📜 Post with us on Reddit
📝 Create a new article
🏭 Create a company page
🇬🇧 - in English
🇫🇷 - en Français (FR)
🇵🇹 - em Português (PT)
🇩🇪 - auf Deutsch (DE)
🇯🇵 - 日本語で (JA)
Sponsored articles

You can edit almost every page by Creating an account and confirming your email.

Criticism of North Korea

From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki


Demonstrations against the North Korean dictatorship in the U.S. Capitol, July 2012

North Korea has faced global criticism and condemnation ever since its establishment in 1948 due to its governing system systematically operates in direct opposition to global norms of human rights, international law, nuclear program, and regional security. Template:Human rights in North Korea North Korea has been extensively and repeatedly criticized by other countries. While a small circle of allies defends or shields the nation, the overwhelming majority of the international community has actively condemned North Korea's actions for decades.[1] Criticism by other countries is organized and expressed through several primary channels. The United States, South Korea, and Japan are the most vocal critics of Pyongyang. They frequently release joint statements condemning North Korea's missile launches and nuclear tests as direct threats to regional and global security. Countries across Europe, along with nations like Canada and Australia, regularly issue heavy diplomatic condemnations regarding both North Korea's weapons programs and its treatment of its citizens.[2][3] For over 20 consecutive years, the United Nations General Assembly has passed an annual resolution condemning the "long-standing and ongoing systematic, widespread, and gross violations of human rights" in North Korea. The vast majority of the world's 190+ countries consistently vote in favor of these condemnations.[4] Because of North Korea's violations of international law, the United Nations Security Council has passed numerous rounds of strict economic and trade sanctions. Even though some countries fail to perfectly enforce them, dozens of nations across the globe have agreed to limit or entirely cut off trade, financial services, and military cooperation with North Korea to comply with these global demands.[5]

Criticisms of Israeli policies come from several groups: primarily from international bodies, independent human rights organizations, foreign governments, mass media, North Korean defectors, and activists.[6] Media bias is often claimed by both critics and defenders of North Korea.[7]

Counter-criticisms generally fall into two distinct categories: official defenses and deflections by the North Korean government itself (and its allies), and external critiques by scholars and journalists regarding how the Western world perceives and reports on the country.[8]

Subjects of criticism

Systematic human rights violations

The United Nations and prominent watchdogs like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have classified North Korea as having a human rights record with virtually no contemporary parallel. A landmark UN Commission of Inquiry (COI) report concluded that North Korea's state-sponsored atrocities amounted to crimes against humanity.[9] Independent journalism, foreign media, and the internet are strictly forbidden.[10] Accessing or distributing outside content—especially South Korean pop culture or dramas—is considered "anti-socialist behavior" punishable by hard labor or death.[11]

The state sorts every citizen into a socio-political class based on their family's perceived loyalty to the ruling Kim family. The rigid classification dictates an individual's access to quality education, employment, housing, and even adequate medical care. If an individual is accused of a political crime or attempts to defect, the state frequently imprisons up to three generations of their family to root out dissent.[12]

Crimes against humanity

The accusations of crimes against humanity against North Korea represent the most severe level of international legal condemnation aimed at the regime. They state that the government's abuses are not merely random acts of cruelty, but rather a coordinated, state-sanctioned assault on its own population.[13]

Assassination of Kim Jong-nam

Main article: Assassination of Kim Jong-nam

Kim Jong-nam, the estranged older half-brother of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, was assassinated in a busy terminal at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport in Malaysia on February 13, 2017. The attack involved two women who smeared the liquid nerve agent VX—a highly lethal substance classified by the United Nations as a chemical weapon of mass destruction—on his face.[14]

