Wilmott v Johnson
From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki
| Wilmott v Johnson | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
| Full case name | ROBERT MALCOLM WILMOTT and JANET MARY WILMOTT Appellants v PETER GORDON JOHNSON and LYNNE MARIE JOHNSON and HUBBARD CHURCHER TRUST MANAGEMENT LIMITED as trustees of the BEATRICE M TRUST First Respondents AND GAVIN WILLIAM EASTWICK and MICHAEL CLARENCE WALKER as trustees of the HARRIS FAMILY TRUST Second Respondents |
| Decided | 12 December 2002 |
| Citation(s) | [2003] 1 NZLR 649 |
| Transcript(s) | Court of Appeal judgment |
| Court membership | |
| Judge(s) sitting | McGrath J, Glazebrook J, Baragwanath J |
Wilmott v Johnson [2003] 1 NZLR 649 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding whether a response or inquiry amounts to a counter offer.[1]
References[edit]
- ↑ Chetwin, Maree; Graw, Stephen; Tiong, Raymond (2006). An introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand (4th ed.). Thomson Brookers. p. [page needed]. ISBN 0-86472-555-8. Search this book on
 | This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub. You can help EverybodyWiki by expanding it. |
This article "Wilmott v Johnson" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Wilmott v Johnson. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.
