Hodi

Hodi
হদি/হুদি/অদি/হোদি/হাদি
Total population
	~[14000-16000]
Regions with significant populations
	Bangladesh (Greater Mymensingh), India (Assam)
Languages
	Bodo-kachari/ Mandai-Thar
Religion
	Animism, Naturalism, Hinduism
Related ethnic groups
	Mandai, Bodo, Koch, Garo, other Tibeto-Burman groups

Hodi (হদি)

The Hodi (হদি) are an indigenous ethnic group primarily residing in the Old Brahmaputra Valley in Bangladesh and Assam, India. They are also known as Hodi-Mandai (হদি-মান্দাই) in some ethnographic records. The Hodi are considered one of the earliest inhabitants of the region, with a heritage spanning over a thousand years.

History

The Hodi possess a history of over a thousand years and are believed to be a branch of the Assamese Bodo. The Hodi once occupied the Brahmaputra flood plains and rich flat plains and subsisted on agriculture, fishing, and bamboo-based artisanal enterprises. The area was settled by a tribe known as the Mandai (a group with Indo-Mongoloid origin and Dravidian admix) before the settling of Garos in the Mymensingh district. Over time, they intermarried and intermingled and two distinct branches of culture developed: one group, who migrated to the Madhupur forest, were known as Kochh-Mandai and the other, after absorption amongst the Garo (or Mandi), as Hodi-Mandai. Hudi Nikni (clan of Koch) and Do’al Mahari (clan of Garo) have created this Mandai branch by intermarriage.

Although the Hodi have long been outside the pale of formal Hindu caste society, they firmly consider themselves Kshatriya (warrior class), and have even organized themselves into five Gotras (clans), following the mythical sons of a Kshatriya Raja. These endogenous frameworks continue to determine their conduct in ritual, marriage customs, and social organization.

In the first half of the 20th century, the Hodi demanded official confirmation of their Kshatriya identity and agitated in 1921 Jamalpur Census, but were not recognized by colonial powers. This conflict over identity and legitimacy is an extension of the overall marginalization they have experienced—socially, economically, and politically.

Historical accounts also suggest that the Hodi played a role in the Pagalpanthi movement at Sherpur following Tipu Shah's death, indicating their involvement in larger movements of resistance and socio-political consciousness in Bengal's colonial past.

Language

The Hodi people speak the Hodi-Mandai language, a Tibeto-Burman language closely related to Bodo and Koch languages. Linguists classify Hodi-Mandai within the Bodo group due to structural and lexical similarities, though it has distinct phonological and syntactic features.

Culture

The Hodi maintain rich oral traditions, including folklore, songs, and rituals related to nature and ancestor worship. Traditional activities include fishing, hunting, and small-scale agriculture. Some of their practices, such as stick fighting (lathi khela) and bird-watching customs, are unique to their culture.

Socio-Spatial Structure

The social structure of the Hodi community is characterized by a distinctive and segmented social organization grounded in kinship, culture and spatiality. This organization serves to reinforce communal identity, the regulation of social norms and the organization of everyday and ritual life.

└── Geram (Village)

  └── Para (Neighborhood)
        └── Samaj (Community Group)
              └── Ghar (Homestead)
                    └── Sharik (Family Unit)

a. Sharik (Family Unit): A Sharik consists of 4 to 6 members of a nuclear or extended family who reside together. It is the smallest residential and everyday life unit.

b. Ghar (Homestead): A Ghar is made up of 1 to 5 Sharik units. These households live together in a shared homestead or compound, often around a central inner courtyard. Certain common daily activities such as cooking, handicraft, and small-scale cultivation are often performed at this level on a shared basis.

c. Samaj (Community Group): A Samaj is formed by 15 to 20 Ghar units. It is a socially bonded or kin-based group with the role of the organization of ritual, festival, and conflict resolution. A Samaj is also a common identity and collective responsibility unit.

