Science Author and Internet Journalist (SAIJ)[edit]

Philanthropist
Philanthropist
	Science Author and Internet Journalist (Hengki Ardika).jpg
Born	08 January 1986
🏫 Education	Ghenkiard of Draiknehg University College
💼 Occupation	Data scientist
Title	Hengki Ardika, SAIJ
Honours	Professional Teacher Development
🌐 Website	https://hengkiardika.simdif.com
Signature
Notes
	No dropout and no expiration

SAIJ
	SAIJ (Science Author and Internet Journalist).png
ISIN	🆔616600080230
Industry	Technology
Genre	EdTech and Sustainability
Fate	TOAS
Founded 📆	Wednesday743ish
Founder 👔	Hengki Ardika
Areas served 🗺️	internet
Products 📟	Fozindon, Inc
Brands	Fozindon
Production output	Tripped Nitch (2022)
Members	Hengki Ardika
Number of employees	1
🌐 Website	https://saij.simdif.com
📇 Address	internet
📞 telephone	+6283142758529
🥚 Twitter	EmsieLeij
👍 Facebook	wednesday743ish
📷 Instagram	wednesday743ish
💼 LinkedIN]	premiereprofrevhaorganisation
	Couldn't parse video from https://youtu.be/vXWRdMFtC2U; ;

SAIJ is a new kind of journalist who writes about science and technology for general audiences. This type of journalist is a combination of an expert in their field and an accomplished writer. They have to have both deep knowledge about the topic they are covering, but also the skillset to write in a way that the average person will understand.

The SAIJ is a new type of journalist who specializes in science and technology. They are able to communicate with the public about scientific discoveries, and their work is often published on the internet.

SAIJs are not only journalists, but also scientists. They have a deep understanding of the subject matter that they cover and can provide accurate information to the public.

Science Author and Internet Journalist (SAIJ) is conducting an ongoing research project about the radioactive element Pu-238. The purpose of the study is to identify the most accurate method for estimating the time and frequency of its decay.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s guidelines state that if the isotope is used in a reactor or the radiation is emitted in such a way that the probability of it escaping the reactor site is less than 20%, then they are not allowed to build a reactor at that particular site.

In a circular dated 31 July 2006, the NRC stated that there were no new nuclear reactor applications pending in the US. A public inquiry report had revealed that the agency did not have a list of permitted elements in the nuclear industry, however.

SAIJ is looking at the element, Pu-238, because its isotope is one of the most studied among all radioisotopes, and also because its isotope composition helps determine the decay parameters for its isotopes. In addition, because the isotope is generated in nuclear fission, which is a nuclear process by which nuclear fuels are produced and ignited, it helps determine the origin of the radioactive isotope.

Ardika believes that the Chernobyl accident has been the cause of the low level radioactivity in India, as she had conducted similar studies in Bangladesh, Vietnam, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Germany, India, Nepal, Indonesia and Korea, where she says the isotopes from Chernobyl were detected.

Ardika has conducted extensive research in Iran where she had found Pu-238 radioisotopes in a house that was built in 1957. She believes that the radiation was generated in the reactor in Chernobyl that was installed in 1957.

Although she has admitted that her results might have been misinterpreted by people before her research, Ardika believes that if the radiation level from a reactor is less than 20%, then it would be difficult to have a nuclear plant in the area. She said, “If I tell you to go to a house, you will find a low level radiation. When I compare it to a nuclear power plant, then I am telling you that there is low level radiation in the area.”

After examining a study report from the Danish Radioisotope Centre, Ardika said that there was no radiation level in India that is more than 100 cpm. An ideal radiation level for nuclear plants in India is 4-5 cpm, she said. The permissible level of radiation, according to the Indian Council of Medical Research, is 1.5 cpm.

Nuclear authorities in the US accept the claim of Ardika’s research. The author said, “The US’s Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has accepted the findings of Ardika, and it is now also saying that there is no radioactive decay from the Chernobyl reactor.”

