Space programs of the United States

From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki

The space program of the United States of America is led by government agencies like National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), military agencies like United States Space Force (USSF), and private companies like SpaceX. Its technological roots can be traced back to the late 1950s, when the United States began a ballistic missile program in response to perceived Soviet threats. The first US human spaceflight program began in the early 1960s, when an accelerated program of technological development culminated in Alan Shepard's successful 1961 flight aboard Mercury-Redstone 3. This achievement made the US the second country to independently send humans into space.

Funding for the space program occurs through the federal budget process, where it is mainly considered to be part of the nation's science policy. In the Obama administration's budget request for fiscal year 2011, NASA would receive $11.0 billion, out of a total research and development budget of $148.1 billion.[1] Other space activities are funded out of the research and development budget of the Department of Defense, and from the budgets of the other regulatory agencies involved with space issues.


American rocketry[edit]

Robert Goddard and his liquid-propellant rocket

In 1912 Robert Goddard, inspired from an early age by H. G. Wells, began a serious analysis of rockets, concluding that conventional solid-propellant rockets needed to be improved in three ways. First, fuel should be burned in a small combustion chamber, instead of building the entire propellant container to withstand the high pressures. Second, rockets could be arranged in stages. Finally, the exhaust speed (and thus the efficiency) could be greatly increased to beyond the speed of sound by using a de Laval nozzle. He patented these concepts in 1914,[2] and demonstrated a light battlefield rocket to the US Army Signal Corps only five days before the signing of the armistice that ended World War I. He also independently developed the mathematics of rocket flight.

In 1920, Goddard published his ideas and experimental results in A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes.[3] The work included remarks about sending a solid-fuel rocket to the Moon, which attracted worldwide attention and was both praised and ridiculed. A New York Times editorial suggested:

That Professor Goddard, with his 'chair' in Clark College and the countenancing of the Smithsonian Institution, does not know the relation of action to reaction, and of the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react – to say that would be absurd. Of course he only seems to lack the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools.

— New York Times (13 January 1920)[4]

His liquid-propellant rocket differed significantly from modern rockets in that the rocket engine was at the top and the fuel tank at the bottom of the rocket. He attached the de Laval nozzle to the combustion chamber. These nozzles turn the hot gas from the combustion chamber into a cooler, hypersonic, highly directed jet of gas, more than doubling the thrust and raising the engine efficiency from 2% to 64%. It was believed that, in flight, the rocket would "hang" from the engine like a pendulum from a pivot, and the weight of the fuel tank would be all that was needed to keep the rocket flying straight up. However, in reality, the stability of such a rocket is dependent on other factors. Basic Newtonian mechanics shows that Goddard's rocket is just as stable (or unstable) as it would be if the engine had been mounted below the fuel tank (as it is in most modern rockets).[citation needed]

German rocketry[edit]

Wernher von Braun (1912–1977), technical director of Nazi Germany's missile program, became the United States' lead rocket engineer during the 1950s and 1960s

Beginning in the 1930s and continuing during World War II, Nazi Germany researched and built operational ballistic missiles capable of suborbital spaceflight.[5] Starting in the early 1930s, during the last stages of the Weimar Republic, German aerospace engineers experimented with liquid-fueled rockets, with the goal that one day they would be capable of reaching high altitudes and traversing long distances.[6] The head of the German Army's Ballistics and Munitions Branch, Lieutenant Colonel Karl Emil Becker, gathered a small team of engineers that included Walter Dornberger and Leo Zanssen, to figure out how to use rockets as long-range artillery in order to get around the Treaty of Versailles' ban on research and development of long-range cannons.[7] Wernher von Braun, a young engineering prodigy, was recruited by Becker and Dornberger to join their secret army program at Kummersdorf-West in 1932.[8] Von Braun dreamed of conquering outer space with rockets and did not initially see the military value in missile technology.[9]

During the Second World War, General Dornberger was the military head of the army's rocket program, Zanssen became the commandant of the Peenemünde army rocket center, and von Braun was the technical director of the ballistic missile program.[10] They led the team that built the Aggregat-4 (A-4) rocket, which became the first vehicle to reach outer space during its test flight program in 1942 and 1943.[11] By 1943, Germany began mass-producing the A-4 as the Vergeltungswaffe 2 ("Vengeance Weapon" 2, or more commonly, V2), a ballistic missile with a 320 kilometers (200 mi) range carrying a 1,130 kilograms (2,490 lb) warhead at 4,000 kilometers per hour (2,500 mph).[12] Its supersonic speed meant there was no defense against it, and radar detection provided little warning.[13] Germany used the weapon to bombard southern England and parts of Allied-liberated western Europe from 1944 until 1945.[14] After the war, the V2 became the basis of early American and Soviet rocket designs.[15][16]

