You can edit almost every page by Creating an account. Otherwise, see the FAQ.

Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki


Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews  
DisciplinePhilosophy
LanguageEnglish
Edited byGary Gutting, Anastasia Friel Gutting
Publication details
Publication history
January 2002-present
Publisher
University of Notre Dame (United States)
Standard abbreviations
Notre Dame Phil. Rev.
Indexing
ISSN1538-1617
OCLC no.48927536
Links

Search Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews on Amazon.

Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews is an online-only peer-reviewed academic journal published by the University of Notre Dame that contains book reviews of books in topics related to philosophy. It was established in 2002. The editors-in-chief are Gary Gutting and Anastasia Friel Gutting.[1]

Editorial board[edit]

As of November 2013, the editorial board included a number of eminent philosophers such as Robert Audi, David Chalmers, Brian Leiter, and Paul Moser.[2]

Goals and format[edit]

The reviews are typically 1,500 to 2,500 words in length. The website states that its goal is to publish a book review of any major scholarly philosophical book within six to twelve months of the book's publication. Reviews are commissioned and vetted by the Editorial Board. Only newly released books and anthologies are reviewed, not reprints or new editions unless they contain substantial new material.[1]

Accessibility[edit]

The journal is published electronically (online) only. In addition to browsing the website for free, people can also subscribe for free via email or RSS. Any material appearing in the journal may be copied for educational use provided proper credit is given to the author and the journal.[1]

Reception[edit]

The journal appears in many lists of online resources and journals related to philosophy.[3][4][5][6][7]

In 2007, philosopher Brian Leiter (who was and still is on the editorial board) wrote on his blog, Leiter Reports: "I want to start by saying that Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews is a wonderful resource, for which the whole profession is indebted to Gary Gutting who runs it so well." He then went on to criticize one of the reviews that appeared on the site.[8] In 2012, the blog Philosophers Anonymous criticized the journal for publishing low-quality reviews.[9]

Philosophy bloggers often link to and discuss reviews published in the journal in their blog posts.[10][11][12][13]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 "About". Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Retrieved November 28, 2013.
  2. "Editorial Board". Retrieved November 28, 2013.
  3. "E-Resources - Philosophy". D. Hiden Ramsey Library at UNC Asheville. Retrieved November 28, 2013.
  4. "Web Resources". University College London. Retrieved November 28, 2013.
  5. Dilworth, John. "Full text online philosophical journals". Western Michigan University. Retrieved November 28, 2013.
  6. Varzi, Achille. "Philosophy Links and Resources". Columbia University. Retrieved November 28, 2013.
  7. "Philosophy journals and magazines". Arts Online. Retrieved November 28, 2013.
  8. Leiter, Brian (May 7, 2007). "How Can Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews Publish Nonsense Like This?". Retrieved November 28, 2013.
  9. "Dear Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews". Philosophers Anonymous. June 20, 2012. Retrieved November 28, 2013.
  10. Gray, Jonathan (June 22, 2013). "Review of Hamann and the Tradition in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews". Retrieved November 29, 2013.
  11. Gratton, Peter (November 6, 2013). "On the Introduction of Maoism into Philosophy". Retrieved November 29, 2013.
  12. "Laden Reviewed in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews". September 12, 2012. Retrieved November 29, 2013.
  13. Smith, Justin E. H. (April 17, 2012). "Review of Divine Machines in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews". Retrieved November 29, 2013.

External links[edit]



This article "Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.