Michigan v. Tyler
| Michigan v. Tyler | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued January 10, 1978 Decided May 31, 1978 | |
| Full case name | Michigan v. Loren Tyler and Robert Tompkins |
| Docket no. | 76-1608 |
| Citations | 436 U.S. 499 (more) |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Stewart, joined by Burger, Powell, White, Marshall, Stevens, Blackmun |
| Concurrence | Stevens |
| Concur/dissent | White, joined by Marshall |
| Dissent | Rehnquist |
| Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Michigan v. Tyler, 436 U.S. 499 (1978) is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the administrative warrant requirement set out in Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco applies to entries onto property for the purpose of investigating the cause of a fire, but that exceptions to the warrant requirement may nevertheless apply.[1] Specifically, the Court held that the plain view doctrine applies to any evidence observed and/or seized by firefighting or law enforcement officials during the emergency created by a fire.[2]
References[edit]
- ↑ "Michigan v. Tyler, 436 U.S. 499 (1978)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2021-10-23.
- ↑ "Michigan v. Tyler". Oyez. Retrieved October 26, 2021. Unknown parameter
|url-status=ignored (help)
This article "Michigan v. Tyler" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Michigan v. Tyler. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.
