Commoditys In Disputed Seas in Court
Commodity's In Disputed Seas in Court
China unilaterally launched an air defense identification zone late last year.[1] Plaintiff, BRENDA JUSTICE, 14-CV-1843[2] China hits back at Japan for criticism over fishing curbs]</ref> Claimed the actions of what appears to be Chinese authorities alleged have caused the "reckless endangerment of her life ... and all human life." Plaintiff alleges that these actions have been taken "so as to take titles to lands[,] waters[,] and airs for the purpose of profiteering and piracy."[3] Chinese interfered with Vietnam vessels could be viewed as an act of “state piracy.” This could well entail international or U.S court of Law legal action against the Chinese ships and banks involved. Plaintiff further describes these actions as "racketeering."
Plaintiff states that the basis of jurisdiction for her action is that: this Court has constitutional jurisdiction over treaties so as that force by the United States can not be started even for the right of navigation where Chinese patrol vessels ... block and board foreign ships passing through Chinese-claimed waters and the United States can't use force for the occupation of South China Sea islands without a warrant of this Court. The United States[] may not start the use of force without a warrant of this Court. Bank of A China, has laundered money and used "bank money to finance and exploit fishing, oil and any other commodity in the disputed seas that have not been agreed to by the United Nations." Plaintiff alleges that the actions of Defendant T and the actions of what appears to be Chinese authorities alleged above have caused the "reckless endangerment of her life ... and all human life." Plaintiff alleges that these actions have been taken "so as to take titles to lands, waters[,] and airs for the purpose of profiteering and piracy." Plaintiff further describes these actions as "racketeering."
Plaintiff seeks relief from this Court that would "stop Defendant Bank of A China, from using bank money to finance and exploit fishing, oil or any other commodity in the disputed seas and islands that are not agreed to by the United Nations. " Plaintiff also seeks relief from this
Court that would compel Defendant Bank of A China to "show patriotic support for the United States so that it may run a United States bank." Plaintiff also requests as relief that, "by taking part in this Court, the Republic of China agrees not to shoot at... United States forces on or in any land[,] sea[,] or air and for any dispute of potential shooting war ... to come before this Court to be resolved."
References[edit]
+
This article "Commoditys In Disputed Seas in Court" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.