South Korean officials immediately called the assassination an "intolerable crime against humanity" and a blatant act of state terrorism. They asserted that the plot was orchestrated directly by the North Korean government to eliminate a potential rival to Kim's rule. Critics pointed to the brazen daylight killing as further evidence of Kim's ruthless consolidation of power.[15] The United States government officially determined that North Korea was responsible for the assassination using VX. The U.S. State Department strongly condemned the act as a "public display of contempt for universal norms against chemical weapons use" and imposed additional economic sanctions on Pyongyang.[16] The brazen use of a chemical weapon to assassinate an individual in a crowded international airport was a primary factor leading the United States to place North Korea back on its list of state sponsors of terrorism later in 2017. The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) expressed "grave concern" over the incident and called for those responsible for using chemical weapons to be held strictly accountable.[17]

The plot drew immense condemnation because North Korean agents duped two young women (one from Vietnam and one from Indonesia) into carrying out the lethal attack. The women testified that they were tricked by operatives into believing they were participating in a harmless prank for a reality television show.[18]

Malaysia, which had historically maintained relatively friendly, visa-free ties with North Korea, was furious that a weapon of mass destruction was unleashed on its soil. This sparked a major diplomatic crisis, resulting in both countries expelling each other's ambassadors. Because North Korean operatives manipulated citizens from Vietnam and Indonesia to do their bidding, relationships with those Southeast Asian nations were severely strained.[19] North Korean officials eventually had to issue an informal apology to Vietnam to prevent a total severing of diplomatic ties.[20][21]

Specific crimes enumerated by the United Nations

Under international law (specifically the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court), crimes against humanity consist of specific acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population. The United Nations found North Korea guilty of committing nearly all of them, including extermination, murder, enslavement, forced labour, forcible transfer of populations, imprisonment in political concentration camps, torture, inhumane treatment, rape, sexual violence, starvation, and enforced disappearances.[22]

While the UN General Assembly has repeatedly passed resolutions urging the UN Security Council to refer North Korea and its leaders to the International Criminal Court (ICC) for these crimes, no formal international trial has taken place. This is because China and Russia utilize their permanent veto powers on the Security Council to block any referred action or harsher punishments against Pyongyang.[23][24][25][26][27]

Nuclear defiance and military provocations

A political protest or demonstration featuring a large globe prop and a person wearing a mask of Kim Jong Un standing next to a mock missile.

Since withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in the 1990s, North Korea has been condemned for building a rogue nuclear arsenal.[28] The state has conducted multiple nuclear tests and launched hundreds of ballistic missiles in direct violation of numerous UN Security Council resolutions.[29] Constant missile tests over Japan and aggressive military posturing against South Korea have made Pyongyang a leading threat to peace in the Asia-Pacific region. Critics condemn the regime for pouring billions of dollars into advanced military technology while the general population faces chronic food insecurity and collapsing public healthcare.[30]

International bodies, including the United Nations, frequently criticize North Korea for launching missiles without issuing standard international airspace or maritime safety notifications, endangering civilian aircraft and ships.[31] A primary point of criticism from human rights groups and foreign governments is that the regime spends billions of dollars on advanced military technology and nuclear warheads while its own population suffers from chronic food insecurity, malnutrition, and a collapsing public healthcare system.[32] Critics heavily condemn the regime's shift toward aggressive nuclear doctrines.[33]

State-sponsored criminal activities

To bypass international sanctions and fund its military projects, the state has actively participated in illegal global activities. North Korean state-backed hacking groups have stolen billions in cryptocurrency from international exchanges and executed large-scale ransomware attacks on global infrastructure. The regime has a history of manufacturing high-quality counterfeit currency and producing illicit narcotics for global black markets.[34]

International abductions

During the Cold War (particularly the 1970s and 1980s), North Korea drew intense global condemnation for orchestrating the kidnapping of foreign nationals. Citizens from Japan, South Korea, and other nations were abducted and smuggled to North Korea to train regime spies in foreign languages and customs. By combining an absolute totalitarian grip on its citizens with a highly aggressive, nuclear-armed foreign policy, North Korea remains a primary focal point for global condemnation.[9]

Comparisons with Nazi Germany

Hitler in 1937
Kim in 2023

North Korea has been directly compared to Nazi Germany.[35] The comparison is not merely used as internet hyperbole; it has been invoked by the United Nations, human rights scholars, and even Holocaust survivors to describe the severity and nature of the regime's actions.[36]

