model cosmologists should manage to accommodate the RAR via their simulations, the fact that Milgrom's theory correctly predicts the relation without any adjustment of parameters means that the existence of the RAR provides stronger support for MOND than for the standard cosmological model.[7] For instance, philosopher of science John Worrall writes[8]

when one theory has accounted for a set of facts by parameter-adjustment, while a rival accounts for the same facts directly and without contrivance, then the rival does, but the first does not, derive support from those facts

and Peter Lipton concurs:[9]

When data need to be accommodated, there is a motive to force a theory and auxiliaries to make the accommodation. The scientist knows the answer she must get, and she does whatever it takes to get it. ... In the case of prediction, by contrast, there is no motive for fudging, since the scientist does not know the right answer in advance. ... As a result, if the prediction turns out to have been correct, it provides stronger reason to believe the theory that generated it.

References[edit]

  1. Wu, Xufen; Kroupa, Pavel (2015). "Galactic rotation curves, the baryon-to-dark-halo-mass relation and space-time scale invariance". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 446 (1): 330–344. arXiv:1410.2256. Bibcode:2015MNRAS.446..330W. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2099. Unknown parameter |url-status= ignored (help)
  2. Milgrom, Mordehai (1983). "A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis". The Astrophysical Journal. 270: 365–370. Bibcode:1983ApJ...270..365M. doi:10.1086/161130. Unknown parameter |url-status= ignored (help)
  3. 3.0 3.1 McGaugh, Stacy S.; Lelli, Federico; Schombert, Jame M. (2016). "Radial Acceleration Relation in Rotationally Supported Galaxies". Physical Review Letters. 117 (20): 201101. arXiv:1609.05917. Bibcode:2016PhRvL.117t1101M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.201101. PMID 27886485. Unknown parameter |url-status= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |s2cid= ignored (help)
  4. Li, Pengfei; Lelli, Federico; McGaugh, Stacy S.; Schombert, Jame M. (2018). "Fitting the radial acceleration relation to individual SPARC galaxies" (PDF). Astronomy and Astrophysics. 615: A3. arXiv:1803.00022. Bibcode:2018A&A...615A...3L. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732547. Unknown parameter |url-status= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |s2cid= ignored (help)
  5. McGaugh, Stacy S. (2020). "Predictions and Outcomes for the Dynamics of Rotating Galaxies". Galaxies. 8 (2): 35. arXiv:2004.14402. Bibcode:2020Galax...8...35M. doi:10.3390/galaxies8020035. Unknown parameter |s2cid= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |url-status= ignored (help)
  6. Lelli, Federico; McGaugh, Stacy S.; Schombert, James M.; Pawlowski, Marcel (2017). "One Law to Rule Them All: The Radial Acceleration Relation of Galaxies". The Astrophysical Journal. 836 (2): 152–175. arXiv:1610.08981. Bibcode:2017ApJ...836..152L. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/152. Unknown parameter |url-status= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |s2cid= ignored (help)
  7. Merritt, David (2020). A Philosophical Approach to MOND: Assessing the Milgromian Research Program in Cosmology. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108610926. ISBN 9781108610926. Unknown parameter |url-status= ignored (help) Search this book on
  8. Worrall, John (1985). "Scientific discovery and theory-confirmation". In Pitt, J. C. Change and Progress in Modern Science. Reidel. pp. 201–331. ISBN 9789027718983. Search this book on
  9. Lipton, Peter (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation (2 ed.). Routledge. p. 170. ISBN 0-203-47085-0. Search this book on

External links[edit]


This article "Radial acceleration relation" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Radial acceleration relation. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.