Previously, a Samaj was formed by the members of one Dugu (clan), and nowadays it is often comprised of the members of one Gotra (lineage group). Each Samaj is internally divided into a number of Dugu, clans of common origin. People of the same Dugu observe rules of strict exogamy, i.e., they do not intermarry within the same clan. The Dugu organization perpetuates lineage identity across Paras and even between distant settlements.

The Hodi are of five Gotra, each of which is supposed to have descended from one of the five sons of a legendary Kshatriya king, according to Hindu mythology (e.g., the Mahabharata). These Gotras define deeper genealogical identity and prescribe marriage rules, shaping how Dugus are organized in the society.

d. Para (Neighborhood): A Para is made up of 5 to 7 units of Samaj. It is a unit at the neighborhood level of the entire village. A Para typically has common infrastructure such as water bodies, religious spaces (temples or Thaan), congregation spaces, and seasonal festival spaces.

e. Geram (Village): The Geram represents the entire village—a culturally integrated settlement made up of a number of Paras. It reflects the common identity, collective knowledge, and socio-spatial harmony of the Hodi. Despite being under migration and cultural erosion, the Geram is a site of rooted belonging and strength against a changing socio-political order।

In contemporary times, due to reduced population, scattered migration, and shrinking land availability, settlements are smaller in scale. As a result, a Para is now often referred to as a Geram, serving as both the neighborhood and the overall village unit. This shift reflects the adaptive nature of the Hodi’s socio-spatial identity in the face of cultural and territorial erosion.

Nature of the Hodi Community

The nature of the Hodi community is gentle, communal, and uncomplicated, shaped by centuries of existence on the Bengal-Assam borderland's floodplains and forests. Their character conveys a robust sense of land, kin, and tradition in spite of marginalization and loss of culture.

a. Emotionally Receptive and Non-Confrontational The Hodi are soft-hearted and peace-loving. They are not moved by violence or coercion but by brotherhood, respect, and emotional appeal. This is aptly illustrated by a popular local saying: Muchi chole gaailee Hodi chole bhaailee ‘The Cobbler moves when scolded hard, The Hodi melts with a brotherly card!’ Their cooperation and agreement are likely to develop through mutual empathy rather than pressure or command.

b. Communal and Cooperative Hodi's social life is based on mutual support, common practice, and seasonal labor, wherein day-to-day life is focused. With regard to marriage, agriculture, and festivals, their social life is enwoven in common responsibility and family cooperation. Their Para and Samaj system enables close support groups, which previously have replaced state rule.

c. Spiritually Rooted and Ritualistic They possess a deep spiritual connection with nature and ancestral customs. Their deification of goddesses like Manasa, their reverence of tools like the Dhenki, and rituals tied to land, harvest, and marriage speak of a worldview wherein religiosity is omnipresent in everyday life. They also adhere to astrological rules like Khonar Bachan for land selection and homestead planning.

d. Environmentally Sensitive and Adaptive The Hodi showcase a natural ecological intelligence, which has been shaped by their proximity to rivers, wetlands, and forests. Their use of bamboo, medicinal plants, and seasonal migrations illustrates a way of life with the earth. Their traditional habitation comprises inner courtyards (Uthan), outer courtyards (Dohol), and animal enclosures (Bondo)—illustrating concern for microclimate, sanitation, and circulation of resources.

e. Culturally Vulnerable, Yet Resilient While non-aggressive, the Hodi are resilient in silence. In the face of displacement, poverty, and cultural subjugation, they deal with life by clinging to what they can—rituals, clan affiliations (Dugu), Gotra-based social norms, and traditional handicraft. Their vulnerability lies in their humility, political voicelessness, and exclusion from formal identity systems.

