Per fas et nefas
"Per fas et nefas" (Latin for "through right and wrong") refers to unfair eristic treatment. It occurs when interlocutor A postulates a theory, and cites several reasons that justify it. Interlocutor B then refutes one of the arguments, and triumphantly declares that A's argument has no basis, even though they never said a word about the other arguments that A put forth.
See also[edit]
Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "".Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "".
This logic-related article is a stub. You can help EverybodyWiki by expanding it. |
This article "Per fas et nefas" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Per fas et nefas. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.