The most famous and authoritative comparison came from the landmark 2014 UN Commission of Inquiry (COI) on human rights in North Korea. The chair of the commission, retired Australian judge Michael Kirby, stated that the evidence of state-sponsored atrocities in North Korea revealed a totalitarian system that was "strikingly similar" to the crimes committed by Nazi Germany during World War II. Kirby specifically noted that testimonies regarding the political prison camps (kwanliso)—where emaciated bodies of starved prisoners were burned and used as crop fertilizer—brought back the harrowing memories and images of the liberation of Nazi concentration camps in 1945. Kirby held up the report to the international community and stated that, unlike the public during World War II who claimed they did not know the extent of the Nazi camps, the world now has detailed evidence of North Korea's crimes and has no excuse for inaction.[37]

North Korea's network of massive political prison camps operates on a scale of brutality that researchers compare directly to both Nazi concentration camps and the Soviet Gulags. Both regimes practiced the concept of collective familial punishment. In Nazi Germany, the was known as Sippenhaft. In North Korea, up to three generations of a defector's or political dissident's family can be sent to forced labor camps to "wash out" the treasonous blood. Both states mandated absolute, unquestioning devotion to a singular leader, enforced by extreme propaganda and a complete state monopoly on information.[38]

Criticism tactics

Eyewitness testimonies

Because verifying information inside North Korea is incredibly difficult, first-hand accounts from those who have successfully escaped the country serve as the most powerful tool for criticism.[39] Defectors have testified before the United Nations, the U.S. Congress, and international parliaments to share harrowing stories of political prison camps, forced starvation, and extreme surveillance. High-profile memoirs, like Escape from Camp 14, have served as global tools to mobilize public outrage. In recent years, younger North Korean defectors in South Korea have taken to digital platforms like YouTube to create vlogs. These videos aim to educate the public about the realities of daily life in the North while directly challenging both the regime's propaganda and external stereotypes.[40][41]

Protests

Most demonstrations occur in Seoul, South Korea, and are often led by defectors and human rights activists.[42] Activists frequently gather at the Chinese embassy in Seoul to protest the forced repatriation of North Korean refugees. Rallies often follow North Korean military provocations, such as the missile launches reported in April 2026, where protesters condemned the regime's nuclear development. Protesters regularly call for an end to political prison camps and "guilt by association" laws.[43]

Rigorous fact-finding and high-tech verification

Human rights watchdogs and international institutions have adapted to North Korea's information blackout by pivoting to alternative evidence-gathering tactics. Organizations like Human Rights Watch and the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea (HRNK) use high-resolution commercial satellite imagery to bypass the regime's secrecy. They actively track the expansion of political prison camps (kwanliso), documentation of forced labor sites, and the construction of border walls. The UN has utilized formal investigative panels. The most notable was the 2014 UN Commission of Inquiry (COI) report, which systematically compiled defector interviews and satellite data to officially categorize the state's abuses as "crimes against humanity".[44]

Piercing the information barrier

Rather than just criticizing the regime to the outside world, activists use active counter-propaganda tactics to encourage criticism within North Korea, which is called "information infiltration".[45] Activists and NGOs use balloons, river floats, and physical smuggling networks to send USB flash drives, micro-SD cards, and portable media players (like "notels") across the border. These drives contain uncensored world news, Wikipedia entries, and South Korean dramas to break the regime's monopoly on information and encourage skepticism among citizens. Organizations broadcast independent news and cultural programs into North Korea via shortwave radio. Since radio waves cannot be fully blocked by physical walls, this remains a consistent tactic to criticize the state directly to its people.[46][47]

Online

Online criticism of North Korea is unique because the country is largely a "black box" with no open internet access for its general population. Because ordinary North Koreans cannot go online to voice their own grievances, the digital landscape of criticism is shaped entirely by outsiders, defectors, and internet culture.[48][49]

