Ashuddhi

• • IMDb is a user-generated site. Anybody can submit a project to IMDb, so a project being listed there doesn't mean that it is notable, or even legitimate. Take a look at this totally fake "movie" created by a kid, who also tried to use the IMDb presence to legitimise the hoax article he created at Wikipedia. Koimoi is not a reliable source per WP:ICTFSOURCES and as IWMBuzz is a PR site, it is inherently dependent on press releases, which means that it is not an independent source, as is required to establish notability per our General Notability Guideline (GNG). While The Tribune in general is reliable, the article you included has no byline, which means it could be a press release (i.e. not independent), it doesn't speak in depth about the film (i.e. doesn't meet the "significant coverage" requirement of WP:GNG) and the entire second paragraph is an actor quote (i.e. not independent.) So, in plain terms, none of the references provided help to establish the film's notability. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:18, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
    • The article doesn't speak about the depth of the film, but the headline of the article says it all. Also, i assume, you missed out the article's last line where it claims the series release date.RadheSlate (talk) 11:33, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
    • I have included another article from another reliable outlet Deccan Chronicle which speaks about The Depth of the Film (i.e. meets the "significant coverage" requirement of WP:GNG. Now this article has two reliable sources that cannot be ignored or denied. RadheSlate (talk) 11:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
      • @RadheSlate: You seem to be (conveniently) confused about what I actually said and are ignoring other key details. I didn't say that the Tribune doesn't talk about the "depth of the series" I said that The Tribune does not speak in depth about the series. It tells us (vaguely) where it streams, it lists two stars, includes a brief plot synopsis and then tells us when the series will be released. Four pieces of data is not in depth coverage. Where was it shot? How long did filming take? Were there any problems along the way? Who directed it? Who did the music? How much did it cost to produce? This sort of content inches us closer to "in depth", but if such content is presented in the context of a press relesae or interview, which fail the independent aspect of the General Notability Guideline's requirement. And as I said above, the bulk of the 'article' is a quote from Tejwani, thus, not independent. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC) I erroneously called this a "film", when I meant series. I have changed those terms in my most recent response. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:42, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
      • If i go by your in depth explanation what you just wrote, the Article would be termed as PR Note where the Article will speak about the series Length, Budget, Cast and Crew details etc. I hope we are not looking for a PR Note but a proper Article from reliable sources. This article has two articles from reliable sources, IMDb Link (To explain the Cast and Crew details), and some bulk articles which you may want to recognize or not. I think this article justifies it's stay on Wikipedia. If not, i really have no idea what exactly are you looking out for. (talk) 12:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
        • We're looking for detailed coverage about the series that isn't a press release, that isn't an interview, and that comes from reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. If you can't find that, then perhaps it's too early to publish this article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
          • There are other detailed coverage to support the article which are neither Press Release, nor Interview, along with two reliable sources. There are also many articles on Wikipedia which are published on the basis of one or two reliable source articles. (talk) 04:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
            • I have now submitted a properly detailed explained review of the mini-series from a very reliable outlet Mid-Day. Earlier this link was broken due to some technical error, may be. Now the Article has 03 Reliable coverage and some supportive coverage. I hereby request this Article for Publishing. (talk) 03:54, 01 February 2021 (UTC)
              • The Mid-Day reference is useless, as it appears to be a reprint of "partnered content" (hmm, like a press release?) from an unknown source. Mid-day doesn't even stand behind it, disclaiming: "This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text." So this is clearly not content generated by the reliable source, and thus it does nothing to advance the claim that the subject is notable. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
                • No one gives anyone the right to call any reference as a useless reference. Myself, being a journalist, would love to take the opportunity to explain you what 'Partnered Content' exactly means here in Indian Journalism, especially in Entertainment Media. When a particular article or a story is written/created by two or more Authors for different sources, and those two or more Authors feels not to be named in the 'Byline', it is known as 'Partnered Content'. As far as Mid-Day not accepting any responsibilities or liabilities goes, the reliable source means, if the content, in any case, hurts any religious feelings or sentiments, the reliable source cannot be called out for any responsibilities. They give this line for any 'Partnered Content'. This does not at all means, the content is not released from the reliable source or the reliable source is ashamed to release the content. I really have no idea why you are 'Purposely' targeting my Edits or my Contributions. I am noticing this from a long time. First you targeted my Edits on Kavita Radheshyam, later Faisal Saif and now here. I am not here to do any Promotions to anyone. I am here for contributions. There are so many Articles on Wikipedia that are there on merely one or two reliable source references. This Article has a total number of 08 References (Supportive and Sub-Supportive, both). RadheSlate (talk) 03:43, 04 February 2021 (UTC)
                  • 1) Your definition of "partnered content" seems to differ from Mid-Day's, since they very clearly indicate at the bottom of the article that the content came from an outside entity, not from two of its journalists, as you seem to be intimating. Mid-Day did not produce that content. 2) Wikipedians can absolutely decide what sources are suitable for meeting the community's standards. For instance, the community considers Forbes Magazine to be a reliable source. The community does not consider Forbes.com contributor articles to be reliable. Like Mid-Day, Forbes.com also distances itself from contributor content with a similar disclaimer. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

