Advanced Aerospace Vehicle
The term was used on Science.Gov, "This theoretical cost model, first advocated by early work at MIT, has been expanded to cover the basic structures of an advanced aerospace vehicle. Elemental costs based on the geometry of the design can be summed up to provide an overall estimation of the total production cost for a design configuration."
In a recent article on Space.com, the following statement were made in regards to SpaceX: Vanderbilt draws from a reservoir of observations, and he served up a top-of-the list tenet. "Rule number one of projects is, it will take longer and cost more than you planned…doubly so for advanced aerospace vehicle projects," he said. "Currently, just two reusable human-carrying commercial space vehicles are in flight test mode — SpaceX's Falcon 9 Reusable (F9R) development vehicle/Dragon capsule and Virgin Galactic's SpaceShip2." [1]
Airforce Magazine said, "'USAF is far from deciding which missions would be suitable for the TAV or, indeed, whether it will need, or will be able to afford, the spacecraft-aircraft. It is still studying a number of “advanced aerospace vehicle” concepts, including the TAV. But it began taking he TAV idea more seriously, and talking more openly about it, following two main events. [2]
References[edit]
- ↑ "Will Commercial Space Travel Blast Off in 2014?". Space.com. Unknown parameter
|url-status=ignored (help) - ↑ "Bold New Missions in Space". Airforce Magazine. Unknown parameter
|url-status=ignored (help)
External Links[edit]
This article "Advanced Aerospace Vehicle" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Advanced Aerospace Vehicle. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.