Due to the absurdity of the regime's extreme propaganda and isolated nature, a large portion of the online discourse surrounding North Korea is driven by satire and internet memes. Images of Kim are frequently turned into memes mocking his weight, his haircut, and the absolute control he demands. On platforms like Weibo, where the Chinese government heavily monitors search terms to protect its ally, users have historically invented clever, coded nicknames to mock the leader (like "Jin San Pang" or "Kim Fatty the Third") to bypass algorithmic censors. Critics of internet culture point out that treating North Korea purely as a source of comedy can be dangerous. By reducing the nation to an "absurdist cartoon" of incompetence and funny haircuts, internet memes can accidentally downplay the severe, real-life suffering of the North Korean people.[50]

Thousands of escapees who have successfully defected have used the global internet to expose the realities of life under the regime. Defectors regularly participate in YouTube interviews, Reddit "Ask Me Anything" (AMA) sessions, and podcasts to detail their experiences with famine, public executions, and escaping through China. Defector-led non-governmental organizations use crowdfunding and social media campaigns to raise awareness and fund operations to smuggle information (like news and K-dramas on USB flash drives) back into North Korea to break the state's information monopoly.[51]

When North Korea attempts to use the global internet for its own soft-power propaganda, online communities are quick to criticize and dismantle it. In recent years, accounts promoting a suspiciously rosy, highly produced view of North Korean life have appeared on platforms like Instagram and TikTok. Internet users routinely mock these videos for their stiff dialogue and obvious staging, pointing out that ordinary citizens do not have internet access or the freedom to make casual aesthetic vlogs. When North Korea released a highly produced, catchy pop song praising Kim, it went viral on TikTok as a background track for Gen Z dance trends. While many users found it genuinely catchy or used it ironically, internet commentators and journalists heavily criticized the trend for normalizing and making "kitsch" the image of a dictator accused of crimes against humanity.[52]

A specific subset of online criticism focuses on how Western media outlets cover the Hermit Kingdom. Media critics on forums and independent journalism sites point out that because solid facts are so hard to verify, major outlets are highly vulnerable to clickbait. They frequently run sensationalized, unverified rumors from single anonymous sources (such as claims that officials were executed by anti-aircraft guns or fed to dogs) that later turn out to be exaggerated or completely false.[48]

Suppression of criticism

The suppression of criticism of North Korea occurs on two completely different fronts: domestically, where the regime uses absolute totalitarian terror to prevent its own citizens from speaking out, and internationally, where the state and its powerful allies work to block or dilute global condemnation.[53]

Domestic

Inside North Korea, any form of criticism against the Supreme Leader, the ruling Workers' Party, or the state is treated as a severe political crime.[54][55] In the 2020s, North Korea enacted a series of draconian laws to aggressively stamp out any ideological non-conformity. To ensure nobody speaks out, the state employs collective punishment. If a person is accused of criticizing the regime or attempting to defect, up to three generations of their family can be sent to brutal political prison camps (kwanliso). Neighbors are forced to monitor one another through local watch groups (inminban). A single offhand critical remark overheard by an informant can result in immediate arrest by the Ministry of State Security. While mobile phone use has risen in North Korea, all devices must feature state-mandated monitoring software (such as the "signature system") that prevents users from opening unapproved files or accessing the global internet.[56]

International

Because North Korea cannot directly stop foreign governments and activists from criticizing it, the regime relies on its allies and aggressive deflections to suppress the impact of that criticism.[57] The most effective suppression of international criticism happens at the United Nations Security Council. Harsher punishments or referrals of North Korean leaders to the International Criminal Court are routinely blocked by the veto powers of China and Russia. Whenever Western nations or the UN issue reports criticizing North Korea's human rights record, North Korean diplomats actively dismiss the claims as a "smear campaign" driven by hostile U.S. foreign policy. They routinely pivot to criticizing racism, gun violence, and poverty in the United States to deflect attention.[58]

