Keshavan Madhava Menon v. The State of Bombay
From EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki
Script error: No such module "AfC submission catcheck".
 | This article's lead section does not adequately summarize key points of its contents. (January 2021) |
| Keshavan Madhava Menon v. State of Bombay | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
| Full case name | Keshavan Madhava Menon v. State of Bombay |
| Citation(s) | AIR 1951 SC 128; 1951 SCR 228 |
Keshavan Madhava Menon v. State of Bombay, AIR 1951 SC 128, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in which the Court held that a law which already existed when the Constitution of India came into force was void only to the extend that it was inconsistent with the provisions of Part-III.[1][2][3]
References[edit]
- ↑ "KESHAVAN MADHAVAN MENON V STATE OF BOMBAY | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine". www.casemine.com. Retrieved 2021-01-25.
- ↑ Boopal, Pragash (2019-04-15). "Keshavan Madhavan Menon vs. State of Bombay". Law Times Journal. Retrieved 2021-02-21.
- ↑ "Doctrine of Eclipse: Explanation with related case laws". The Fact Factor. 2019-05-14. Retrieved 2021-02-21.
 | This article about the law of India is a stub. You can help EverybodyWiki by expanding it. |
This article "Keshavan Madhava Menon v. The State of Bombay" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Keshavan Madhava Menon v. The State of Bombay. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.