Religion

The Hodi’s spiritual life is a complex blend of naturalism and Hindu traditions. Their original belief system centered around natural elements, which they continue to worship today despite their adoption of Shakto, Shaiva, Vaishnav, and Brahma practices. However, their approach to these religions is not orthodox, reflecting a unique fusion of Indigenous and Hindu beliefs. In addition to gods and goddesses, they hold deep reverence for nature and their ancestors. They believe that the souls of their ancestors return as crows, bringing blessings to their descendants.

Socioeconomic Status

The Hodi are economically marginalized, with limited access to education and formal employment. Efforts by NGOs and local governments are ongoing to improve the living conditions of the Hodi community.

Land and Migration

Perhaps the most pressing issue facing the Hodi today is land displacement. Over the years, economic pressures have led many families to sell their land, often to wealthier, non-Indigenous landowners. As a result, many Hodis now live on leased Khas land, with no formal rights to the land they occupy. This precarious living situation has left them vulnerable to further displacement and has disrupted the continuity of their community life. The Hodi are scattered across five districts—Mymensingh, Netrokona, Tangail, Kishoreganj and Sherpur—often living on the periphery of society. Their displacement has resulted in a gradual erosion of their cultural practices, as younger generations grow up disconnected from the ancestral lands and traditions that once defined Hodi life. They have developed a concept of adjustment, where they do not exclude the landless. Instead, they include them and offer shelter on their own land or in their homes, despite having limited land themselves. They believe that nothing belongs to an individual—Everything is Communal.

Contemporary Issues

Rapid urbanization, river erosion, and environmental changes threaten the traditional lifestyle of the Hodi. Cultural documentation projects aim to preserve their language, rituals, and heritage for future generations.

References

Ahmed and Kabir (2005), A Study of traditional Housing of “Pahari” Communities in

           the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT).

Ali N. (2017), Maxims of Daak and Khona [in Bengali], Dhaka, Bangladesh: Afsar

           Brothers.

Anderson (1983), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of

          Nationalism.

Appadurai (1996), Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Minneapolis,

           University of Minnesota Press.

Asad (2021), History of the Ethnic Minorities in Bangladesh [in Bengali], pp. 71 & 218,

           Dhaka, Bangladesh: Dhaka Prokashoni.

Atawula (2019), Innovational Refugee Shelter Design with Pneumatic Sandwich Structure.

Bamboo, Bangladesh National Building Code 2012, Structural Design, Part 6, Chapter 4.

Bamboo Structures- Bamboo Culms- Structural Design, ISO-22156, 2nd Ed., 2021-06

Bangladesh Delta Plan (2018), Baseline Studies on Water Resources Management, Vol. 1,

           Ministry of Planning, GOB.

Bangladesh Environment Conservation Act , Act no-1, Bangladesh Gazette (1995)
Bangladesh Folk Culture Series–Mymensingh [in Bengali], Bangla Academy, 2017.

Bangladesh Folk Culture Series–Sherpur [in Bengali], Dhaka, Bangladesh : Bangla

Bangladesh Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (BIPRA).

Bangladesh One Health Strategic Framework 2025-2030, Ministry of Health and Family

           Welfare (MOHFW), GOB.

Bangladesh Zila Gazetteer Mymensingh (2024), pp. 65-66 , Published by Statistics and

           Informatics Division (SID), Ministry of Planning, GOB.

Bengal District Gazetteers - Mymensingh (1917).

Biswas, Kabir and Khan (2019), Causes of Urban Migration in Bangladesh: Evidence from

           the Urban Health Survey.

Booth and Hiss (2012), Residential Landscape Architecture: Design Process for the Private

           Residence, 6th Ed.

Brar-Josan (2011), Developing A Sense of Belonging During Resettlement Amongst Former

           Refugee Young Adults.

Census & Household Survey 2022: Primary Report, Table 1.4, pp. 33 & 34, Ministry of

           Planning, GOB.

Census of India (1901), Vol. 1, Part 1, pp. 505 & 521.

Census of India (1911), Vol. 1, Part 1.

Census of India (1921), Vol. 1, Part 2.

Census of India (1931), Vol. 1, Part 1, p. 475.