North Korea heavily suppresses the credibility of defectors—who serve as the primary source of information about the country's interior. State media regularly brands defectors as "human scum" or criminals who have been paid by Western intelligence agencies to fabricate stories. The regime's aggressive posturing and digital operations have made it difficult for outside NGOs to operate. International watchdogs, like those cited by Human Rights Watch, have noted that global shifts in geopolitical focus have at times threatened the funding of civil society groups and radio broadcasters that try to pierce North Korea's information barrier.[59]

Responses to criticism

North Korea responds to international criticism with a combination of fierce denial, aggressive counter-accusations, and strategic deflection.[60] Because the regime views any outside criticism as a direct threat to the legitimacy of the Kim dynasty and its state sovereignty, its responses are highly calculated. When confronted with reports of human rights abuses from the UN or global watchdogs, North Korea routinely dismisses them as "lies and fabrications". They claim that testimonies provided by defectors are manufactured by "criminals" paid by Western intelligence agencies. For example, state media recently denounced a UN Human Rights Council resolution as a "political fraud document" and a "provocation".[61]

North Korea argues that the West does not care about human rights and is simply using the issue as a weapon to topple its socialist system. When criticized by U.S. officials for being a "rogue state," North Korea's Ministry of foreign affairs responded by labeling the U.S. the "most depraved state in the world" and cited the remarks as proof of an unchanging "hostile policy".[62][63] To deflect attention, North Korean diplomats frequently point out the domestic failures of its critics. They routinely highlight gun violence, racial discrimination, and homelessness in the United States, arguing that Western nations lack the moral authority to criticize others.[64]

Criticism regarding North Korea's nuclear weapons and ballistic missile tests is met with the argument that its arsenal is a necessary, defensive deterrent against U.S. imperialism and the threat of invasion. North Korea reacts incredibly harshly to how it is portrayed in foreign media. The regime has released furious statements condemning South Korean dramas and films, such as Crash Landing on You, calling them "deceptive, fabricated, absurd, and impure" strategic propaganda.[65]