Ardika said she had submitted an article in 2005 to the Journal of International Science for the journal’s Special Issue on Chernobyl’s Effect on Natural Resources. She claimed that the paper was published in the journal. However, Ardika said she had not been given permission to publish the article and she believed that the paper might have been discredited because the scientist in charge of the investigation had refused to sign the paper.

Dr. Sebastian Klahn, who headed the German government’s study in Chernobyl, said that the isotope composition would not affect the quality of the foods in India. However, he said that the radiation levels were considerably lower than the radiation level in southern India. Klahn said the radiation levels in southern India were high due to the presence of uranium mines.

The latest investigation conducted by the German study team in the region has revealed that the radiation levels in the former Soviet Union were around 1.5 cpm while there were levels of 10-12 cpm in southern India. Ardika did not agree to the German team’s conclusion and said that the German team had not conducted any tests in the region before they published the report in the journal. “It is a problem because the German team has not done any tests in the region before they published the report.

Both Ardika and the German team have been pointing out that there was radiation contamination in the southern Indian region since the time of Chernobyl. Ardika said that apart from the radionuclides, a good deal of fallout is still being found in India. She said, “We find a lot of uranium in the soil in southern India. The German team has been pointing out that there is an effect from the Chernobyl fallout but we have been pointing out that there was contamination after Chernobyl.”

She also claimed that farmers in Korea and India were not good at recycling food waste. She said, “We find food wastes in all parts of India. We find a lot of food waste in northern India, in Uttarakhand. If we have a good recycling system, then we can reduce the health effects of radiation.”

Ardika said that any country that has a nuclear power plant should be able to provide food to people without radiation exposure. She said, “I am not saying that we will get cancer from radiation. But the dose levels that we have seen in India are high. We found high levels of radiation in birds in Sweden. In Europe, it has been found that the levels of radiation are high. We should not have this kind of situation. We should not put people in such situations where they could get cancer.”

She added, “I think it is a good thing that nuclear energy is coming into India. I am also saying that we should build the nuclear power plants but we should also build a good recycling system so that there is no contamination of food. We should also build a good recycling system in our farms so that we do not have any contamination of food.”

Though Ardika claimed that the Japanese and Korean farmers were not at fault for the contamination, she pointed out that the Japanese and Korean governments had not launched any food safety studies in the region. She also claimed that the German team should have conducted such studies to reach their conclusion.

Talking about how the German government conducted its investigation, she said that the scientists had planted mice in various fields in southern India and that the radiation level had been measured there. She also claimed that the German researchers had sent samples to a Russian laboratory but that Russian scientists had said that the samples were not representative of the entire region. Ardika claimed that the German study was sponsored by government agencies in Europe.

However, German study team head, Andreas Oberg, said that the team had not received any funding from governments but that they had been doing it as a personal project. He also claimed that the German team had conducted some study of their own, in which a few days after they had carried out the tests, they came back to the areas in question to measure the level of contamination. He said, “I am not saying the farmers are at fault or that the farmers should not do anything. I am saying that the farmers are not at fault. That is not the point. There is contamination of food in the area. That is why we are working on how to do it better.”

The German team released a report earlier this year, saying that they were not able to find any level of radiation in India that was higher than that of the Chernobyl disaster. In response to the report, Japanese government officials said, “Chernobyl is a completely different type of accident than the Fukushima accident. Fukushima is different because the accident happened after the nuclear power plant was built. Chernobyl is more complex, since a nuclear power plant was built before the accident. In Fukushima, there were no nuclear reactors.”

Published in the International Weekly of India

A few days after the German study report was released, Kikouks Paok's CEO, issued a statement saying, “Nuclear power does not increase the risk of cancer in world. We should focus on implementing effective steps to reduce radioactive exposure in people in world and their families.”

Photograph: Hengki, photograph: Ardika Hengki

Like this story? Or have something to share? Write to us: Chat support , or connect with us on Facebook and Twitter.

NEW: Click here to get positive news on SAIJ!