Census of India (1941), Vol. 1, Part 1, p. 110.

Coburn,Vartanian and Chatterjee (2017), Buildings, Beauty, and the Brain: A

           Neuroscience of Architectural Experience, Journal of * Cognitive Neuroscience 
           29:9, pp. 1521–1531, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Community Profile Based on the Indigenous Navigator Framework [in Bengali], pp.

           9-11, Kapaeeng Foundation, May 2024.

Das, Shankar Dev and Bhakti Movement of Assam [in Bengali], Shankar Dev Society

           (Publication year not mentioned).

Dalton, Tuite (1872), Descriptive Ethnology of Bengal.

Dowsett (1987), The Vernacular Architecture of Two Ethnic Groups in Manitoba, A

           Comparative Study, Society for the study of architecture in Canada, vol. 12,
           no. 3, pp. 7-13.

Earth Touch (June 2014), Issue No.15, Editor- Philip Gain, SEHD.

Eberherd (2009), Applying Neuroscience to Architecture.

Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader (2007), Edited by Antonius C. G.

           M. Robben and Jeffrey A. Sluka.

Faruque (2018), Geometric Study of Homesteads in Bangladesh Focusing on Maxims of

           “Khona”

Feasibility of Water Supply and Sanitation Options in Rural Areas under Feasibility and

           Review Study on Rural Water and Sanitation (2022), Study-03, "My Village My
           Town" Technical Assistance Project , LGED, GOB.

Friedman (1994), Cultural Identity and Global Process, Chapter 5.
Gain (2015), Excluded Groups and Democratization, SEHD.
Gain (2016), On the Margins: Images of Tea Workers and Ethnic Communities.
Gupta (1971),Struggle that has no End [in Bengali], Kolkata, India:Kalantor Publication.
Handbook on Design and Construction of Housing for Flood-Prone Rural Areas of

           Bangladesh (2005), Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC), GOB, UNDP, 
           BRACU.

Hasan (1985), A Study of Traditional House Forms in Rural Bangladesh.

Haque (2002), History and Lifestyle of Tribes [in Bengali], p. 197, Dhaka, Bangladesh:

           Kowshik Prokashoni.

Hillier (2007), Space is the Machine.

Hunter, W. W. (1875), A Statistical Account of Bengal: Districts of Dacca, Bákarganj, Farídpur

            and Maimansinh (Vol. 5), London: Trübner & Co.
            Available at Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin – Preußischer Kulturbesitz. Public Domain.

https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/ST4O2OAIZPXP2HZHAZLTOGANA5J5KGWJ

Indigenous Communities, Cultural Survey Series of Bangladesh, Vol. 5, Asiatic Society

           of Bangladesh, 2007.

Isah (2016), Urban Public Housing in Northern Nigeria The Search for Indigeneity and

           Cultural Practices in Design.

Islam and Shafie (2006), Anthropology on the Move: Contextualizing Culture

           Studies in Bangladesh. Department of Anthropology, University of Dhaka.

Kashidasi Mahabharata [in Bengali], Kolkata, India: Akshoy Library, 1988.
Khan A. (2020), Society and Culture of Dalu, Hodi and Banai Communities [in Bengali],

           pp. 43–65, Dhaka, Bangladesh: Apon Prokash.

Kottak (2011), Cultural Anthropology: Appreciating Cultural Diversity, Chapter 2 & 6.

Mackercher and Cros (2012), Cultural Tourism The Partnership Between Tourism and Cultural Heritage Management, Chapter 6.

Master Plan of Small Scale Water Resources Development in Sherpur District (2005),

           Study Report by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), MLGRD&C, 
           LGED, GOB.