At war's end, Wernher von Braun and his team were sent to the United States Army's White Sands Proving Ground, located in New Mexico.[17] They set about assembling the captured V2s and began a program of launching them and instructing American engineers in their operation.[18] These tests led to the first rocket to take photos from outer space, and the first two-stage rocket, the WAC Corporal-V2 combination, in 1949.[18] The German rocket team was moved from Fort Bliss to the Army's new Redstone Arsenal, located in Huntsville, Alabama, in 1950.[19] From here, von Braun and his team developed the Army's first operational medium-range ballistic missile, the Redstone rocket, that in slightly modified versions, launched both America's first satellite, and the first piloted Mercury space missions.[19] It became the basis for both the Jupiter and Saturn family of rockets.[19]

Creation of NASA[edit]

NASA programs[edit]


Military programs[edit]

Corona program (1958–1972)[edit]

Missile Defense Alarm System (1960–1966)[edit]

Manned Orbiting Laboratory (1963–1969)[edit]

X-37B OTV program (2006–present)[edit]

In 1999, NASA selected Boeing to design and develop an orbital vehicle, built by the California branch of Boeing's Phantom Works. Over a four-year period, a total of US$192 million was spent on the project, with NASA contributing $109 million, the United States Air Force (USAF) $16 million, and Boeing $67 million. In late 2002, a new $301-million contract was awarded to Boeing as part of NASA's Space Launch Initiative framework.[20] The result vehicle is called X-37.

On November 17, 2006, the USAF announced that it would develop its own variant of X-37. The USAF version was designated the X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle (OTV). The OTV program was built on earlier industry and government efforts by DARPA, NASA, and the Air Force under the leadership of the U.S. Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office in partnership with NASA and the Air Force Research Laboratory. Boeing was the prime contractor for the OTV program.[21][22][23] The X-37B was designed to remain in orbit for up to 270 days at a time.[24] The Secretary of the Air Force stated that the OTV program would focus on "risk reduction, experimentation, and operational concept development for reusable space vehicle technologies, in support of long-term developmental space objectives".[22]

Most of the activities of the X-37B project are secret. The official USAF statement is that the project is "an experimental test program to demonstrate technologies for a reliable, reusable, uncrewed space test platform for the U.S. Air Force".[25] Despite this statement, some media speculated that X-37B could be used as a spy satellite.[26][27]

Private spaceflight programs[edit]

Scaled Composites Tier One (1990s–2004)[edit]

SpaceX Mars program (2012–present)[edit]

SpaceX Starlink (2015–present)[edit]

Failures and setbacks[edit]

Apollo disasters and cutbacks[edit]

Burnt cabin of Apollo 1
Damaged service module of Apollo 13

Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee decided to name their flight Apollo 1 as a motivational focus on the first crewed flight. They trained and conducted tests of their spacecraft at North American, and in the altitude chamber at the Kennedy Space Center. A "plugs-out" test began on the morning of January 27, 1967, which would simulate a launch countdown on LC-34 with the spacecraft transferring from pad-supplied to internal power. However, an electrical fire began in the cabin and spread quickly in the high pressure, 100% oxygen atmosphere. The astronauts were asphyxiated before the hatch could be opened for rescue.[28]

The Apollo program operated almost flawlessly for three years after the Apollo 1 incident, until the liquid oxygen tank of Apollo 13 service exploded, forcing the crew to use the Lunar Module as a "lifeboat" to return to Earth, on April 13, 1970. Another NASA review board was convened to determine the cause, which turned out to be a combination of damage of the tank in the factory, and a subcontractor not making a tank component according to updated design specifications.[29] Apollo was grounded again, for the remainder of 1970 while the oxygen tank was redesigned and an extra one was added.[30]

About the time of the first landing in 1969, it was decided to use an existing Saturn V to launch the Skylab orbital laboratory pre-built on the ground, replacing the original plan to construct it in orbit from several Saturn IB launches; this eliminated Apollo 20. NASA's yearly budget also began to shrink in light of the successful landing, and NASA also had to make funds available for the development of the upcoming Space Shuttle. By 1971, the decision was made to also cancel missions 18 and 19.[31]

The cutbacks forced mission planners to reassess the original planned landing sites in order to achieve the most effective geological sample and data collection from the remaining four missions. Apollo 15 had been planned to be the last of the H series missions, but since there would be only two subsequent missions left, it was changed to the first of three J missions.[32]

Space Shuttle disasters[edit]

Challenger disaster

In the course of 135 Space Shuttle missions flown, two orbiters were destroyed, with loss of crew totalling 14 astronauts:

  • Challenger – lost 73 seconds after liftoff, STS-51-L, January 28, 1986
  • Columbia – lost approximately 16 minutes before its expected landing, STS-107, February 1, 2003

Close-up video footage of Challenger during its final launch on January 28, 1986 clearly shows that the problems began due to an O-ring failure on the right Solid Rocket Booster (SRB). The hot plume of gas leaking from the failed joint caused the collapse of the external tank, which then resulted in the orbiter's disintegration due to high aerodynamic stress. The accident resulted in the loss of all seven astronauts on board. Endeavour (OV-105) was built to replace Challenger (using structural spare parts originally intended for the other orbiters) and delivered in May 1991; it was first launched a year later.

The accidents did not just affect the technical design of the orbiter, but also NASA.[33] After the loss of Challenger, NASA grounded the Space Shuttle program for over two years, making numerous safety changes recommended by the Rogers Commission Report.

