The Marmot Review
 | This article appears to have been generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT) without having been rigorously scrutinized for verifiability, neutrality, original research, and copyright compliance. It may include misleading or inaccurate claims and fake references that sound plausible. (April 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
The Marmot Review is a sequence of independent, government‑commissioned examinations of health inequities in England led by the epidemiologist Sir Michael Marmot. It situates the nation's persistent mortality gradient within the broader social, economic, and environmental conditions in which people “are born, grow, live, work and age”, and it offers policy prescriptions to narrow that gradient through what Marmot termed “proportionate universalism”—universal action, but applied at a scale and intensity commensurate with need.[1]
Background
Marmot's earlier Whitehall Studies on social class and cardiovascular mortality persuaded the Department of Health to appoint him, in 2008, to chair a Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England post‑2010. His team—drawing on nine expert task groups, stakeholder hearings, and rapid evidence syntheses—was asked to delineate “the most effective evidence‑based strategies” for reducing health inequity over the ensuing decade.[1]
Fair Society, Healthy Lives (2010)
Commission and methodology
Published in February 2010, the first review analysed contemporary epidemiology, economics, and social‑policy evidence; it incorporated cost‑benefit modelling that estimated annual productivity losses from health inequities at £31–33 billion.[citation needed]
Conceptual framework
The report introduced proportionate universalism and located health along a social gradient: with each rung down the socioeconomic ladder, morbidity rises and life expectancy falls. Consequently, purely targeted approaches were deemed insufficient.[citation needed]
Policy objectives
- Give every child the best start in life;
- Enable all children, young people, and adults to maximise capabilities and control;
- Create fair employment and good work for all;
- Ensure a healthy standard of living for all;
- Create and develop healthy and sustainable places and communities;
- Strengthen the role and impact of ill‑health prevention.
Response
Within two years, over three‑quarters of English local authorities reported aligning their joint strategic needs assessments to the review's framework; Public Health England embedded the “Marmot Indicators” in its annual profiles.[citation needed]
Marmot Places
The Marmot architecture informed “Marmot City” pilots—beginning with Coventry in 2013—and later Marmot Places in Gwent, Luton, and Cheshire & Merseyside. However, parallel austerity‑era reductions in local‑government, welfare, and early‑years budgets disproportionately hit deprived communities, limiting the reach of preventive services and Sure Start centres.[2]
Health Equity in England: The Marmot Review 10 Years On (2020)
The following outline the key findings from The Marmot Review 10 Years On:[3]
Key findings
- For the first time in more than a century, life expectancy stalled nationally and fell for women in the poorest decile.
- The North–South divide widened; the gradient steepened.
- Years lived in ill health increased across all groups.
The review linked these trends to regressive public‑spending patterns after 2010, arguing that budgetary cuts “harmed health and contributed to widening inequalities”.
Recommendations
It called for:
- Investment in early‑years services;
- A cross‑government health‑equity strategy;
- A minimum income for healthy living;
- Strengthened local public‑health infrastructure.
Build Back Fairer: the COVID‑19 Marmot Review (December 2020)
Commissioned by the Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership and the Health Foundation, this report demonstrated how pre‑existing inequities amplified COVID-19 mortality—particularly among Black, Asian and minority‑ethnic communities and insecure workers—and argued that pandemic recovery must “embed equity at the heart of economic strategy”.[citation needed]
Legacy
By 2024 the Marmot framework had been cited in parliamentary debates on “levelling up”, in NHS England's Core20PLUS5 strategy, and in forthcoming WHO Europe guidance on social determinants. Marmot's team estimates that one million premature deaths over the last decade were attributable to remediable inequalities—an assertion fuelling calls for a statutory Health Equity Act.[4]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 "Report 2/2020 Marmot Review 10 Years On".
- ↑ Boseley, Sarah (2020-02-25). "Austerity blamed for life expectancy stalling for first time in century". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2025-04-20.
- ↑ "Health Equity in England: The Marmot Review 10 Years On | The Health Foundation". www.health.org.uk. 2020-02-25. Retrieved 2025-04-20.
- ↑ Thomas, Tobi; Health, Tobi Thomas; correspondent, inequalities (2024-01-08). "Health inequalities 'caused 1m early deaths in England in last decade'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2025-04-20.
This article "The Marmot Review" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:The Marmot Review. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.