Maulden (1986), Tectonics in Architecture: From the Physical to the Meta-Physical
MASS Design Group (2015), Lo-Fab, Retrieved from:

            https://massdesigngroup.org/work/advocacy/lo-fab

Mazumdar (1904), An Account of Mymensingh [in Bengali], Annex C and

           Mazumdar (1905), History of Mymensingh [in Bengali], Chapter 11.
             *The compilation of these two books was published by Anupkumar Mahindar, Pustok Biponi, 27 
             Beniatola Lane, Kolkata -700009 in January 2000.

Meghalaya WaterBodies (Conservation and Protection) Guidelines (2023), Government

           of Meghalaya Forest and Environment Department, Annexure-B, Part 1.

Migratory Birds in Bangladesh and East Asian-Australasian Flyway Network Sites

           (2020), Bangladesh Forest Department.

Mrema, Gumbe, Chepete and Agullo (2011), Rural Structures in the Tropics Design and

           Development.

Mukul (2007), Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development in Bangladesh:

           An overview of the present status, management problems and future prospects.

Murmu M. (2009), Search for Indigenous People [in Bengali], Dhaka, Bangladesh:

           Nawroze Kitabistan.

National Industrial Policy (2016), MOI, GOB.

Nguyen, Ratnasiri, Heitmann, Tazin, Anderson, Hanif, Yeamin, Shoab, Shanta, Jahan,

           Hossain, Mahmud, Jubair, Rahman, Rahman, Ercumen, Chung (2025),
           Potential pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes in household
           environments: a study of soil floors and cow dung in rural Bangladesh,
           ASM Journals, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 91, No. 6.

Nodi-Bangla (October 2022), Issue No. 03, Vol. 04, Quarterly Journal of BIWTA.

One Health Theory of Change, One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP), WHO

Oliver (2006), Built to need meets : Cultural Issues in Vernacular architecture, Oxford:

           Elsevier.

Rahmatullah, Haque, Mondol, Mandal, Azad, Seraj & Jahan (2011), Medicinal Plants of

           the Hodis: A Disappearing Tribe of Bangladesh,  The Journal of Alternative and 
           Complementary Medicine Volume 17, Number 12, 2011, pp. 1103–1108.

Rapoport (1969), House Form and Culture, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Risley (1892), The Tribes and Castes of Bengal, Vol. 1, pp. 491-500.

Ron Eglash (1999), African Fractals: Modern Computing and Indigenous Design, New

           Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Roy (2009), The ILO Convention on Indigenous and Tribal Populations, 1957 (No.107)

           and the Laws of Bangladesh: A Comparative Review, PRO 169, International 
           Labour Standards Department, ILO Geneva and ILO Office in Dhaka.

Ruggles (2018), Beauty, Neuroscience, and Architecture: Timeless Patterns and Their

           Impact on Our Well-Being.

Sherpur Ethnic Survey (2024), BBS, Ministry of Planning, GOB

SIL International Bangladesh Monthly Report (July 2022), Vol. 14, Issue 7.

SIL International Bangladesh Report (2021), My Language My Identity, Vol. 2.
Small Ethnic Groups’ Cultural Institution Act (SEGCIA), 2010
Swarnakanto (2002), History of Hodis [in Bengali], Commemorative tribute of Silver

           Jubilee, Tribal Welfare Association.

Structural Design Using Bamboo — Code of Practice, IS 15912 : 2018

Survival on the Fringe Adivasis of Bangladesh, Society for Environment and Human

           Development (SEHD), Lalmatia Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh, 2011.

Tabassum (2019), Identification of Archetypical Vernacular Architectural Form of

           Bengal.

The East Bengal State Acquisition & Tenancy Act (1950), Part 1, Chapter 13,Section-97.

The IPF Component of the Bangladesh Transforming Secondary Education for Results

           Program (2017), Tribal Peoples Planning Framework (TPPF), GOB.

Timm (1991), The Adivasis of Bangladesh, Minority Rights Group International Report,

           92/1.

Updated Tribal Gazette, Bangladesh Gazette (2019), Section 2 & 19.

</references>

External links

This article "Hodi" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Hodi. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.