The Space Shuttle program operated accident-free for seventeen years after the Challenger disaster, until Columbia broke up on reentry, killing all seven crew members, on February 1, 2003. The ultimate cause of the accident was a piece of foam separating from the external tank moments after liftoff and striking the leading edge of the orbiter's left wing, puncturing one of the reinforced carbon-carbon (RCC) panels that covered the wing edge and protected it during reentry. As Columbia reentered the atmosphere at the end of an otherwise normal mission, hot gas penetrated the wing and destroyed it from the inside out, causing the orbiter to lose control and disintegrate.

After the Columbia disaster, the International Space Station operated on a skeleton crew of two for more than two years and was serviced primarily by Russian spacecraft. While the "Return to Flight" mission STS-114 in 2005 was successful, a similar piece of foam from a different portion of the tank was shed. Although the debris did not strike Discovery, the program was grounded once again for this reason.

Mars Climate Orbiter (1998–1999)[edit]

"Shuttle gap" (2011–2020)[edit]

See also[edit]

Other articles of the topic Spaceflight : Ashley Williams (Mass Effect), bluShift Aerospace, Falcon 9 booster B1019, GASPACS, List of space launch system designs, Apollo 13 Mission Operations Team, Beta Ursae Majoris

Other articles of the topic United States : Cannabis and lobbying efforts, Greek response to Orthodox Church in America autocephaly, Grady A. Dugas, M.D., Toringdon, Rogue Squadron (film), Grizzlor, Kansas City, Missouri
Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "".Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "".

  • Chinese space program
  • Indian Space Research Organisation
  • Japanese space program
  • Space exploration



  1. Clemins, Patrick J. "Introduction to the Federal Budget" (PDF). American Association for the Advancement of Science. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 13, 2011. Retrieved February 8, 2011. Unknown parameter |url-status= ignored (help)
  2. "US patent 1,102,653". 1914-07-07. Retrieved 2012-12-10.
  3. Goddard 1919
  4. "Topics of the Times". New York Times. January 13, 1920. Archived from the original on 2008-02-09. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
  5. Neufeld, Michael J (1995). The Rocket and the Reich: Peenemünde and the Coming of the Ballistic Missile Era. New York: The Free Press. pp. 158, 160–162, 190. Search this book on Logo.png
  6. Cornwell (2003), p. 147
  7. Cornwell (2004), p. 146
  8. Cornwell (2003), p. 148
  9. Cornwell (2003), p. 150
  10. Burrows (1998), p. 96
  11. Burrows (1998), pp. 99–100
  12. Burrows (1998), pp. 98–99
  13. Stocker (2004), pp. 12–24
  14. Gainor (2001), p. 68
  15. Schefter (1999), p. 29
  16. Siddiqi (2003a), p. 41
  17. Burrows (1998), p. 123
  18. 18.0 18.1 Burrows (1998), pp. 129–134
  19. 19.0 19.1 19.2 Burrows (1998), p. 137
  20. "X-37 Technology Demonstrator: Blazing the trail for the next generation of space transportation systems" (PDF). NASA Facts. NASA. September 2003. FS-2003-09-121-MSFC This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain. Retrieved 23 April 2010.
  21. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named sfnow20100402
  22. 22.0 22.1 David, Leonard (17 November 2006). "U.S. Air Force Pushes For Orbital Test Vehicle". Archived from the original on 24 July 2008. Retrieved 17 November 2006. Unknown parameter |url-status= ignored (help)
  23. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named spaceplane_to_orbit
  24. Clark, Stephen (25 February 2010). "Air Force X-37B spaceplane arrives in Florida for launch". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on 1 March 2010. Retrieved 3 March 2010. Unknown parameter |url-status= ignored (help)
  25. "Fact Sheet: X-37 Orbital Test Vehicle". U.S. Air Force. 21 May 2010. Archived from the original on 26 June 2014. Unknown parameter |url-status= ignored (help)
  26. Burghardt, Tom (11 May 2010). "The Militarization of Outer Space: The Pentagon's Space Warriors". Space Daily. Retrieved 15 October 2012.
  27. Parnell, Brid-Aine (6 January 2012). "US 'space warplane' may be spying on Chinese spacelab". The Register. Archived from the original on 8 January 2012. Retrieved 13 January 2012. Unknown parameter |url-status= ignored (help)
  28. Seamans, Robert C., Jr. (April 5, 1967). "Findings, Determinations And Recommendations". Report of Apollo 204 Review Board. NASA History Office. Retrieved October 7, 2007. Search this book on Logo.png
  29. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named KSC-Apollo_13
  30. Compton 1989, Chapter 11-7: "Mission to Fra Mauro". p. 199
  31. Compton 1989, Chapter 11-7: "Cutbacks and Program Changes". pp. 201-202
  32. Williams, David (December 11, 2003). "Apollo 18 through 20 - The Cancelled Missions". NASA Space Science Data Coordinated Archive. Retrieved June 11, 2016.
  33. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named

This article "Space programs of the United States" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Space programs of the United States. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.