may I ask why it is Bad content or any other? many of articles even don't have sources even they exist! this articles as significant and independent sources almost 32 sources si why Bad content? why you're deleting it?
Hello, the article was tagged because it does not meet our rules on reliable sources. Its main claims (titles, chancellor of a university since the age of 18, polymath) are not supported by independent, verifiable sources: most references are press releases, documents uploaded by the author on archive.org or Zenodo, IMDb entries or websites that cannot be verified. It also presents religious controversies about a living person without reliable sources. The number of references is not the criterion: their independence and reliability are. The article will not be restored in this form. Kind regards, the EverybodyWiki team