Exceptions and limited engagement

Despite its aggressive public stance, defectors and former diplomats have noted that the regime is actually deeply sensitive to international pressure. To control the narrative and avoid the embarrassment of recorded votes, North Korea has occasionally participated in specific UN human rights mechanisms, such as the Universal Periodic Review (UPR), to argue its own definition of human rights.[66]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Kim, Sang (2025-12-12). "UN Condemnation of North Korea's Human Rights Abuses Holds Firm Despite Political Shifts". Korea Economic Institute of America. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  2. ↑ "What to Know About Sanctions on North Korea | Council on Foreign Relations". www.cfr.org. 2022-07-27. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  3. ↑ Action, the Center for Preventive. "North Korea Crisis". Global Conflict Tracker. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  4. ↑ unwatch (2015-11-20). "China, Russia, Venezuela Shield North Korea From Criticism at UN General Assembly". UN Watch. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  5. ↑ "Countries Involved in Violating UNSC Resolutions on North Korea | ISIS Reports | Institute For Science And International Security". isis-online.org. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  6. ↑ "North Korea: Deteriorating human rights situation calls for international attention". Amnesty International. 2023-02-07. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  7. ↑ "Human rights in North Korea". Amnesty International. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  8. ↑ Park, Madison (2014-03-18). "China, North Korea slam U.N. human rights report as 'divorced from reality'". CNN. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Human Rights Watch (2024-12-12), "North Korea: Events of 2024", Share this via Facebook, retrieved 2026-04-12
  10. ↑ Bae, Joonbum; Lee, YuJung Julia (2024-09-02). "Human rights versus national security in public opinion on foreign affairs: South Korean views of North Korea 2008–2019". Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 37 (5): 690–712. doi:10.1080/09557571.2024.2361119. ISSN 0955-7571.
  11. ↑ "North Korea's human rights: What's not being talked about". www.bbc.com. 2019-02-18. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  12. ↑ "UN: North Korea worst human rights violator". dw.com. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  13. ↑ "Prioritizing Action after the Update to the Commission of Inquiry on North Korean Human Rights | Hudson Institute". www.hudson.org. 2026-03-16. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  14. ↑ "Kim Jong-nam killing: North Korea condemns Malaysia". BBC News. 2017-02-23. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  15. ↑ "The Death of Kim Jong Nam | Council on Foreign Relations". www.cfr.org. 2017-02-16. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  16. ↑ Haas, Benjamin (2018-03-07). "US says North Korea assassinated Kim Jong-nam with chemical weapon". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  17. ↑ Gladstone, Rick (2018-03-07). "U.S. Slaps Sanctions on North Korea Over Use of Nerve Agent in Assassination". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  18. ↑ Berlinger, Joshua (2019-05-02). "As last jailed Kim Jong Nam killing suspect freed, a gripping murder mystery ends with a whimper". CNN. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  19. ↑ Columns, Syndicated (2017-02-25). "North Korea's evasion of responsibility in Kim Jong Nam murder deplorable: Yomiuri Shimbun editorial". oregonlive. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  20. ↑ CNA (2020-09-25). North Korea's Kim Jong-un apologises for killing of South Korean official. Retrieved 2026-04-12 – via YouTube.
  21. ↑ "Kim Jong-Nam killing: War of words after death of North Korean". Yahoo News. 2017-03-02. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  22. ↑ "North Korea: UN Commission documents wide-ranging and ongoing crimes against humanity, urges referral to ICC". OHCHR. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  23. ↑ Park, Michael Pearson,Jason Hanna,Madison (2014-02-17). "'Abundant evidence' of crimes against humanity in North Korea, panel says". CNN. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  24. ↑ Ulferts, Gregory; Howard, Terry L. (2017). "North Korean Human Rights Abuses and Their Consequences". North Korean Review. 13 (2): 84–92. ISSN 1551-2789. JSTOR 26396124.
  25. ↑ Song, Jooyoung (2011). "Understanding China's Response to North Korea's Provocations". Asian Survey. 51 (6): 1134–1155. doi:10.1525/as.2011.51.6.1134. ISSN 0004-4687. JSTOR 10.1525/as.2011.51.6.1134.
  26. ↑ Snyder, Scott (2000). "North Korea's Challenge of Regime Survival: Internal Problems and Implications for the Future". Pacific Affairs. 73 (4): 517–533. doi:10.2307/2672442. ISSN 0030-851X. JSTOR 2672442.
  27. ↑ Buckley, Chris (2017-04-18). "Criticism of Beijing's North Korea Policy Comes From Unlikely Place: China". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2026-04-13.