• I have re-submitted the broken link to a fresh link for Mid-Day (talk) 03:51, 01 February 2021 (UTC)

---

Ashuddhi
Genre	Mystery
Created by	Faisal Saif
Developed by	Faisal Saif
Written by	Faisal Saif
Directed by	Faisal Saif
Starring	Hiten Tejwani Kavita Radheshyam
Country of origin	India
Original language(s)	Hindi
No. of seasons	1
No. of episodes	4
Production
Producer(s)	Nivedita Basu Kavita Radheshyam
Production location(s)	Mumbai, Maharashtra India
Cinematography	Chintan Vaidya
Running time	25-30 minutes
Production company(s)	Faith Pictures Inc
Distributor	Ullu App
Release
Original network	Ullu App
Picture format	HDTV 1080i
Audio format	Dolby Digital
Original release	30 October 2020 (2020-10-30)

Search Ashuddhi on Amazon.

Ashuddhi is a Hindi Mystery Thriller mini web series created and directed by Faisal Saif for the video on demand platform Ullu App. It stars one of the most popular TV face Hiten Tejwani and Kavita Radheshyam as Protagonists. The web series is about secret society such as Illuminati.

The series opened to highly positive reviews where Critics raved the performance of Kavita Radheshyam after her cult series Kavita Bhabhi and stated the series to be a perfect fusion of Erotica, Thriller and Horror.

The web series is jointly produced and presented by Nivedita Basu and Kavita Radheshyam.

Cast

• Hiten Tejwani as Karan Oberoi
• Kavita Radheshyam as Vidya Ghosh
• Chandana Gowda as Mareeta Barbosa
• Shiny Dixit as Shweta Mathur
• Rohit Rajawat
• Bidisha Ghosh Sharma

Release and Reception

The mini series streamed to highly positive reviews and appreciations where Mid Day gave 4 stars and called it "This Ashuddhi web series is probably one of the most intense web series made to date which will leave you speechless!" Bollywood Bubble awarded 4 Stars and called it "Thriller that highlights existence of Illuminati and will keep you on the hooks". The Screen Weekly also gave 4 Stars and called it 'A Pure Knock Out' by comparing actress Kavita Radheshyam with Sharon Stone for the seduction factor. IWMBuzz awarded 3.5 stars and wrote "Sex Amid Evil, Perfect Combo For An Erotic Entertainment". Deccan Chronicle praised the series by calling it the face of Ullu App's new content and further stated it as a pathfinder of the trend

External links

• Ashuddhi on IMDb Search this movie on

This article "Ashuddhi" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical and/or the page Edithistory:Ashuddhi. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.

📰 Article(s) of the same category(ies)

• Dahshat ke 6 Saal
• The Cellar (upcoming film)
• Poppy Playtime Indie Horror game
• 10 Dead Doves
• J.C. Bratton
• The gravediggers scandal of the town of Frankenstein
• Dark Deception

---