  28. ↑ "North Korea: The Problem That Won't Go Away". Brookings. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  29. ↑ www.cato.org https://www.cato.org/commentary/north-korea-worlds-worst-human-rights-black-hole. Retrieved 2026-04-12. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  30. ↑ "Human rights in North Korea". Amnesty International. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  31. ↑ "Document Viewer". docs.un.org. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  32. ↑ "DPRK (North Korea)". Security Council Report. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  33. ↑ "North Korea Tests "Unpredictable" Missile Flight Path in Latest Launch Toward Japan". UNITED24 Media. 2026-04-08. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  34. ↑ "The North Korean People's Challenges". libertyinnorthkorea.org. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  35. ↑ "North Korea's Horrors 'Strikingly Similar' to Nazi Acts". NBC News. 2014-02-17. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  36. ↑ York, Rob (2014-07-31). "Human rights in North Korea: The Nazi comparison | NK News". NK News - North Korea News. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  37. ↑ Walker, Peter (2014-02-18). "North Korea human rights abuses resemble those of the Nazis, says UN inquiry". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  38. ↑ David, Robert (2025-08-18). "Comparing terror: North Korea and Nazi Germany".
  39. ↑ Clisby, Ashley (2021-01-01). "North Korea: How Fear is Used to Control a Nation". Capstone Showcase.
  40. ↑ Park, Catherine E. Shoichet,Madison (2015-01-21). "North Korea slams defector over inaccuracies in story". CNN. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  41. ↑ Demick, Barbara (2009-12-29). Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea. Random House Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-385-52961-7. Search this book on
  42. ↑ "North Korea's Rights Crisis, Not Just Missiles, Needs Global Attention | Human Rights Watch". 2026-03-19. Retrieved 2026-04-13.
  43. ↑ Watch, Human Rights (2026-02-04). "World Report 2026; North Korea". https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2026/country-chapters/north-korea. Retrieved 2026-04-13. External link in |website= (help)
  44. ↑ "North Korea Tactic: Discredit Reports of Human-Rights Abuses | YaleGlobal Online". archive-yaleglobal.yale.edu. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  45. ↑ Korea, Committee for Human Rights in North. "The Human Rights Factor: Changes Under Kim Jong-un". Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  46. ↑ DuMond, Marie (2017-01-12). "View Inside North Korea: Information and Its Consequences in North Korea". Beyond Parallel. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  47. ↑ "Defectors lift curtain on North Korea's information blackout". PBS News. 2016-12-18. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  48. ↑ 48.0 48.1 Rosatelli, Meghan (2015-02-17). "Inventing North Korea | Daniel Fandino". Digital America. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  49. ↑ Green, John (2026-03-06). "Kim Jong Un: Memes Flood Internet as Netizens Tease North Korea's Leader's Eagerness to Fire Missile - Tuko.co.ke". www.tuko.co.ke. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  50. ↑ Zhang, Bingbing; Gearhart, Sherice; Perlmutter, David D. (2022). "Avoiding online censorship through 'fatty' memes: How Chinese social media users talk about North Korea". Global Media and Communication. 18 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1177/17427665221100596.
  51. ↑ Lee, Sang Yong (2023-05-25). "North Korea's War Against Outside Information and Culture - 38 North: Informed Analysis of North Korea". 38 North. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  52. ↑ Express, Dallas (2025-07-26). "North Korea's Insta-Fail: Cringe-Worthy Propaganda". Dallas Express. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  53. ↑ "The North Korean People's Challenges". libertyinnorthkorea.org. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  54. ↑ Korea, Committee for Human Rights in North. "North Korea's Lawfare Strategy". Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  55. ↑ "North Korea". United States Department of State. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  56. ↑ Korea, Committee for Human Rights in North. "North Korea's Lawfare Strategy". Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  57. ↑ "A New Low for North Korean Human Rights | The National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR)". Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  58. ↑ "North Korea's Window on the World Is at Risk of Closing | Human Rights Watch". 2025-07-21. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  59. ↑ "North Korea Human Rights Crisis: A Lost Decade of Repression and Fear". ImpACT International. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  60. ↑ Fahy, Sandra (2018), Yeo, Andrew; Chubb, Danielle, eds., "North Korea Responds to Transnational Human Rights Advocacy: State Discourse and Ersatz Civil Society", North Korean Human Rights: Activists and Networks, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 224–248, ISBN 978-1-108-42549-0, retrieved 2026-04-12
  61. ↑ Hawk, David (2014-10-16). "North Korea Responds to the UN Commission of Inquiry". 38 North. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  62. ↑ RFA, Taejun Kang for (2025-02-03). "North Korea responds to US 'hostility' in its first criticism of the Trump government". Radio Free Asia. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  63. ↑ bryanbetts (2023-05-31). "Kim Yo Jong denounces US over criticism of North Korea's failed satellite launch | NK News". NK News - North Korea News. Retrieved 2026-04-13.
  64. ↑ "North Korea criticizes Marco Rubio for calling it a 'rogue state'". NBC News. 2025-02-03. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  65. ↑ "North Korea blasts South's 'insulting' dramas and films". 2020-03-04. Retrieved 2026-04-12.
  66. ↑ ifangbremer (2024-10-30). "Kim Jong Un sensitive to criticism of regime's human rights abuses: Ex-diplomats | NK News". NK News - North Korea News. Retrieved 2026-04-12.



This article "Criticism of North Korea" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Criticism of North Korea. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.


Retrieved from "https://en.everybodywiki.com/index.php?title=Criticism_of_North_Korea&oldid=6098120"
License CC BY-SA 3.0
Powered by MediaWiki